Mr. Konam Yadagiri v. 'l . The State of Telangana

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in non-considering representations of the petitioner dated 2410412023 as well as online appilcation vide No.2400015040 and non-initiating to cancel the illegal pattadar passbooks of the respondent No.5 who is father of respondent No.6 and grandfather of respondent No.7 to I to an extent of Ac.O.29 guntas in Sy.No.106, - Ac.O.22 guntas in Sy.No.'107, Ac.0.10 guntas in Sy.No.109, total Ac.1.21 guntas, which is situated at Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, which are issued without having any right and possession on the Bhakta Markandeya Swamy Temple lands of Kakkireni Village, is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles, 14, 15,21 and 300 of Constitution of lndia and also violative of natural Justice and consequently to direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider my representations of the petitioner dated 24-04-2023 as well as online application vide No.2400015040 and to cancel the illegal pattadar passbooks of the respondent No.5 who is father of respondent No.6 and grandfather of respondent No.7 to 9 to an extent of Ac.0.29 guntas in Sy.No.106, Ac.O.22 guntas in Sy.No.107, Ac.0.10 guntas in Sy.No.109, total Ac.1.21 guntas, which is situated at Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri District, which are issued without having any right and possession on the Bhakta Ivlarkandeya Swamy Temple lands of Kakkireni Village and do the needful justice to the Petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider my represenlations of the petitioner dated 2410412023 as well as online application vide No.2400015040 and to cancel the illegal pattadar passbooks of the respondent No.5 who is father of respondent No.6 and grandfather of respondeni No.7 to I to an extent of Ac.0.29 guntas in Sy.No.106. Ac.O.22 guntas in Sy.No.107, Ac.0.10 guntas in Sy.No.109, total Ac.'1 .21 guntas, which is situated at Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet [\/andal, Yadad ri-B h uvanag iri District, whlch are issued without having any right and possession on the Bhakta Markandeya Swamy Temple lands of Kakkireni Village and do the needful justice to the Petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under section 1sl cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pteased to direct respondent No.4 to not to entertain any registration on the land of Bhakta Markandeya Swamy Temple to an extent of Ac.0.29 guntas in Sy.No.106, 4c.0.22 guntas in Sy.No.107, Ac.0.10 guntas in Sy.No.109, total Ac.1.21 guntas, which is situated at Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet Mandal. Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri District and do the needful justice to the Petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO:3 OF 2024 Between:

1. Gurram Chinna Narsaiah, S/o.Veeraiah, Age. 70 years, Occ. Agriculture. 2. Gurram [VIallaiah, S/o.Chinna Narsaiah, Age. 48 years, Occ. Agriculture. 3. Gurram [\/ahender, S/o.Chinna Narsaiah, Age. 44 years, Occ. Agriculture. 4. Gurram Machagiri, S/o. Chinna Narsaiah, Age. 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, All are Rli o. Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District. ...VACATE PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS No.6 TO 9 AND

1. firlr. Konam Yadagiri, S/o. Venkataiah, Age.55 years, Occ.President of Sri Bhaktha Markondaiah Seva Samithi, R/o. Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District. ...RESPON DENT/PETITIONER

2. The State of Telangana, Rep, by its Principal Secretary. Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3. The District Collector, Bhuvanagiri, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Choutuppal Division, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri

5. The Tahsildar, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District. 6. Gurram Veeraiah, S/o,lMaraiah, (died his Legal heirs are Respondents No.6 to District. 9) ...RESP.NDENTS/RESP.NDENTS Petltion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Vacate the lnterim Order passed on 18.03.2024 in l.A. No. O2 of 2024 in WP No. 6935 of 2024. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: SRI L.RAVINDER, Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 TO 9: SRI SEETHA RAM REDDY AGP FOR REVENUE KANCHARLA W.P.NO: 4590 OF 2024 Betwee n: Gurram China Narsaiah, S/o Late Veeraiah, Age. 72 Years, Occ. Agrl, Fl/o KakkireniVillage, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir District. AND ...PETITIONER Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, TS.

