The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appebrance of the Petitioners/accused No.1 & 2 in C.C.No.6025 of 2025, on the file of the V[ Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Bandi Sai Vamshi 'Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, the Additional F'ublic prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER l a\ AT ITYDERABN) THE HONOURABLE SRI JIISTICE J.SREENTVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.1697L of 2o.25 Between: Date: L7.t2.2O25 Mohd Ahmed Khan and another AND The State of Telangana, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad and another. ORDER Petitioners ...Respondents This Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash tl,e proceedings in C.C.No.6O25 of 2025, oo the file of the VII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nnmpally, Hyderabad., wherein the petitioners were afrayed as accused Nos.l and 2, for the offences punishable under I Section 324(41of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2Q23.

2. Heard Mr. Bandi Sai Vamshi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, 2 learnect Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the criminal petition. insofar as petitioner No.2/accused No.2 1S concerned, on the ground that the criminal petition was inadvertently filed seeking quashment of the proceedings, though the Investigating Officer has not fiIed anlr fina1 report against him.

4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, criminal petition against petitionr:r No.2/accused No.2 is dismissed as withdrarvn.

5. Insofar as petitioner No.1 is concerned, though the a criminal petition was filed seeking to quash the proceedirrgs in C.C.No.6025 of 2025, the learned counsel for the petitioners restricted his prayer requestirrg this Court to dispense with the appearanca 3 of the petitioner No.1/ accused No. 1 in C.C.No.6O25 of 2025, on the lile of the VII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, in view of his age. I \

6. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has not opposed the submission made by the learned counsel I I for petitioners.

7. In view of the above submissions, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the presence of the petitioner No.l/accused No. 1 in C.C.No.6O25 of 2025, on the file of the VII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, is dispensed with, subject to the condition that he shall be represented through his counsel on each and every date of hearing. If the presence of the petitioner is required a he shall appear before the trial Court. In case of his non-appear€rnce on tlre specific date fixed by the trial Court for his appearance, the trial Court is entitled to proceed with the matter, in accordance with law.

8. Accordingly, the criminal petition is disposed of. 4 R-'nding miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand <:losed. SD/- P.C.SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /,TRUE COPY/ S OFFICER To,

1. The Vll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad 2. The S;tation House Officer,Madannapet Police Station, Hyderabad 3. Two OCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.(OUT)

4. Ohe CC to Sri Bandi SaiVamshi, Advocate IOPUC] 5. Two OD Copies Sa/PSL l<s 5 HIGH C:OURT DATED:1711212025 I STAIE J[lt EI at\(J L,' t' -r{ ORDER CRLP.No.16971 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION a T<s n/'f ze [ 3303 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF AT HYDERABAD TELANGANA FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4575 OF 2022 Between:

1. Dump-ally shesh.ank, Late D.chandra fVtohan,Aged {bout 25 years, occ.:Fitness Trainer, R/o. H.No. 6-3-009/1 7911, Anano- trtag{r colony,'wc. Khairatabad, Hyderabad. (A-3) -s/o. 2 Kodali Sai Krishna, S/o. K.Murali, Aged about Flat No.402, Plbt No.14, Vijaya Enclave Apts, District. (A-5) 23 years,

3. Veltoor Vinay Kumar Reddy, S/o. V.Raghunath 12-11-503/302, Venkat Occ: Student, R/o. chilakalaguda, N/o. Ponakalu (V), Addakula (M), Mahaboob

4. Sirigireddy Yogananda Reddy, S/o. S.Anki Reddy, 9tudent, R/o. H.No. 1-2-31112, Nizampet, Cyberabad, Kadapa District, A.P. (A-8) Student, R/o. Hyderabad 22 uda, ) Occ: llage), t ...Petitioners no. 1 to 4/Accrprsed No.3,5,6,8 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Publicprosecutor High Telangana, Hyderabad .

2. Sri. P.Manikanta Raju, Sl of police, Police Station, Malakpet, a ...Respondents no. 1 & lainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr P.C praying that in the stated in the Meimorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the be pleased toto quash the FIR No 34 of 2022 dated 18/ Station House Officer; Police Station SlT, Division Detective Central Crime Station) Hyderabad which was registered aga and others alleging the offence under Section 420, 465,467 201, 109 IPC RM/ 34 IPC to secure the ends of Justice as the against the petitioners/accused are unsustainable in the eye of the continuation of the proceedings is nothing but abuse of lnterest of Justice and equity. circumstances h Court may on the file of nt, CCS ( the Petitioner ,471, 120(8), ations made and as such of law in the NO:1 2022 Petition under section 482 ot cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the vlemorandum of Grounds of criminal-petition, the High court may be ql-'qgeq !o grant stay of afl further proceedings in FrR No,34- ot 2022 dLted 18.02.2022 <rn the file of Station House officlr, police station slr, oiri"ion. Detective Delrartment, ccs ( central crime station) Hyderabad pending oispoial of the above rlriminal petition This f'etition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri suryanarayana G ,Advocate for the petitioners and sri M vivekanand Reddy, the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2 c MINAL P ITION :5957 2022 Between:

