M/s. GIRIDHARI S VUE, ReP bY v. 1. The State of Telangana

Counsel for the pe titioners : SRI THAKUR ROOPA STNGH Counsel for the Res grondent No.1 : Gp FOR ENERGY 9:y.t-"1!gfe IResprondent Nos.2 & 3: SRt N.SREEDHAR REDr)y, SC FoR SOUTHERN POVVEII DISTRIBUTION COMPANidFiC.oTCETT LIMITED 9::S1 for the frlespondenr Nos.4 & 5 : SRt V.NARASHTMA GOL D, SC FOR HYDERABAD M E: TI] OPOLITAN DEVE LOPM CiJi EUrrrONrrV The Court at the sta;e of admission made the following ORD ER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETTTION No.1667O OF 2025 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This Writ Petition is filed, under Articl e 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the follou'ing relief: "...to issue wit or(ler or directiort nore patticularly one in tLTe nalure of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directittg the respondents 2 to 3Io prouide electicit! connectiott exlension of seruice fttr regktration H'l'73950397 connectnn lo the Residential Buitding, in Suroelj No-46, aclrneasuing Ac-O 32 Cunt."s, situdted at Kismdthpur (v) & C.P., Rdjendranagar (M), Rclt..g,r Rc.ldg Distict' T'S ' bounded by North: SurueA No.44 & Hanumdrt Temple; South: Road; East: SurueA No.45; west: Part of Suruey No.46 Belongs to M/ s'Giidhari's Vue' Witho;t insisting upon occupancA certiJicate from the 4th and sth respondent Ly hoLding that thi rifusal to prouide etecticity conrLechon to tle referred premises is illegal and arbrtrary and pass..." 'aboue

3. Heard Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners; learned Government Pleader for Energr for respondent No.1; Sri N.sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, for respondent Nos.2 and 3; and Sri V Narashima Goud, learned Standing Counsel for Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, for respondent Nos.4 and 5.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matter of this Writ'Petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.6O30 of 2O2O, dated 2O'O4'202O, and requested '.ri .t '.. rT ' ., ..t 2 PI\ this Cortr i 1( pass similar order in the present Writ p:tition also. The sar-rc is not seriously disputed by the le.arn rrl ( io,,.ernment Plcader as l.cll as learned Standing Counsel for the r-esp onclents.

5. In r'lc'r tf the above submissions and for r_he t.cas rns alike in tl-re ordcr :rl'rlLis Court in W.p.No.6O3O of 2O2O, dalecl i O.04.2O2O, this Wri.. i)eti-.on is disposed of directing the resoonrlcnts to release the por,:r s -rp ply to the premises of the petitioners su rject to the compliatrt--:: r,1 the terms and conditions and on frLr-rishir-rg an undertaliir g .o produce the occupancy cer.tifi( atc liom the cor-rcernr:d M r nicipal Corporation within a presc ribc 1 pe rior1, and if no such o, c',1 pancy certificate is produced withi;-r sl ch period, it is open to th: r:spondents to take appropriate action in ,rccordance rvith lau, Misc,:l I rreous petitions pending, if any, s;l,ral stz nd closed. There sh a I . 1-,c no order as to costs. SD/ M. NAGAMAN] ,/ ISTANT REGISTRAR / q AS A. //TRUE COPY// l .i SEi:)TION OFFICER ',. ,n" Pri rc'pl iecretary' p-o-ry"^'^lnd Energy Depa\ttrrent Secretariat' State of , }fif t'g ;:,. lff 'fi :'.'J:3';i".11: :^iI; g; P owe r I i st r b uti o n c o m p anv of Telanqirrr' St't" Ltti'l:;;ii'jits Corporate office at 6-' -50 Mint Compound' *'otl|l]l'i:::fltt Ensineer' operation Raiendranasar cirr le/r G s P DC L' , 4. The Conrmit;s;ioner' Bandlaguda Jagir Municipal Corporltior ' Bandlaguda' Raiendra retStar' HYdererb 'rd ' i I I . i I I I i I I I I ; I I i

5. The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority' District Commercial O. iwo'CC, to Gp FOR ENERGY, High Court for the State of Telangana at Complex, Administrative L.Block, Tarnaka, Hyderabad' Hyderabad. [OUT] Z. One CC to SRt THAKUR ROOPA SINGH, Advocate [OPUC] e. On" CC to SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF TELANGANA LIMITED 9. One CC to SRI V.NARASHIIVA GOUD, SC FOR HYDERABAD -' TVETROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY' Advocate (OPUC) '10.Two CD CoPies iAl.;; *itr'r ir't" Copy of Court Order dt:20104t2o20 in W'P'No' 6030 ot 2020 SA GJP W \ H|GH COTJR-r \ DATED:1 t\11X612025 l I I C.C. TODAY ORDER WP.No.16$7'0 of 2025 o )( \ ( +. =.=S I4i THE e 2 ri Jil"i ?lI 7 s, b 'l-:'.-; -- \' ,""" ' ,.::,1 DISPOSINIS OF THE W.P AT THE ST"AGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT C0STS. LoP(eL \e THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.6O30 OF 2O2O ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for the fol.lowing relief "...to issue aI] approPriate writ, order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandarnus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the power supply to the petitioner building at premises bearing Ftot Nos.4oO and 40I admeasuring 480 scl yards in Sy.Nos.28, 29 & 30, situated at BachuPally Village and iram Panchayat, Bachupa.lly Mandal, Medchal-Malkaj giri District- as illegal, null, void, arbitrar1r and consequently direct the respondents to release the power supply ivithout insisting for occupalcy certilicate. '. "

2. When the matter is taken up, it is submittetL t'r1' the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised in the present Writ Petition is squareli.- co':ered b-y the orcler datecl 26 07 2O18 passed by this Court in W.P.No-26085 of 2018.

3. Sri R.Vinod ReCclv, leainecl Star-rding Counsel for Telangana State Southern Porver Distribution Compam Limited' appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Chatla liadhu' learned Stalding Counsel for Grater Hvrlerabad Munrcipal Corporalion' appearing for respondent No'4, do not dispute the aforesaid submrsston'

4. In view of the above, for the reasons alike in the said order' this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to release power supply to the premises of the petitioner subject to the compliance of the terms and conditions and on furnishing an undertaking to produce the occupancy certificate fro the concerned Municipal Corporation within a prescribed period, and if no such occupancy certifrcate is produced within such period' it is open to 2 the responder-rtri r ) ;rlie appropriate action in accordance .,vith Iarv Miscellaneous l)crir (rrs pending, if any, shall stancl disposel of There sha-ll be r o ,;t.1:r as to costs. Date:20.04.2O20 Note; Registry to tr::.rr,.r. r.opy of the order clated 2b. ; . ( IS in W.P No.26085 of 2{ t,:. B/o TJMR K.LAKSHMAN, J