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, 2 Tahshildar, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir District. 3. It4andal Surveyor, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir District. 4. Additional Revenue lnspector, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir District. 5. Papani Narsimha, S/o Kumara Swamy, Age. 50 Years, Occ. Agrl, 6. Karnati Bhaskar, S/o Veeraiah, Age. 55 Years, Occ. Agrl, Both 5th and 6th Respondents are Rl/o Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir District ...RES'.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 3rd to 5th Respondents for dispossessing the Petitioner for an extent of Ac 0.29 Gts in Sy No. 106, for an extent of Ac O.22 Gts in Sy No.107 and for an extent of Ac 0.10 Gts in Sy No. 109 total for an extent o'f Ac 1.21 Gts situated at Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet, Yadadri Bhongir District and consequently direct, the 2nd Respondent lo remove the Notice Board in the Petitioner's property. lA NO: 'l OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased lt is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to the 3rd to 5th Respondents not to interfere the Petitioner's property for an extent of Ac 0.29 Gts in Sy.No.106, for an extent of Ac O.22 Gts in Sy No.107 and for an extent of Ac 0.'10 Gts in Sy No. 109 total for an extent of Ac 1.21 Gts situated at Kakkireni Village, Rarnannapet, Yadadri Bhongir District pending disposal of the main Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SEETHARAM REDDY KANCHARLA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S & 6: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR W.P.NO: 16867 OF 2024 Betwee n: Gurram China Narsaiah, Sio Late Veeraiah, Age. 72 Years, Occ.Agd, Fl/o Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir District. AND ...PETITIONER 1- The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, TS. 2. District Collector, Yadadri Bhongir District. 3. Tahshildar, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir District. 4. Sri Bhaktha l\/arkandeya Committee, Kakkireni Village Rep by its President Kunam Yadagiri, S/o Venkaiah,Age. 55Years, Occ. Agrl, Rio Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir District. 5. Kunam Yadagiri, Sio Venkaiah, Age. 55Years, Occ. Agrl, 6. Papani Narsimha, S/o Kumara Swamy, Age. 50 Years, Occ. Agrl, 7. Miryala Janaiah, S/o IVlarkandeyudu Age. 45 Years, Occ. Agrl, B. Karnati Bhaskar, S/o Veeraiah, Age, 55 Years. Occ, Agrl, (All 5th to 8th Respondents are Rl/o Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhongir District ) ...RES'.NDENT' Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lt4andamus to declare the action of the 2nd Respondenl passing an order in F2146512024, Dt. 16.05.2024 and consequently set aside the order passed by the 2nd Respondent in F2146512024, Dt. 16.05.2024 and further . direct the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to issue the E Pattedar Pass Book vide T 301301 11036 to the Petitioner for an extent of Ac 0.29 Gts in Sy No. 106, for an extent of Ac 0.22 Gts in Sy No.107 and for an extent of Ac 0.10 Gts in Sy No. 109 total for an extent of Ac 1.21 Gts situated at Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet, Yadadri Bhongir District. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the Order of the 2nd Respondents in F2146512024, Dl. 16.05.2024 pending disposal of the main Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SEETHARAM REDDY KANCHARLA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 3: SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 TO 8: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER 7 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT ITYDERABAI) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION Nos.6935 4590 and 76467 of2024 DATE OF ORDER: OA.L2.2O25 WRIT PETITION No.693S of 2024 BETWEEN: Konam Yadagiri AND The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and B others. WRIT PETITION No.459O of 2024 BETWEEN Grram China Narsaialr AND The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and 5 others. WRIT PETITION No.16867 of 2024 BETWEEN: Grram China Narsaiah AND The State of Telalgana ... Petitioner ... Respondents . . . Petitioner ... Respondents ... Petitioner Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and 7 others. 2 \ ... Respondents :COMMON ORDER: Writ petition No.6935 of 2024 is filed for the following prayer ".,.pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in non-considering representations of the petitioner dated, 24/04/2O23 as well as online applicalion vide No.240OO15O4O and non-initiating to r:ancel the ilk:gal pattadar passbooks of the respondent No.5 who is farther of respondent No.6 and grandfather of respondent No.7 to 9 to an extent of Ac.O.29 guntas in Sy. No. 1O6, Ac.O.22 guntas in Sy.No.l07. Ac.O-1O guntas in Sy.No.1O9, total Ac. 1.21 guntas rvhich is situated at Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District which are issued without having any right and possession on the Bhakta Markandeya Swamy Temple lands of Kakkireni Village is illegal, arbitra5r and violative of Articles 14, 15, 2l and 300 of Constitution of India and a.lso violative of natural justice and consequently to direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider my representations of the petitioner dated 21.04.2023 as well as online application vide No.24OOO15O4O and to cancel the illegal pattadar passbooks of the respondent No.S who ls father of respondent No.6 and grandfather of respondent NoS.7 to 9 to an extent of Ac.O.29 guntas in Sy.No. f 06, Ac.O.22 guntas in Sy.No.107, Ac.O. 10 guntas in Sy.No.lO9, total Ac. 1.21 guntas which is situated at Kakkireni Village Ramannapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District which are issued without having any right and possession on the Bhakta Markandeya Swamy Temple lands of Kakkireni Village and do the needful justice to the Petitioner. .." Writ petition No.4590 of 2024 is filed for the following prayer "...to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action ol the 3'a to 5th Respondents for dispossessing the Petitioner for an extent of Ac.0.29 gts in Sy.No.1O6 for an extent of Ac.O.22 gts in Sy.No.1O7 and for an extent of Ac.O. lO gts in 3 Sy.No.109, total for an extent of Ac.1.21 gts situated at Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet Mandai, Yadadri Bhongir District a-rrd consequenfly direct the 2"d Respondent to remove the Notice Board in the Petitioners property..." Writ petition No.459O o{ 2024 is filed for the following prayer: "to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more parlicularly one in the nalure of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 2"d Respondent passing an order in F2/46512024 Dt. 16.05.2024 and consequently set-aside the order passed by the 2nd Respondent in F2/465/2O24 Dt. 16.05.2024 and further direct the 2na and 3.d Respondents to issue the E-Pattedar Pass Book uide T 30130111036 to the Petitioner for an extent of Ac.O.29 gts in Sy.No. 106 for an extent of Ac.O.22 gts in Sy.No. 107 and for an extent of Ac.O.1O gts in Sy.No.1O9, total for an extent of Ac. 1.21 gts, situated at Kakkireni Village Ramannapet Yadadri Bhongir District..."

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for official respondents and learned counsel for unofficial respondents. Perused the records.

3. Since the parties to these wdt petitions are one and the same, these writ petitions are heard together and disposed of by way of this common order.

4. [,e arned counsel for the petitioner would submit that admittedly as against the impugned proceedings in endorsement No.B / 529 / 2023, dated 22.08.2023, the petitioner 1n \ 4 W.P.No.6935 ol 2024 had filed a sluit uide O.S.No.55 of 2025 on the Iile of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Ramannapet, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District. He would submit that though the petitioner had initiated the civil proceedings, application filed by the petitioner, vide application No.2400015040 has not been decided by the official respondents and it is pending for consideration. He would submit that the petitioner ought to have been communicated the action taken by the official respondents ln respect of thc online application filed by the petitioner for change of name in the revenue records. He would further submit that taking advantage of illegal entry in Dharani portal, unofficial respondents are trying to occupy the land of Bhakta Markandeya Swamy Temple. But the official responclents did not initiate any action to delete the illegal entries of the unofhcial respondents. Hence, he would seek to pass appropriate orders.

5. Learned counsel for unofficial respondents would submit that admittedly the petitioner in W.P.No.6935 of 2024 had initiated civil proceedings in O.S.No.55 of 2025 and one of the unofficial respondents has also filed the suit in O.S. No. IIZ of 2025 on the lile of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Ramannapet, ) wherein the petitioner is the defendant and the said proceedings are still pending. When the matters are pending before the civil Court, the revenue authorities cannot decide the civil issues in the Revenue proceedings and the judgment of the civil Court would be binding upon the revenue authorities. Hence, he would seek to dismiss these writ petitions.

6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that the parties to these writ petitions have already filed counter suits before the civil Court. At this stage, the official I respondents cannot interfere with the proceedings. He would / I submit that as and when the civil disputes attained frnality, the ofhcial respondents will comply with the orders passed by the learned civil Court. Hence, he would seek to dismiss these writ petitions.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and learned counsel for unofficial respondents, this Court is of the opinion that since the parties to these writ petitions have already instituted separate suits uicle O.S.Nos.55 of 2025 and 112 of 2025, and the matters are pending before the learned Junior Civil Judge, Ramannapet, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, this Court does not 6 see any reason to keep the writ petitions pending. Therefore, this Court, without making any observations on the merits or demerits of the cases, deems it appropriate to dismiss these writ petitions.

8. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if ary, shall stand closed. ,TRUE COPYII SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL PUry REGIS CTION OFFICER I I BHASKAR, Advocate IOp VENUE, High Court foithe I S of Telangana, at RAIV REDDy KANCHARLA, Advocate [OPUC] To 1 2 3 4 PSK. BS . One CC to SRt RApOLU . TWO CCS tO GP FOR RE Hyderabad. IOUTI . One CC to SRt SEETHA . Two CD Copies Y HIGH COURT DATED:0811212025 COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.6935, 4590 AND 16867 ot 202 t hESI ).( o -f * 0 2 f i.8 l,i,)'. * TC"1 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS @ b €