M.Mahaboob Baig v. The State Of Telangana
Case Details
Acts & Sections
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ANIRUDH SAOHU Counsel for the Respondents No 1,3 & 4: AGP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS Counsel for the Respondent No 2 : AGP FOR FINANCE & F IANNING Counsel for the Respondent No 5 : SRI PUTTA KRTSHNA R :DDy SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES. The Court made the following: ORDER / THE HONOURABLE SRI JT'STICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.16626 of 2025 ORDER:
1. Heard Mr.Anirudh Sadhu, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Roads and Buildings appearing, Sri Ram Sheinker Sharma, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning and Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities and perused the record.
2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the writ petition is filed questioning the action of thc respondents in not releasing the payment of Rs. 1,07,4 1,18O/- in respect of the construction work done by the petitioner with regard to Integrated Market (Veg & Non Veg), at TD Gutta Railway Gate in Mahabubnagar District in pursuance of the Technical Sanction Memo, Engineer-in-Chief (R&B), Buildings & NH No.126l2OL7-18, dated 02.03.2018, which is pending for several months, even after completion o[ work as per the terms of \ 2 SK,J respondent No.3 and 4 and sought a c irection to the respondents to release the payments.
3. The learned Assistant Governme et pleader for Roads and Buildings/Respondent No.3 dic not dispute the submission made by the learned. Counsel lr r the petitioner with regard to the work done by the petitioner and requested to pass appropriate orders.
4. The learned Assistant Governm,: rt pleader for Finalce and Planning, would submit that :he respondent authorities will release the amount and toli,n number also generated as 2514403352 and they ar-, I awaiting for approval of the Government and reqrr :sted to pass appropriate orders.
5. In view of the submissions made tn either side, this writ petition is disposed of by directin6 :he respondent authorities to release an amount of Rs.59 3l,4lg/_ vide token No.25114403352 dated 1g.06.2021 and another amount of Rs.47,59,76L/_, as per the l)igital Cheque 3 s,(,J No.2524374932 dt.29.O3.2O25, issued in favour of the petitioner, totailing to Rs. 1,07,41,1g0/_ (Rupees One Crore seven lakhs forty one thousand one hundred and eighty only) to the petitioner, within eight (g) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
6. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall also stand closed. SD/. C.DEEPIKA ISTANT REGISTRAR *---2 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Princioal Secretary, Roads and Buildings Department' State Of retangini, Secretariai Buildings, Hyderabad'
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning' State Of Telangand, Secretariat Buildings' Hyderabad'
3.TheEnqineerlnChief,RandBDepartmentOlo,JheEngineerinChiefOffice " dil";'Eiift, r,,tiniit, lriam Manzil Colonv, Punjasutta' Hvderabad' Telangana 500082. 4. The Superintending Eng Mahbu6nagar District, T ineer, Roads and Buildings, Mahabubnagar Circle, elangana. 5 The Municioal Commissioner, Oio. The Municipal Commissioner Office' - Mahabubnigar, MahabubnagarDistrict, Telangana' 6. One CC to SRI ANIRUDH SADHU Advocate TOPUCI T.TwoCCstoGPFoRF|NANCEPLANNING,HighCourtfortheStateof Telangana at HYderabad. [OUT] S.TwoCCstoGPFoRRoADS&BU|LD|NGS,HighCourtfortheStateof Telangana at HYderabad. [OUTI
9. One CC to SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES' loPUCl
10.Two CD CoPies D.N TKS ?$A / , HIGH COURT DATED:1 110912025 ORDER WP.No.16616 of 2025 ,.Gr$ \,,-,' f-. \ 77 ).{ r ot ilrl v !- \j \+ ( \ % L ,,..1 \i DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS Pp.c.,. q\r>\'{