✦ High Court of India · 12 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 12 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
12 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,139 words

Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in registering the crime against the petitioners/accused No.2 and 3 vide FIR No. 1'18/2021 dated 201712021 basing on the on the false complaint made by the respondent No 3 as arbitrary and illegal and without any jurisdiction consequently to quash the crime No. 11812021 daled 201712O2'l on the file of respondent No.2 lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thrr lircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High C< r rt may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 not to take any coerci,,{ steps against the petitioners/Accused No.2 and 3 in Crime No 11812021 da ed 2Ol7l2O21 on the file of Station House Officer, Central Crime Police statio^ Hyderabad pending disposal of the above writ petition lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thr ;ircumstances stated in thd affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cr r rt may be pleased to extend the interim order dated 271081202'l in WP No 203ii of 202i until further orders lA NO: 4 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the )rrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cc r . may be pleased to extend stay order dated 2810912021 and extension orde - dated 2810912O21 in W.P.No. 20383 of 2021 for Period this Hon'ble Court deen I f it lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ;ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou 1 may be pleased to extend stay which initially granted vide order dated 271( { 1.2021 and extended vide order daled 2411212021 in W.P.No. 20383 ot 2021 lr period this Hon'ble Court deems fit lA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co I 1 may be pleased to extend stay, which initially granted vide order dated 27-(t -2021 and extended vide order dated 07-02-2022 in W.P.No.20383 of 2021 f,t period this Hon,ble Court deems fit lA NO: 3 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the , ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co I t rnay be pleased to extend stay, which initially granted vide order dated 27-Ct ..>_021 and extended vide order dated 10-03-2022 in W.P.No.20383 of 2021 fit period this Hon'ble Court deems fit lA NO: 4 OF 2022 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the ( ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co I t may be pleased to extend stay, which initially granted vide order dated 27lCt ,I>_021 and extended vide order dated 0610412022 inw.P No 20383 of 201 tor Fr r-iod this Honourable court deems fit lA NO: 5 OF 2022 Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the r ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High corr t may be pleased to extend stay,' which initially granted vide order dated 27-oB ;1021 and extended vide order dated 29-04-2022 in w.F.No.20383 of 2021 f(r period this Hon'bte Court deems fit lA NO: 3 OF 2021 Between:

1. State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department 2. The Station House officer, Central Crime Station Police Station Hyderabad Secretariat, Hyderabad. District .....pEaroNERS/RESpoNDENTs 1&2 AND '1 . G.lvlohan Babu, S/o late G.V.Swamy Aged about 62 years Occ business, H.No. 34, f\llodel colony Flat No. 203, Raghunatha Nilayam BK Guda, Hyderabad. 2. B.Veda Vyas, S/o Niranjan Rao Aged about 62 years Rl/o 1 12, Prasasan nagar Jubilee hills, Hyderabad.

3. The Aishwarya Chakkilam, D/o late C.Raghuram H.No 6-3-662/1 611, Jaltar Ali Bagh Somajiguda, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS/3.d RESPONDENT Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 271O812O21 in W.P No 20383/2021 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAJA SHEKAR RAO SALVAJI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to2: SRI B. SRIDHAR, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Ms. T. NIHARIKA REP SRI N. NAVEEN KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER ':-*;+.:..:,... THE IrON,BLE SRI JUSTTCE J. SREENII/ SS RAO WRIT PETITION No.2O3a3 of 2o21 ORDER: Ms.T.Niharika, learned counsel representin p liri N.Naveen Kumar, learned counsel appearing for responderL No.3 and Sri B.Sridhar, learned Assistant Government Plead:' for Home is present.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing trls.S.Sirisha, learned counsel representing Sri Raja Sheka: Rao Salvaji, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted th,r the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudic rtion on the ground that during the pendency of the wn cetition, the Investigation Officer, after conducting the inve s l..gation, hled final report.

3. In view of the above submission, the cat r e, in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No r:, ,s;ts Pending miscellaneous petitions, if an1. shall stand \/- closed. SD/.I I, JAWAHAR REDDY At S ISTANT REGISTRAR il't' ( SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, .,8":,::' k-,

1. One CC to SRI. RAJA SHEKAR RAO SALVAJI, Advcc r':e IOPUCI u^,,jrA.-.

2. f wo CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies BM BS fitq. HIGH COURT DATED:1210912025 ORDER WP.No.20383 ot 2021 t(! : if-: ^'-.r i i riu o /4J r:.,... 'o^lltr ?"ir t.. ',' : ! { r t:r.rl ir; ){: 't_, . r:_ \...,,; tj.. :'r,\. +'-'\;! * () s -:. PATCK l1 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHo JTCOSTS &'tt^. A)-b' b

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments