The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned award dated 19.06.2006 made in 1.D.No.26t2003, Labour Court-ll, Hyderabad published on 23.10.2006 in G.O.rt.No.1894, directing the petitioner to reinstate the 1't respo6ent into service with continuity of service and full back wages and all other attendant benefits and quash the same as being bad, illegal, without jurisdiction and invalid Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to order Stay of execution of Award dated 19.06.2006 made in 1.D.No.2612003, Addl. lndustrial Tribunal-cum-Addl. Labour Court, Hyderabad published on 23.10.2006 in g.O.rt.No.1894 except in regard to reinstatement, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders in the interest of Justice. Gounselfor the Petitioner: SRl. N. SRUSHMAN REDDY (sc FoR TGSRTC ZONE 1 ) Counselfor the Respondents: GP FOR LABOUR The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHTIIAR RAO WRIT PETITIOT{ No.61O5 OF 2OO7 ORDER: Pursuant to the request made by the Counsel appearing for both the Parties, the matter ltras reierred to Lok Adalat.

2. Accordingly, the matter was settled before the Lok Adalat and an award was passed by the Lok Adalat on 15. lL.2025.

3. [n vierv of the above, the preserrt Writ Peitition is disposed of in terms of the a,*,ard passed by the Lok Adalat. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous appiicatiorls. if any, pending in this Writ Petitiotr, shall stand closed. Sd/.B. REKHA ANT REG //TRUE COPY// OFFICER \ To, Labour Court, HYderabad.

1. The Chairman cum Presiding Officer, Addl. lndustrial, Tribunal cum Addl' 2. onJcclo Snr.'il-inujilrranu REDDY (SC FoR TGSRTC zoNE 1 ) a. [TJ"%s to Gp FOR LABOUR ,High court for the State of rerangana at 4. Two CD CoPies Hyderabad [OUT] ,N/ B M/DAN \ /l I HIGH COURT DATED i2511112025 ORDER WP.No.6105 ot 20AT lr, 2 5 iltfiR (a () t * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION INTERMS OF THE LOKADALAT WITHOUT COSTS BEFORE THE LOK HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMATITTEE I, I I [itnder Secllon l9 of lhe Legol Services Aultrodlies Act, 1987 (Cenlrol Act)t FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDE SER m t HIGH LOK t Stale ol 1 11- 25 Present:1. Hon'ble Sri Justice B.R.lrtadhusudhan Rao, (Judge, Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana) Chalrman

2. Sri D.Narendar Naik, Advocate, Member P 105 of (Before the Hon'ble High Court) Between:- The Depot Manaler, A.P.S.R.T.C., Kukatpauy bus Depot, Kukatpatly X Roads, Kukatpally, Hyderabadl A,P. r AND

1. A. Chennaiah, S/o. Pentaiah, aged 41 years, Driver, ' APSRTC; E.209894, Kukatpatly Bus Depot, Hyderabad-A.P. C/o.l.P. Joe[ Gen. Sec. & Representative, APSRTC Employees & Workers Union, Regd. No.H- 1 0, Door Nos. 1 2-4-288 &. 1 1 -4-77 I 78, Chilkalguda, Sec'bad, A.P.500 061. :

2. The Chairman-cum-Presiding Officer, Addt.'lndustriat Tribunat-cum-Addl. Labour'Court, Hyderabad. ...Petitioner - :The above case between the parties having been referred for determination to the LOK ADALAT and the parties having compromised the case / matter, the foltowing Award is passed in terms of the setttement: Sri P.N.M. Chary, Law Officer for TGSRTC representing the petitioner is present. Respondent No.l is present in person along with his wife viz., Smt.A:Madhavi and is represented by his counsel. Respondent No.1 produced his originat Aadhar Card before the Bench. The Law Officer representing the petitioner submits that the Respondent No.2 is a formal party to the present Writ Petition. Memorandum of Understanding dated 15- l 1'2025 fited before the Bench is signed by the Petitioner, Law Officer appearing for the Petitioner, Respondent No.1 and learned counsel-Sri A.Venkateshwartu, appearing for the .) Respondent No.1 . The Labour Court has passed an award on 19-06-2006 directing the Respondent-Corporation to reinstate Respondent No.1 (Sri A.Chennaiah- E.No.209894) into service with continuity, futt back wages and all other attendant benefits. The Memorandum of Unde6tanding goes to show that petitioner - TGSRTC has chattenged the Award 19.O6.2N6 passed by the Additionat lndustriat Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Court, Hyderabad, in lD No.26 of 2003 by fiting the present Writ Petition. During the pendency of the Writ Petition, Respondent No.1 gave a representation before the petitioner-TcsRTc on 27.09.2025 requesting to settle matter before Lok Adatat and he is witting to forego back wages ,as No.26 of 2003 dated 19.06.2006. qwarded The petitioner has agreed to pay the retirement benefits to Respondent -Sri A.Chennaiah-E.No.209894 without back wages as awarded in HIGHcouRl LOK ADAIAI --{ m a4 i I Slale ol lD.No.26 of 2003. Accordingly, compromise is recorded and the Award is,passed as per the terms stated in Memorandum of Understanding. The said Memorandum of Understanding shatt form part of the award and there shalt be no costs. The parties are informed that the court fee, if any, paid on this petition shalt be refunded. ln token of consent for the above setttement and award, the parties and their counsel have signed this award in our presence. ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the Writ Petition No. 6105 of 2007 shatt stand disposed of. sd, @ { 6torq DaoT Appeltant (s) Respondent (s) ,o) q LAW OFFICER-II TGSRTC Bus Bhavan, HYd. Counsel for the Appellant (s) Counsel for the Respondent (s) k+* CHAIRAAAN 4- oJ 1tt"5qffit )a- \ ER \bl> ,rsb. )