✦ High Court of India · 18 Jun 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 18 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
18 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,268 words

Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of .....RESPONDENTS I writ of Mandanr,-r ,;, (l,rclaring the arbitrary action of the respon,lent police in directing petitio re - r ot to enter into the petitioner's p,rlttia lar c situated in Sy.no.262 to an ?xl()1t of Ac.1-20 gnts of Sarapaka Vi lag:, B'rrgam Pahad Mandal, g6s(16rlr Kcthagudem District, without registerinlr ar)'crirle against the petitioner, interfe rl rg rrith the civil disputes between the pe-itior er a rd respondent 3 is;tering any crime against the resporr lent no 6 to 8, inspite no.6 to 8, without -er of petitioner,s writ,er :omplaint dtd.13 06.2025, inspite of ttris l.lon'rle High court orders passed irr lA I',|,r.1 of 2023 in cRP.No.924 of 2023 (jtd.il4.0l .2023 and the same is extend_.c f rrrn time to time and is still in force, wi'hou giving police protection to the p::titrcner and his family members, is illegal, rroid ard opposed to articles 14, 19, 2' alc 300-4 of Constitution of lndia, and conseqt ently to direct the respondent l( irc€ to grant police protection to the peti..iorrer's ife and liberty by taking neceslia.y action against unofficial respondents itt ac;t;orditnce with law. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition t-,n,ier Section 151 CPC praying that in the C rclmstz nces stated in the affidavit file I in :;upport of the petition, the High Co I rt rnay be pleased to direct the respc n rlelt police to give police protection to the petiiioner and his family members bv r; [:ing necessary action against the ret;po tder t No.6 to B, in connection with t'e rand situated in Sy.no.262 to an ext()nt of A.;1-20 gnts of Sarapaka Villa,le Eirrrgam Pahad Mandal, Bhadradri Ko;hag rdem District, pending disposz I rf 'lrr; above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MUMMANENI SRINIVASA' RAO Counsel for the Resgrr>ndent Nos.1 to 5 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Res 6xrndent Nos.6 to 8 : -- The Court at the $;tagc! of admission made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P.No.1653O of 2025 ORDER: Heard lealned counsel for thc pctitioner, learned Government Plcader lor I{omc ap;:earing lbr rcsponclcnt Nos. I to 5, and wiLh their consent, the Writ Petition is takcn up for hearing and disposal at admission stagc.

2. Ilaving regard to thc manner of disposnl of the rvrit petition and thc nature of li.s involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondents is not necessary lbr adjudi<;ation of thc present Writ I)erltion

3. The r:ase of Lhc petitioner, in bricl, is Lhat iht-- Stn respondcnt is dirccting the petitioner not to enler intc ]ris patLa land ad-mcasuring

1.20 guntas in survey No.262 sittiaicd at Sarapaka Vitlage, Buram Pahad Manda1, Bhadradri l(othagudem DisLrict, without registering aly crime against thb petitioner, thcreby intcrfering in the civil disputcs bctwccn the peLitioner and unofficial respondents, which action of the respondcnts it is contended as highly illegal. arbitrary, in violation of Aruicles 14, 19,21. & 3O0A of thc Constitution of India ern also in violzrtion of orders of this Court, dL.24.O3.2O23 in tA.No. 1 of 2023 itt CltP-No.924 of 2023. .- ,=*-ffi ' r"'it-':_- ' 2

1. l),:r respond:r petitionr r' lodged l au1 horiL (' en1ry ani .r'. r.1r.i. Iearned GovcrnmenI pleadcr- altpe: ;.irr: .n behalf of ::i r hilc denying thc writ averments u,(, jl(l :iLtlt rit that the l-,:',:in had approached the responde rtts. :rr rtl rorities and ,,r rrplaint on 13.06.2O2S; ar-rd thar tl-c .,sponrlcnts_ r, r t-r'i:cir.ing thc aforesaid complarn it r, r.1aflg s 611 'rrr r:tlrsing enquirv into the aforesaid c()ml) atill

5. Lc'...t.t, c (iovernmcnt l)lc:rdcr furthr:r :rrllr-i:; that the authoriti:: ( .i I rpt causing enquiry into the contcrr,-s r I rrr complaint iodgr:d 11.. r . cliliollcr herc.in ure not interfqring itr arL.. r.r .rl disputes nor I hc-\. : rr- r 1 r,tl thc pctitioncr not to enter inlo his :; r i. as bcing claimcd 1,,,, r inr

6. LeiL:-'c,1 Ciovcrnment plcacler would further . bmiL thaL inasmucl ,s. , s ol clatc, no c:omplaint is rcceivctl n( r :tl ). crime is rcgisterer ii1::i tsL thc peLitioncr, thcre is lto rr(,((,ssi:r y. tbr the autl'roritit s. ,r i.,.c,r[cre in the civil disputes tl,ra L rn:r" (:]i sr ll rt\\,cen thc petitionc'r : rr,' tlt(, unofficial rcspondent nor dircct thc 1r,:p tioncr nol to enter ir ,r , [1 1 ; 1',,-16

7. The rfor:said submission made by the lezr -nr: l (-i ,r,6p1.r^"r_r, Pleader lo' r tL,r rs Laken on record

8. IJa\ i- rl note o{ tl.r r. ' ,t crrlTlc ts ra,9 r .r1ard to the submissions made as rrl),.r,(: .ltd takrng : -- that, as of date, no complaint is re,::it r, r I nor any t( d irg;ril1st thc pr:titioncr, this Court, is 0.llt: ricu that 3 the respondents-au thorilics arc to be resLrained from interfering in the civrl dispul.cs that may exist bctwcen the pctitioner and the unofficial respondents in relation Lo the immovablc property and in the event of any complaint being lodged against the petitioner with regard to law & order, the respondr nts-authorities are directed to take action, sLrictly in accordance w,ith lau,. 9 Subject to the above directions, the Writ petrtion is disposed of No ordcr as to cosls I O. Consequently, miscelLaleous petitions, if any, pencling shall stand closed. Sd/. S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO S TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII ECTION OFFICER t, State of Telangana To

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secret

2. The Superintendent of Police, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Palavoncha' Bhadradri Kothagudem at Hyderabad. District.

4. The Circle lnspector of Police, Palavoncha Police Station, Palavoncha, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

5. The Station House Officer, Burgampahad Police Station, Burgampahad, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court forthe State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI

7. O'ne CC to SRI MUMMANENI SRINIVASA RAO, Advocate IoPUC] 8. Two CD Copies SA PVL \q- HIGH COIJRT DATED:1810612025 I' I t . lE Ao ( i o't ,tut ?ffi z a t Or- S,,-1ICL, a==--'-=tz / i I I I I I I I ORDER WP.No.16530 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STT,GE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. \\ ""*<at Tx",

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments