✦ High Court of India · 17 Jun 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 17 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
17 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,050 words

Acts & Sections

Petition under Artlcle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that'in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of wRlT oF MANDAMUS directing the respondents 2 to 3 to provide electricity connection extension of LT Supply for 8Nos. 3-0 each 25KW, 2No- 3-0 each 45KW and 1No 3-0 10KW Non-Domestic loads on ex-1No.3-0 14KW (Sc' No.11055 08918) Temp Load, thus making a total load of 314KW Connection to the Commercial Building, the Plot Nos.2, 3/A, 3lB,20lA,20lB and 21, in Survey No.221 , totally admeasuring 1095 Sq. Yards, situated at Madinaguda (V), Serilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District, T.S., bounded by North National Highway No-9 - Hyderabad to Mumbai south. 33 Wide Road East. Plot No.4 and .19 west. Plot No-1 and 22. Without insisting upon occupancy certificate from the 4th respondent try hord ng that the refusar to provide erectricity con nection to the above referred prernises is illegal and arbitrary IANO:1OF2 025 Petition undor {ioction i51 cpc praying that in the circumsrances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may b e preased to direct the resporrd.ntr; 2 to 7 to provide erectricity connectio. ex ension of LT supply for 8Nos 3'0 r:ach 25KW,2No. 3-0 each 45KW & 1N.3-( 10KW Non- Domestic loads r;n ex-'rNo.3-0 14KW (sc. No.11055 08918) remr: Load, thus making a totar road c'f ir14KW connection to the commerciar Buirr;irrg, the prot Nos.2, 3/A, 3lB, i>_OiA 20lB and 2.1 , in Survey No.221 , totajly a,Jmear;uring 1095 Sq. Yards, situated zrt Madinaguda (V), Serilingampally (M r, Ranga Redcly District, T.S., bcurdr:J by North. National Highway No_9 __ HyrJerabad to Mumbai; South. 33' Wijr: Road; East. plot No.4 and 19; West. plot \r:.1 and 22. without insisting upo, occupancy certificate from the 4th res;:onrrent pending disposal of main vrri' pr.tition and may deem fit and proper in the crrc unstance of the case. Counsel for the petitiorrer: Smt. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH Counsel for the Resporrclent No.1: Gp FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respordent Nos. 2&3: SRI N. SREEDHAR REDDy, SC FOR TSSPDCL Counsel for the Resporrclent No.4: SRI G. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the lbllowing: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No. 16525 OF 2025 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself

2. This Writ Petition is flled, under Article 226 of t]r,e Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: "..to issue tttit order or diection more- particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS dtrectnv the respotldents 2 to 3 to prouide eLecticitA corLnection exterTsiorl of LT SuppLA /or BNos. 3 O each 25KW, 2No. 3-O each 45Kw & 1No 3-O LOKW Non Dorrlestic loacls on ex 1No.3O 14KW (Sc. No.11O55 08918) Temp lhad, thus makutg a totaL load of 314KW Connection to the ConLrnerctdl Buitding, the Plot Nos.2, 3/A, 3/8, 2O/A,20/B and 21, in Surueg No.221, totallg admeosuing 1095 Sq. Yards, situated at Madinaguda (V), Serittagampallg (M), Ratrya Reddu Dtstict, 1'.5., bounded bg Notth: Natiandl HrghuaA No 9 Hllderabad Lo Mumbdi; South: 33' wide Road; East: PIot No.4 and 19; west: Plot No.l and 22. without insi.sting upon oc.vpancA certtficate from the 4Lh respondent bA holding that the ref)-so,l to prouide electicitA connectton to the aboue refened premi-ses b illegal and arbitrary and pass.-."

3. Heard Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, Iearned counsel for the petitioner; Iearned Government Pleader for Energy for respondent No.1; Sri N.Sreedhar Rcddy, learned Standing Counsel for Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, for t I respondent Nos.2 and 3; and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, for respondent No.4. 4, Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of this 2 ! I (ri-lj 202:) t) Court in \,\..F'No.6O30 of 2O2O, dated 20.O4.2O.20, rnd requested this Cou -t to pass similar order in the present Writ F'e it ion also. The sam: is n ot seriously disputed by the lea rnerl G l'ernment Pleader as ,l erl I as learned Standing Counsel for t re r,:s:c ndenls.

5. In rir u' rt the above submissions and for Llr( r( asio'1ri alike in the order o' 11 i; Court in W.P.No.6O3O of 2O2O, Tatcd 2t).)4.2O2O, this Wril, Pe tjtlon is disposed of directing the respond:nts to release the power r;r: yr;rlv to the premises of the petitione r su b- e :t to the complian:e ,:)t the terms and conditions and on lurr is,hing an undertakinr3 [.' produce the occupancy cerr.ificzrtc fl om the concerne,l Ilr.r:r icipal Corporation within a prescribcd pcricd, and if no such ocouf )ancy certificate is produced within sucl-r p:r iod, it is open to tht rt spondents to take appropriate action ir-r a tcordance with law. Misce'lla tcous petitions pending, if any, sJ-rall starr<l closed. There sha 11 bc no order as to costs. SD EE:P /- I.I.RAJAGOPAL UT'Y REGISTRAR ,/TRUE COPY// , SEC:TION OFFICER To, l:p;!lii*:*1:'[,ffiil#;.d#;;:j'ffi ';ffi , !f:z'"r ii[i"?:i::"4',::ic"'ei'fr:,?[,T 4. The tlomnllssloner' sfu :di$:i{f?p'enl-t"-g'.1-ig"&,ff l::ii?t8fi"'i,re,ansanaat ffi,:,3,i ' JJ$?11?'x'" - ls'#ildii'tffiE,',im[FR?"ds3":3313'J'33',''ir""t'tr 9. Two C[) C;oP es -V- ,l I CC TODAY fti;:z; o O , t \''ii ?l$ O HIGH COUFIT DATED:1710612025 ORDER WP.No.165215 of 2025 DISPOSING OF] THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \')- JL w\{

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments