1. Parsa Rambabu v. State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of respondent No.3 in high handedly interfering in civil disputes without any basis and interfering with the possession and enjoyment of agricultural property of the petitioners situated in Sy. No. 193, 198, 199 and 204 of Ganeshunipadu revenue village of Penuballi mandal, Khammam and continuously summoning the petitioners to the police station, making to sit for hours and pressurizing to enter settlement with unofficial respondents and not letting the petitioners harvest the crop at the instance of unofficial respondents as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of articles 14,21 ,3OO-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and third parties -----v lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci'cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and third parties and to let the petitioners harvest their crop during the pendency of main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. TARUN RAM AITHAM Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER .:^"::r.:r,' THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.16571 OF 2025 ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3, and with the consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the stage of admission'

2. Shorn of unnecessary deLalls, the case of the petitioner in brief, is that the 3'd respondcnt high handedly is interfering in civil disputes without anv basis and interfering with the petitioners' possession and enjoyment over the agricultural property situated in Sy. Nos.193, 198, 199 and 2O4 of Ganeshunipadu revenue village of Penuballi Mandal, Khammam District, by calling the petitioner to police station and making him to sit for hours and pressurizrng to enLer into settlement with the unofficial respondents and not allowing the petitioners to harvest the crop at the instance of unofficial. respondents which action of the respondents it is contended as highiy illegal' arbitrary, unjust and in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 1,4, 2l and 300-A of the Constitution of India. 2

3. Per contra, learned Government plead er appearlng on behalf of respondents white denying the writ aver-ments wourd submit that the 1sr petitioner,s sister p. Triveni l,iad approached the respondent authorities and lodged a complaint on 06.06.2025 and for rh,3 purpose of causing r:nquiry into the aforesaid complaint lodged by p. Triveni, the authorities have issued initial notice dateci Og.06.2O2S under Set.tion 94 of BNSS calling upon the petitioner to furnish infor.matron to the authorities on 10.06.2025 at 10:00 a.m. 4. Learned Government pleader further subrnits that pursuanL to the aforesaid noLice as the petrhoner did not furnish any information, the authorities have ssued another notice under Sectior-r 94 of BNSS on 1O.O6.2O2,j directing the petitioncr to furnish clocurnsnls regarding the I:r ncl disputc for the authorities to take further action on the comp.ztint lodged by the 1st petitioner,s sister. .) Learned Government pleader further subm i ts thzrt if only the petitioner furnishes the documents relating to the land being claimed by him, the authorities could have e::amined as tcr whether the claim of the complainant of tlLe petitioner . - . -;-. -:s ./ - ,,J]a:*r :/ -) restraining her from the property is valid or not for . the authorities to take further action.

6. Learned Government Pleader further submits that even now if the petitioner furnishes the information pursuant to notice issued under Section 94 of BNSS on 10'06 2025, ti:.e authorities would look into the same before taking further action on the complaint lodged by Ms. P. Triveni, the 1st petitioner's sister. 7 - On the aforesaid submission being made by the learned Government Pleader, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would approach the 3'd respondent authority on 20.06.2025 and furnish all the relevant information relating to the subject land. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would further submit 8. that the respondent authorities may be directed to issue necessary acknowledgment for the documents as may be furnished by the Petitioner. g. Learned Government Pleader assures this Court that if \ the petitioner approaches the 3'd respondent and furnishes the information/documents relating lo the subject land in respect of which the petitioner's sister had lodged a complaint on 4 a.

06.06.2025, the authorities woulcl acknor.r,ieclgment, but would consider the said documents in connection with the complaint lodged by the 1s peltitioner before taking further action in the matter. n(rt only issue

10. In vjew of the above, this Court is of tltc vreu. that the petitioner should be directed to appear before the authorities on the date mentioned hereinabove and furnish ,he rnformation. Upon the petitioner furnishing the information and crocuments, the respondents shall considcr as to whether the complaint lodged blr the petitioner discloses commission o1.any cognizable offencc lor it to take further action. In th I event ol_ the complaint discloses commission of cognizabl: offence, the authorities are further directcd [o take acr otr strrcL]y in accordance rvith law. 1 1. Subject ro the above direction, the W_it petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendir-rg in the Writ Petition, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPYII d/.K.BHAVANI SWAMY q$rsTANT REGTSTRAR S A,\ i' SECTION OFFICER (Home Department), secretariat Buirdinss, ' I!: "r}ffi'BtsecretarY 2. The Commissioner of p. 5.ilr;5,"JI*l ji"#;'?iB'"[3f t;M:E:XII'J68?l;[[],111[€,[nuoa,,manda,, ,ef ?-.1333J?".:3il6R'J"W,t!.^t{lf i",.","#"r[3,Elilu,u,n,.,u, It^ - Hyderabad tOUTt O*O.U. ,*o CDCoiies ' Mtxss**et*AXrffiG;;'"iii*&;t'=ffi.M D1/ I HIGH COURT DATED:1 810612025 ORDER WP.No.16571 ot 2025 ,-.a=.::''::- '.,. rr+E'-ll r -_ 3" .),+ M z o .\ l'\'t /;- 1,1 zg fittti i,-. \a,\\ r, \.: 1,; . - \=_.,. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I