Writ Petition No. 5591 of 2011 · Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Partly allowed
Hence, the Writ Petition is partly allowed directing that the
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ss. 53, 53(1)(b)
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Hence, the Writ Petition is partly allowed directing that the suspension of the certificate of registration of the vehicle bearing No. AP 02/TA.0573 shall be restricted to 30 days from 25-02-2011 to 24-03-2011. The petitioner shall be entitled to ply the vehicle after 24-03-2011…
Judgment
The petitioner is the owner of a Heavy Goods Vehicle bearing No.AP 02/TA.0573. The permit of the vehicle was suspended from 25-12-2010 to 23-01-2011 on the ground that the vehicle was overloaded. However, the vehicle was found tobe plying on 13-01- 2011 even while the permit was under suspension. Therefore, notice under Section 53 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘MV Act’) was issued to the petitioner, proposing to cancel the certificate of registration of the vehicle. The petitioner submitted his explanation, and not satisfied with that, the Deputy Commissioner & Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Anantapur, the 2nd respondent herein, suspended the registration of the vehicle for a period of 60 days from 25-02-2011 to 25-04-2011 under Section 53 (1) (b) of the MV Act. The
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Transport.
It is no doubt true that the registration of a vehicle cannot be suspended for the violation of conditions of permit. This case, however, presents a typical situation. The permit of the vehicle was suspended for a period of one month on the ground that the vehicle was plying with over load. The petitioner has chosen to ply the vehicle even while the suspension of the permit was in vogue. Therefore, it cannot be said to be an action for plying vehicle overloaded simplicitor. The petitioner has resorted to a serious violation. Taking the totality of the circumstances into account, this Court is of the view that the ends of justice would be met if the suspension of the certificate of registration is restricted to 30 days by imposing penalty of Rs.3,000/- .
Operative part
Hence, the Writ Petition is partly allowed directing that the suspension of the certificate of registration of the vehicle bearing No. AP 02/TA.0573 shall be restricted to 30 days from 25-02-2011 to 24-03-2011. The petitioner shall be entitled to ply the vehicle after 24-03-2011 and on payment of Rs.3,000/- as penalty. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J March 14, 2011. KTL
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the Writ Petition is partly allowed directing that the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — ss. 53, 53(1)(b).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.