High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
Petition under si'l:tion 151 cpc praying that in the c ircu rn st;,rnces stated in the affidavit fired irr s;rrpport of the petition, the High court may br,: preased to direct the Responderts tc consider the representations dated 22-10-2024 and 06-06-2025 of the p.ti-i rners pending disposar of the main writ p€ tition in the interests of justice. Counsel for the petitione rs; M/s. DEVARA SAMHITHA Counsel for the Resp,lncent No.1: Cp fOn SEiVfCeS f f counsel for the Respr:ndent Nos.2 io iiini-nib.aonr,reru, sc FOR rGGENco The Court made the foltr:wing: ORDER TH EH N, L sRI USTI NCE AM AV U RAJ ESHWAR RAo P ET NI 7 F o ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners seeking the following relief: "... to issue writ direction or order more pafticularlY one in nature of writ of mandamus under Articte 226 of Constitution of India declaring the action of the Respondents in not coDsidering the representations dated 22-10-2024and06-06-2025madebythePetiionersandinno!effectinq promotions to the Petitioners who are the etigible candidates from the cadrcofAssistantManagerllRevenafterthetapseof6yeafsaftertheir recruitmentintheYear2olsasittegalarbitraryexcessiveandviolative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of India and atso principals of naturat lustice and consequeotly direct the Respondents to consider the representations dated 22-10-2024 and 06-06-2025 of the Petitioners without any reference to the pending cases in Hon'ble High Court in relation to the principle of Consequential SenioritY aod effect prcmotions b the etigible candidates from the cadre of Assistant Manager (HR) to Deputy Manager (HR) bY fo ownq the rules and regulations in force in accordance with law and in the interests of justice and to pass " " 2 petitioners, HeardMs.DevaraSamhitha,learnedcounselforthe learned Government Pleader For Services-Il for the respondent No.1 and Sri Md'Adanan' learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4' Perused the TGGENCO, aPPearing for material on record' 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that all the writ petitioners are the employees of the respondent No'2/Corporation and were appointed as "Assistant Manager' Human Resource (HR)" in Septembe r, 2O7B through direct recruitment' vide notiflcation No.l/CGM/(Adm)/2018, OateO f Z-O+-2018' Upon completion of the - ) probation prlricl(l lf (2) years, their services were regularized, and their seniori,:y rr,;*; fixed based on the merit ranking .btained in the selection lis;t t-he amendment to part_III of ApSE B service regulations rv,r:; irrtroduceo vide G.O.O.No.75lJS(per)/2008, dated 17-05-2008. Jrrrlr:r the heading of '.Constitution,, r:laur;e(a) was added in all the rrasses, reading to a hierarchar posts in the Human Resource strearn However, under the said system, the petitioners have been clec-i'rr:d of their promotions. To the said relief, the petitioners r-I1arl€r a representation before the auth(:rities on 22-10-2024 and cn 06-06-2025 for the same retief,
4. Learned :.urrsel for the respondents submitted that.:.hey have no objection rf i_h3 -epresentation is Cisposed of. 5. In view of tf,e above submissions made by ihe bot.r learned counsel, the rr::;tcndent authorities are directed to con:;ider the representations certed 22_lO-2024 and O6_06_;2021; and pass appropriate c,rrlr-,-; in accordance with law, as ,3xpeditirusly as possible, prefr:rarl,,within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a c.t;:y of this order. 6. with th* a:.ve direction, the writ petition is dis;posed of at the admission sra(J,l itserf. There shail be no order as to cosrs. Asasequel,miscellaneousapplicationspending,ifany,inthis -) Writ Petition, shall stand closed' //rRUE coPY/, ,3Bl?J-'e3'EtitR ,r"i\B$orr,"r* To it[t'1,H,]T.ilisJi?a,s[fi3d;.,i?JiJis,yfj,',L:H,",t:3:fi""0'l%o,o '1 . The Principal Secretary' Energy Department' State of Telangana' State of , " ?fl';an,", General Manag-er (Adm) TGGENCo' Vidyut Soudha' Khairtabad' , +X::'.Slt'd"I?SlHiiti;!!!.".1i to o t * t o' Vidvut Soud ha' Kha irtabad' ;PI?"3f,t{##E*.*4ffi l1fl ,#s"":,i?J:,[ygL-orreansanaat , BI1"3t?3.k1'*tJ oro*oN, sc FoR TGGENC. toPUCl -uoo Two CD CoPies 8 PSK. BS v HIGH COURT DATED:191061?.A25 ORDER WP.No.16766 o,1'2025 I t .a' ,/,.< //,.-'. ,J,o o '+ I \: : :\ 2 q -' --- --- . =i,: -9 .6 * DISPOSING OF' HE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ,// 1.2 z?/,4r