High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent No. 4 and 5 in calling the petitioner to the police station and making the petitioner to sit in the police station and threatening to get settle the issues with the respondent No. 2 and the persons belong to the iespondent No.6 in regarding with the land of the petitioner admeasuring Ac. 1.00 gts, (4840 Sq. yards) in sy. No. 796, situated at Venkatapuram H/o. Korremula Village, Ghatkesar trrlandal, Medchal lVlalkajgiri District, is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, null and void and violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia' Consequently direct the respondent No.4 and 5 authorities not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to pressurize the petitioner to get settle the issues pertaining to his above stated Iand, thereby not to harass him. . lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou!.t may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 4 and 5 authorities not to call the petitioner to the police station and not to pressurize the petitioner to get settle the issues Pertaining to his land admeasuring Ac. '1 .00 gts. (4840 Sq. yards) in Sy. No. 796, situated at Venkatapuram H/o. Korremula Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal t\/alkajgiri District, thereby not to harass him. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.VENUMADHAV Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.6: - The Court made the following: ORDER w THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR IV.P.No. L6894 of 2Q25 ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, the learned Gover-rrment Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondent Nos.1 to 5, and with their consent, the Writ t)etition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage Having rcgard to the mannel of disposal of the Writ Petition and thc 2. nature of lis involved, this.Court is of the view that noticc to unoffrcial respondent No.6 is not rlecessarl/ lbr adjudication of the present Writ Petilion

3. Thc casc of the pctiticncr, in brief, is that though there exists civil disputes bctrvecn thc petitioner arrd the unofhcia-l respondent herein, the respond ents-aut.horities, in particular respondent Nos.4 & 5 are ca-lling the petitioner to the police station and malcing him to sit for hours togethcr in the namc of invcstigal.ion, t"{-rich i-tctiorr of tirc respondents it is contended as highly illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India. 4 Per conlnr, learncd Governtnent Pleader appearing on behalf of officia-l respondents, w)-rilc deniring the lvrit avel:ments, lvould contend that a case uid-e Crirne No.23O 12023, dL.16.O9.2O23, has bcen registered against the petitioner and that the authorities after causing investigation into the aforesaid crime have also filed charge sheet therein before the concerned Maglstrate uicJe Irrward No.25O 1i 2025, dt.27.O5.2025. ,? ,,4 -/ 2

5. Learned Gorremment pleadcr furthcr sub,tits that sLnce , the authorities have completed investigation into the aforesard crimc and rrred a charge sheet before the concerned Magistrate, therc is no n<:cessity for the authorities to call the petitioner to the porice sta tion arid nakc hLm ro sit in the police slation from morninq rill evcrring.;rs all^gcd.

6. Learned Government pledder furtl_rer subn_rits that since, the respondents-authorities have alrezrdy filed a charge sheet bt:lore the concemed Court, which is pending for taking cognizance by thc concerned Court, the respondents-au thorities are not interferi,g *rith the life :rnd libert' of the petitioner. 7 The aforesaid submission made b.v [hc leaLr.ed Gover.,rnent pleader for Home is taken on record 8 In view of thc aforesard submissior.t made and having rcgard to the fact that the rcspondents-au thorities having registered a case uide Cr.No.23O /2023, dt.16.09.2023, and a,rer conducing investigation having filed charge sheet before the concerned Crurl uic.le lnrvard lyo.25o l l2O2S on 27 'O5'2025, this court is of the 'iew Lhat rhe respondents-authorities are to be directed not to interfere with the life and libcrty of flre peritioner, except in accordar-rce with law 9 Subject to the above direcl.ion, the Writ petitron is cisposecl of No order as to costs a 3

10. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall staad closed sD/'P'c-!'Nastl3;Sf#i //rRUE coPY/, ,ecrbfiorrrcen To

2. J. 4. q o 7 B PSK. TKS The Principal Secretary, Home Department' Secretariat Buildings' Hyderabad' State of Telangana. i;;6.;i;i";.;r. of Poli"", Rachakonda commissionerate' Neredmet' Hvderabad. Aisistant Commisioner of Police, Malkajgiri^Division 'lr4alkajgiri' ffi'il:;lr;6; ;i' p" iit". F. s'p"'thaiam' ii corriaor' Poch a ra m' Ivledch a l- I\.4alkaioiri District. if""Sl"bl;;;;;i", of Police, P.S. Pocharam lT Corridor' Pocharam' tVledchal-tvlalkaigiri District. liXEtc' ti'S*ni'RvEr.ruMnoHAV, Advocate loPllql i# E6.'i"'G'i'iOA UOVrel uigd court for ti.re srat-e of Telangana' at Hvderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies Hyderabad' G-- -i I l i ,1 i I I I HIGH COURT DATED:2010612025 ORDER WP.No.16894 of 2025 '1 El. :i lrt ,".,c'\ .a' 28 AlJ6 zffi \ ,.- \ '',; \.* ^ \--'/ ; ti' o C (r a ;. I ,! DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS