[ 3166 J v. + ine Sut

Petition under Article 226 ol the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent No,s. 3 and 4 in calling the petitioner and her maternal uncle's sons to the police station, making them to sit in the police station for whole day and threatening that, they shall not do any agricultural activities in their agricultural lands i.e., the landadmeasuringAc.l5.00gtsinSyNo's516,517'518,519and520(new numbers), the tlr: r rmber of the said sy. No',s. is 3Bl (ord nurrber), the land admeasuring Ar. 4 ('0 gts in Sy. No 133/1 , and Ac 7.0l qt:; in Sy No 380/1 ' situated at Mollanpra I e Village, Navipet tvlandal' Nizamabad Dis rict' is nothing but abusing the po'^ers vested in them' depriving the personlrl liberties and violative of pro/is;iors of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the corstitutir)n of lndia and alsoviolativeo'prrirr:plesofnaturaljusticeConsequentryCiecttherespondent No's. 3 and 4 rot tr. call the petitioners to the police station not tt make them sit in the police s:a1.ior, thereby not to prevent them in arry rrann :r in doing the agricultural aciiv ti':s in the agricultural lands stated ab<:ve belong to the petitloner No. - lA NO: 1 oF 2025 Petitionurrdr:.Sectionl5lCPCprayingthatintheCirCUr)StanCeSStated in the affidavit filr:r: i I support of the petition, the High C ottrt ma 7 be pleased to directtheres[)onc€,1)tNo's.3and4nottocallthepetlti.lner.stothepoliCe station, not to Iirk.: .hem sit in the police station, thereby not to prevent them in anymannerindoingtheagriculturalactivitiesintheagrrcuiturallandsi.e.,the land admeasu,inJ l\(r. 15 00 gts in Sy. No's 516' 517, 518 511) and 520 (new numbers), the o d tt rmber of the said Sy No's' is 3B1 (olcl nu nber)' the land admeasuring l\c .1 C O gts in Sy. No. 133/1, and Ac 7 00 gts rr Sy' No 380/'1 situated at Mc,kar lalle Village, Navipet Mandal, Nizamabari Di;trlct' belong to the petitioner lJo 1 ' Counsel for the P()titioners: SRI K.VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Rt:spondent Nos.1 TO 4: GP FOR HOMt: Counsel for the Rt:spondent Nos.5 & 6: - The Court made ttte following: ORDER I THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Wri No. 277 202 ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos l to 4' and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties' the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage'

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition at the admission stage and the nature of /s involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.5 and 6 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition'

3. The case of the petitroners, in brief, is that, respondent Nos 3 and 4 are calling the 1st petitioner and her maternal uncle's sons' petitioner Nos.2 and 3 herein, to the 3'd respondent police station and harassing them at the behest of unofficial respondent Nos 5 and 6 in relation to agricultural lands admeasuring Acs.15'00 guntas in Sy'Nos 516' 517 ' 5lB' 519 and 520 (new numbers), Acs'4 00 guntas in Sy'No'133/1 and Acs.7.00 guntas in Sy.No.3B0/1 situated at Mokanpalle Village' Navipet Mandal,NizamabadDistrict,whichactionoftherespondents-authoritiesit is contended as illegal, arbitrary, nothing but abusing the powers vested in them, depriving the personal liberties and violative of provisions of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constituting of India, with a consequential direction to respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to harass the petitioners' 2 G\' '\. ''r' :

4. Per c'ort,.t, Iearned Government Pleader for [lom': ap pearing on behalf of resp(:)n(ient Nos.1 to 4 would submit that ther 6tt' resp:ndent had approache d t'rt: 2'r respondent authority and lodgecl ,l ccmplatnt on

72.A5.20),, arc ,.he: 2nd respondent had forwarded the sz id r-lmplaint to the 3'd responrJrl rt to cause enquiry and to take necesr;ary acti( n.

5. Lezrn:r- ,.lovernment Pleader further submits tlat th: aforesaid complaint rdr;r:'1 by the 6th respondent on being forwardec to the 3'd responderrt,. llr: 3'l respondent made a GD entry and sun-moned the petitioner:; '5- l.he purpose of causing preliminar/ erlquiry lnto the aforesaid :orrtt ; nt. Lez rrer:l (iovernment Pleader further submlts tl-at d.rrin! the course

6. of enquilr ntc the complaint, the authorities have nctsd ilat already there are airoLrl fivc criminal cases registered against pettionel'Nos.l and 2 herein ,r.rl r :o the subject matter of complaint re at3s [o :nd dispute being a r: r,, cii:rl)ute, closed the aforesaid complaint ils 'c vil irr nature' on

13.06.2025 ,rrc also informed the petitioners of the a(ltion tak€ n thereon.

7. LeirrnerJ (iovernment Pleader fudher submits thal the r:spondents- authoritie; ,,:r:,:rt causing preliminary enquiry into t1e c:mp aint lodged by the 6| -r:s;cc ndent are not interfering in civll disputc rlr c,, lling the l't petitioner:) rr:' maternal uncle's sons, petitioner Ncs.,2 tnd J herein, to the police stirti,)n and harassing them; and that irsofar ai the other criminal -a:;e; which are pending against the petit'orters herein are i i a .,.."{ ;/ ,/ 3 concerned, the respondents-a uthorities are conducting investigation there into, in accordance with law. B. The aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 is taken on record.

9. Having regard to the submissions made as above, and taking note of the fact that the respondents-authorities having received the complaint from the 6th respondent on 22.05.2025 and after causing preliminary enquiry, having closed ihe same on 13.06.2025 as 'civil in nature', this Court is of the view that the respondents-authorities are to be directed not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioners in relation to the aforesaid complaint. Insofar as the other criminal cases registered against the petitioners are concerned, the respondents-a uthorities are fufther directed to take action strictly in accordance with law.

10. Subject to above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

11. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.A.V.S. PRASAD R DEPUTY REGIST SECTION OFFICER To 1 2 J 4 5 b PSK. BS I cretariat Buildings, The Princip al Secretary to the Home DePartme Hyderabad, State of Telangana The Commi ssioner.of Police, N izamabad Commissio Proper and District ir',JStution House Officer, Navipet Police Station, Navipet Proper and Mandal, Nizamabad District i'#'ilb-l"td"to, oiioiic", Navipet Police Station, Navipet Proper and Mandal, One CC to SRI K.VENUMADHAV, Advocate [OP-UC] i*" CC.i" Cp fOn HOUE, High Court for the State of Telangana' at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies nerate, Nizamabad _ _*-*.***'!''.1:31*,..r- .r'- :-=-*tillXIllt:?a:.:4. HIGH COURT DATED:24lAG12025 ORDER WP.No.172V'r' o12025 'o () t- Yo? lii sr, Ii, (' + 03,i I ,[l25 * \: .---' ^ .t-ll F 7_ ).I "{. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION W|THOUT 13 OSTS @GPid fu, a\r\z