✦ High Court of India · 09 Oct 2025

B. Saialesh Saxena v. 1. The Union of lndia

Case Details High Court of India · 09 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
09 Oct 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,058 words

7. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, West Zone, Hyderabad . 8. The Asst. Commissioner of Police, Asifnagar, Hyderabad. 9. The Station House Officer, Asifnagar Police Station, Hyderabad. 10.R.Srinivas, S/o R. Kistaiah, aged about 45 Yrs, Occ: Real Estate Agent, Rl/o 7 -2-581 1582, Burgushetty Bazaar, Secunderabad.

11. R. Krishna Kumar, S/o R. Kistaiah, aged about 43 Yrs, Oc,c: Real Estate Agent, R:/o 7 -2-5811582, Burgusheety Bazaar, Secunderabad-

12. P.Thirmal Reddy, S/o P.Venkat Reddy, aged about 48 Years, Occ: Private Service R/o Shamirpet, R.R. District.

13. Venkata Raya Verma Vegesna, Occ. M.D- Vertex Corporate, 4th Fbor, Plot No.8 and 9, Jubilee Enclave, Opp Hitex Enterprise Madhapur, Hyderabad. 14.M. Shiva Bhusan, S/o Rajaiah, aged about: 63 Yrs, Occ: Real Estate, Agent Rt/o Attapur, Hyderabad. l5.Hasbeeb lslam Khan, S/o Late Qutubuddin lslam Khan, aged about: 66 Years, R/o Goshamahal, Hyderabad.

16.Najmuddin lslam Khan, S/o Late Nizamuddin lslam Khan, aged about: 48 Yrs, 17,lftekhar lslam Khan, S/o Late Khaleeluddin lslam Khan, aged about: 54 Yrs, R/o Goshamahal, Hyderabad R./o Goshamahal, Hyderabad.

18.Ali Mohamrned, S/o Mirza Qudharthullah, aged about: 53 Yrs, Occ: Land Grabbing No 224-43111, Kotla Alijah, Hyderabad.

19. NayeenaKhan, S/o Not known, aged about: 55 Years, Occ: Land Grabbing R/o 8-1-399/50, Janaki Nagar, Tolichowki, Hyderabad.

20.M.H. Farooqui, S/o not known, aged about. 55 Years, Occ: Land Grabbing, R/o 8-1-399150, Janaki Nagar, Tolichowki, Hyderabad.

21. Nazir Ahmed Khan, S/o not known, aged about: 47 Years, Occ: Mvocate, R:/o 10-2-1 1 I 4, A.C. Guards, Saifabad, Hyded rabad.

22. Avodhva Naqar Co-operative Housing Society, rep. by its Secretary' KlMalleshwa-r Rao Rio H.No.3-3-76/1, Kings Way Sescur jerabad' Zg.EiangaiiPraiash, S/o not known, Oci: Cofooratdr TRS t) rrty, Guddimalkapur, Za.fUl nivinaer Reddy, S/o not known, aged about: 63 Yearr , Occ Retd Govt' - 5"*""t tlh" tnen'5.o.ut-c), R/o Plot-No.138, Near sai I aba Temple, D'D' Hvderabad. Colony, BaghamberPet, HYderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the ligh court may be pleased to issue an order, direction particularly one in t 1 ) nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ (i) declare the actic,t of the Police in not registering FIR against the unofficial respondents in purt;r ance of petitioners written complaint dated 11-04-2017, 17-07-2017 and 1,t 18-2017 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of the natural justice and fundamental ricjl t guaranteed by the constitution of lndia, as well as against the legal ratio laid lown by the Honble Apex court in Lalitha Kumaris judgment and consequently r ay direct the official respondents to register the FIR against the unofficial respond:nts in pursuance of petitioners wriften complaint dt.11-04-2017, 17-07-2017 and 14'08-2017 with an immediate effect in the interest of justice and pass such othe:t order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. l.A. NO: 1OF 2017 (WPMP. NO:39.[84 oF 20't7l Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the ci1 umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court mztr be pleased to direct the official respondents to register case against the unoffici,: respondents basing on petitioner above said complaints dt.11-04-2017, 17-07 2 )17 and 14-08-2017 and to take necessary action as per law, pending dispor; Ll of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. A SRINATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRI N. BHUJANGA RAO, SC FOR GENTRAL GOVERNMENT Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 to 9: GP FOR HOME (TG) Counsel for the Respondent No. 10to24: -- The Court made the following: ORDER 1 TTIE HONOI'RABLE SRI JT'STICE N.TUI ERAMJI WRIT PEIITION No.31718 0F 2017 ORDER: This Writ Petition is frled under r\:ticle 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relir f/s:- ) n...to issue an order, direction partianlarlg one it of Writ of Mandamus or ang otler appropiate ut; the -section of tlw Polie in not regi'steing FIII unofficial respondents in pursuane of petitirn complaint dated 11-04-2017, 17-07-2017 onal as itlegal, orbitrary, uiolation of tlrc nahtral fundamental right guaranteed bg the anstitu|t as u.tell as against tle legal ratio laid down bu Apex Court in Lalitha Kumai's judgment and < mog direct tle olficial respondents to regis against the unofficial respondents in pt) petitione rs uritten amplaint dt. 1 7 -O4 -2 0 1 7' 1 7 - t 14-08-2017 tttith an immediate effect in th'e inter ond pass such other order or orders ntay d proper in the ciranmstances of tle case..." the nafitre it (i) declare agoinst the ers tDitten 14-08-2017 iustice and n of Indio, the Hon'bLe tnseqtentlY er the FIR 'suonce of t7-2O17 and st of justice rcm fit ond

2. When the matter is taken up for hearin 1, Mr'A'Srinath Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner sou ght permission of this court to withdraw the writ Petition u ith a liberty to avail other remedies available under law.

3. Perrnission is accorded. 2

4. Accordingly, the writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand. closed. SD/. A.SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 ,TTRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRl. A SRINATH REDDY, Advocate IOPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME [fG), High Court for the State of Telangana. 3. bne CC to SRI N. BHUJANAGA RAO, (SC FOR CENTRAL IOUI GOVERNMENT) Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies MMT PSK hy HIGH COURT DATED:0911012025 ORDER l WP.No.31718 of 2017 1H[ Er .9 C )( 09'rl?CliE (,1 * trF o t .(i t DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS V 'ITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS v \,)

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments