The High Court · 2025

Public Prosecutor High Court of Judicature of Telangana, At Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT 2. Lingala Eleiah, S/o. Lingala Ramulu, aged about 55 years, Occ Business, R/o H. No. 2-'142, Hydershakote, Gandipet Mandal, R.R. District. ...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the S.C.No. 57 of 2018 on the file of the Special Judge for t t SC/ST's (POA) Act cum Addl. Sessions Judge at L.B. Nagar, R R. District as the same is abuse of process of law. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS Act, 2023 praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the joint memo of compromise and to permit the to compromise petitioners and the 2nd respondent to compromise in the interest of justice- l.A. NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 oI Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim stay granted on 23-08-2019 in lA No. 112019 in Crl P.No 453312019 l.A. NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in S.C.No. 57 ot 2018 on the file of the Special Judge for SC/STs (POA) Act cum Addl Sessions Judge at L.B. Nagar, R.R District pending disposal of the above CriminaI Petition. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Between: Lingala Eleiah, S/o. Lingala Ramulu, aged about 55 years, Occ Business, R/o. H. No.2-142, Hydershakote, Gandipet Mandal, R.R. District. ...PETITIONER/2Nd RESPONDENT AND 1 The State of Telangana, Station House Officer, Rajendra Nagar, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Judicature of Telangana, At Hyijerabad. ...RESPONDENT 3St''1? "'ii 'il?Xlh ']A':'ffo:11.ff"1]vfi333' - -^.r ^h.r, rr 67 vears, Occ Business' R/o H *r'=r*' ' 8",[:;:il:*X"t' *"i: District. * ."t':'r,rur.*t5ffi',:,rf ,:33:3'"ffi '?,$il,"jtlou""'fi ' :nt*#J sn ffi : *r.{][rrr't l*:xi*i1x?3:1'I JB?lii "?:: u,*;J"fl*n[119/,ff ##[l,E5full*tqql*""lJ':f a'':si''i'i"'li 'i!fi Bx;,1[,"ft ff 1-Ri{ir#ni}mff i9n#it3::t'"?'-"""ff :i?fi ' li:r,nt,,5fi€ Vft:?'3,%:a:i,3ifl':'":? Iafl'bff[f'siness' 8 Kona Ashok Goud :,-;-",,",*A;l i",,"r1rX1"#:ff i'ro,,fi.?'"'n"ss' R/o H No H'No 2-22' Hydersha R/o "'RESpoNDENT/AccusED No' 1 to 7 n 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances Petition under Sectio of Grounds of Criminal Petition' the High Court may stated in the tVlemorandum compound the offences and quash the same against be pleased to Permission to to 7 in S.C.No 57l2O1B on the file of SC/ST'S (POA) petitioners/ Accused Nos.1 Addl Sessions Judge Court at L.B.Nagar, R R District for the Act -Cum- offences under Sec. 323, rtw 34 IPC and 3 (1) (s) of SC/ST (POA) Amendment Act, 2015 and pass all necessary orders' This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri M. srinivasa swarup, Advocate for the Petitioner, Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. .l and of sri K. sai sri Harsha, Advocate for the Respondent No. Z. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER T I I I !--,---- ?HE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURENDER I.A.Nos.1an d2of 202s ln and cRIMINAL PETITIO N No.4933 of 20L9 COMMON oRDER: The present Criminal petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings pending against the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 7 in S.C.No.S7 of 2018 on the file of the Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SCs and STs (poA) Act, 19g9-cum_Additional Sessions Judge, at L.B.Nagar, Rangareddy District, for the offences under Section 323 read with Section 34 of IpC and Section 3(1)(s) of SCs and STs (poA) , , Amendment Act, 1]015

2. I.A.Nos. 1 and 2 of 2025 is filed by the petitioner I de facto complainant seeking to compound the offences punishable under Section 323 read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 3(1)(s) of SCs and STs (PoA) Amendment Act, 2Ot5 with which the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 7 were charged, and to record the compromise arrived between the parties at the intervention of the elders.

3. Both the parties were present in-person before the Court ald they were identihed by their respective counsel. A11 the parties in principle have agreed to compromise the matter'

4. In view of the same' I'A'Nos'l and 2 of 2O25 are allowed and the Criminal Petition is allowed' and the proceedings pending against 2 petitioners/accused Nos. 1 to 7 in S.C.No.57 of 2Ola on the file of the Special Judge for Trial of Cases under SCs and STs (poA) Act, 19g9- cum-Additional Sessions Judge, at L.B.Nagar, Rangareddy District, are quashed. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K AMMAJI \ To, //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR NV*- \ SECTION OFFICER

1. The Special Judge for SC/ST's (POA) Act cum Addl. Sessions Judge at L.B. Nagar, R.R. District

2. The Vlll Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad at Rajendranagar 3. The Station House Officer, Rajendranagar Police Station, Cyberabad 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. One CC to Sri M. Srinivasa Swarup, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri K. Sai Sri Harsha, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CD Copies (Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) VII/PSI, I F HIGH COURT DATED: 1210212025 \ t\r- SfAf € \! z o .L ..1 2 3 tlnl 2[25 OFs r.....Tct\t: ) \ COMMON ORDER l.A. NO: 1 AND 2 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.4933 of 2019 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION \ \c Ll H r G H co u Rr o r r r rr.of'ro*'l' ISI T,?[3+[f,u #ruLo.]o * n o * A Ar H y D E RA B A D CRL.P.NO. 4933 0F 2019 Against (s. c. No. 5T of 21lSon the fire of the court of speciar Judge for sc/sTs (poA) Act cum Addr. Sessions Judge at l_.8. Nagar,R.R. District). Between:

1. P. Krishna Reddy, !/o. t-,ate Penta Reddy, aged about 42 years, Occ: Sarpanch, R/o. H. No. 1-72, Hydershakote Village, Gandipet Mandal, RR District.

2. Chintala. Yettaiah, S/o. Jangaiah, aged about 62 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No.2- 1, Hydershakote Village, Gandipet Mandal, RR District

3. Sadireddy. Sai Reddy, S/o.Laxma Reddy, aged about 27 years, Occ: private employee, R/o. Hydershakote Village, Gandipet Mandal, RR District.

4. P. Indra Reddy, S/o.Late Penta Reddy, aged about 28 yr_,ars, Occ: Sarpanch, R/0. H. No. 1-72, Hydershakote Village, Gandipet Mandal, RR District. Petitioner No. 1 Qryry Petitioner No. + ( PetitionerNo.2 / AbaLf Petitioner No. 5 Petitioner No. 3 /1 Ct SID'- Petitioner No, 6 ,9/ Petitioner No. 7 \\t€."=:- Vrr*6vq, baafu Respondent No. 2

5. Shapuram. Venkat Reddy, S/o.Late Penta Reddy, aged about 29 years, Occ: Agricultural, Ri/o. H. No. 1-63, Hydershakote Village, Gandipet Mandal, RR District.

6. Kasha. Balraj, S/o.Mallaiah, aged about 52years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 2-1, Hydershakote Village, Gandipet Mandal, RR District,

7. Kona. Ashok Goud, S/o. Dasharath, aged about 54 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 2-22, Hydershakote Village, Gandipet Mandal, RR District. And

1. The State ofTelangana Station House Officer, Rajendra Nagar, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Judicature of Telangana, At Hyderabad.

2. Lingala Eleiah, \ ...Petitioner/Accused No. 1 to 7 Respondent S/o. Lingala Ramulu, aged about 55 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No.2-142, Hydershakote, Ga ndipet Mandal, R.R. District. ...Respondent/Defacto Complainant Petitioner No. 1 (0"r*- Petitiorrer No. 4 Petitioner No.z C Db; o74', Petitioner No. 5 .- lt ,,' > iltY Pdtitioner No. 7 k*y:- Petitioner No. 3 @,& Petitioner No K I INT COMPIT oMISE MEMO FILIID BY DEF'ACTO C 1'HTI PETI]'IONERS / AC(]LTSED ANI) LAINANT/RE SPONDI'NT NO.2 l. It is submitted that the above quash petition is filed by the Petitioners / Accused to quash the proceedings in SCNo. 57 of 2018 on the file of the I Special Judge for SC/ST's (POA) Act cum Addl. Sessions Juttge at L.B. Nagar, R.R. District. Initially a case is registered under Sec. 323,rlw 34IpC and 3 (1) (s) of SC/ST (POA) Amendment Act, 2015 and rire sarne is registered in Crime No 1908/2017. Thereafter a charge sheet has been filed and the same is numbered as S.C.No 57/2018 on the file of SC/ST'S @OA) Act {um- Addl.Sessions Judge Cour-t at L.B.Nagar, I{.R.District

2. It is submitted that both the accused and the Defacto complainant belongs to same village and due to the political ri''ralry and under false inlbmration and impression the said case has been registered against the Petitioners / Accused by the Dee-facto Complainant. Due to the intervention of elders of the village and the past relations between the accused and defacto complainant both the parties have compromised. In view of the said compromise, the Defaoto Complainant has decided to withdraw the case filed against the Petitioners / Accused herein. The Defacto complainant has no objection to quash the same basing upon the present compromise memo filed by both the parties herein. Petitioner No. 1 Petitioner No. + (' Petitioner No.2 C)&)alepetitionerNo.s g Q ,/ Petitioner No. 3 US- Petitioner No. 6 YqrBb** Petitioner N o.71\W:- , .1 l/8/c,4/ ^4' Respondent No.2

3. Therefore, the joint memo of compromise is being filed seeking ,"rril Hontle Court, to compound the offence and to record the compromise quash the proceeding S.C.No 5712018 on the file of SC/ST'S (pOA) A Cum- Addl.Sessions Judge Courl at L.B.Nagar, R.R.District.

4. It is therefore prayed that the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to rcceive the joint memo of compromise and to permit the petitioners and the 2nd reispondent to compound the offence in the interests ofjustice and equity. Petitioner No. 4 (yZ_ Petitioner No. 1 O){rlf Petitioner No.2 C ) *^l4\petitioner No. 5 5r Petitioner No. 3 S$- Petitiorrer No. 6 Petitioner No. 7 Y.W'z=- Nl,,q-:- --.'-'1 Counsel for the petitioner n6> )dv,ta. & Cou nsel for the R (K-<-r'Sr.,' fr*4) espondent No.2 L33fu,- Respondent'N0.2