1. Aluka l{ishanth Reddv s/o. A.Madhava Reddv, Aged about22 years, occ: 2. A.Madfava Reddy, S/o. A.Rama Chandra Reddy Aged about 4g years, Occ: Pvt. Job, (A4 in FtR aiioh-t in nemana iepiif i "' PVt Job, (Both Residents of H.No. 4B-S32lSlA, Ganesh Nagar, Chintal, Hyderabad) (A-14 in Remand Reporldl2T-2_22), ...Petitioners/Accused No.4/A-g&A-1 4 AND

1. The state of reranoana and another, Rep by its public prosecutor High court of Telargana, HydErabad

2. Sri. P.Manikanta Raju, Sl of police, police Station, Malakpet, Hyderabad a ...Respondents no 1 &2/Complainant Petition ,under section 482 ol cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of criminal-peiition, the High court mav oe pleased to quash rhe FtR No 34 0f 2022 dated 18t02t20i2 0n fie fite;i 6i;tion House officer, Police station Srr, Division; Detective Department, cc-sJ c""ir"r c.rime station) Hyderabad which was registered against the petitioners herein and others alleging the offences under section 420,4d5,467,4aa,qzl,1izo-o,zoi, Tos RA / 34 IPC t, secure the ends of Justice as the'ailegation" ,aol i;;;i il" Petitioners herein are unsustainable in the eye of law and as such the co;tin;;tion of the proceedings is nothing but abuse of piocess of raw in tne rnteresioii;;ii"" and equity l.A. NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 4g2 of cr p r^ ^r^i,: stated in t-n" nr"rorandum orcror,rif.3r[;,i,ll?rjn9...,nr, in the circumstances ?i:il:i, j;:rff ,?,1":'tdl;q:li[{i1tffi r['ji*[3,.fl:[?1,,,ffi Detective Deoartment, C.CS i C"nirrf Crime Si.ti"ijl Hyderabld registered against the Petitioneis/Accuseo teie)n p-eroi,g j;i""ri'Ji'/n" This petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar pltition and upon rreaiing the argufients of sri suryanarayana G ,Advocate for the petitioners and sri M vivekanapd Reddy, the Assistant pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent Nq.l and none appeared for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: COMIUON ORDER r \-vrvr 'vst rr' rru' t above criminar petitio-n. i 'j I I I I + -=-v _// I I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO 76 5957 @: These criminar petitions are filed seeking to quash F.l.R.ltlo-34 of 2022, dated L8.O2.2O22 on the file of Station House officer', central crime station, Hyderabad District for the offence punislrable under sections 42o, 46s, 46g,471 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (,IpC, for brevity). 'when these matters are taken up for consideration, 2. Sri G.Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri M'Vivekanand Reddy, learned Assistant public prosecutor submil: that during the pendency of these criminal petitions, Investigating officer after conducting investigation, filed final report and cl:sed the compraint on the ground of rack of evidence on l5-o4jl02s- By virtue of the same, grievance of the petitioners is already resolved and no orders are required to be passed in these crimineLl petitions.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have surrendered their passports before the triar court pursua:rt to the conditions imposed by learned trial court while grantinl3 bail and the passports are before the trial court and the trial cr>urt may be directed to return the passports to the petition,:rs. t I 2 JSR, J Cil.P.Nc.,l575, 4576, 5957 OF 2022 l

4. In view of the above said submissions, by virtue of closure of complaint, the petitioners a.re entitled to file necessary applications before the trial court seeking return of passports of the petitioners as soon as the applicati<lns are filed, iearned trial eourt shall consider the same, in accordance with law, t4king into consideration the closure of complaint against fhe petitioners within a period of one (1) week from the date of filing of the applications by the petitioncrs.

5. with the aborre directions, thc criminal petitions aile disposeci of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the criminal petitions shall stand clcseci. I ! I //TRUE COPY//. SD/- REKHA RANI REGISTRAR OFFICER To,

1. 2. 3. 4.

5. 6. The VllAdditionat Chief Metro politan Magistrate at Nampally The Xll Additionat Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally The Station House Officer, Central Crime Station police Statio , Hyderabad Two CCs,to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Hyderabad.(O UT) One CC to Sri Suryanarayana G, Advocate tOpUCl Two CD Copies a Sa/ABK J, <S |/- a HIGH COURT DATED i1011012025 I t\\} i, 23JA}l2O2E )t ,( COMMON ORDER GRLP.No,.4S7 5,4576 and 5957 of 2022 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITIONS J-rcs ql'/qe