✦ High Court of India · 02 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 02 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
02 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,455 words

Acts & Sections

K Vinay Kumar, S/o. K. Satyanarayana Rao, Aged about 47 years, Occ Agriculture and Business, R/o H No.30/4, Vignanpuri Colony, Vidya Nagar, Hyderabad ( Vinod Kumar, S/o. K. Satyanarayana, Aged about 45 years, Occ Business, R/o H.No 3418, Vignanpuri Colony, Vidya Nagar, Hyderabad. Juk-am Reddy, S/o. A. Venkat Reddy, aged 46 yeari, Occ Agriculture, J, Srimannarayana, S/o J. Venkat Narayana, aged about 42 years, Rlo. Vedangipalem Village, Poduru Mandal, West Godavari Dist. Venkateshwara Rao, S/o. Rajaiah, aged about 36 years, R/o. Jaggaiahpet Village, Krishna District. M. Ramamohan, S/o. M. Somasekhar, aged about 39 years, Rio_ 192 TRT, Sithaphal Mandi, Secunderabad. Darga Ramulu, Sio. Late Darga Veeraiah, aged about 52 years, Darga Gopal, S/o. Late Darga Veeraiah, aged abotit 48 yeiars, Darga Shankaraiah, S/o. Late Darga Narayana, aged about 50 years Darga Narasimha, S/o. Late Darga Narayana, aged about 49 ydars Darga Ralamani, Wo Late Darga Rajaiah, aged about 62 yedrs, Raju Goud, S/o. Late Darga Rajaiah, aged about 40 year6, Darga Lingamaiah, S/o. Darga Kistaiah, aged about 46 years, Darga Ramulu, S/o. Darga Kistaiah, aged about 4'l years, 2 ., 4 6

7. o o 10 11 12 13 14 Sl.7 to 14 are residents of Kismathpur Village, Rajendernagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Sl.No.3 to 14 are represented by their GPA Holder Sri K. Vinod Kumar S/o. K Satyanarayan Rao, aged about 45years R/o. Vidyanagar, Hyderabad. '15.A 16.A 't7 A 1B,A Jukam Reddy, S/o A Malla Reddy, aged about 68 years Narayana Reddy, S/o A. Malla Reddy, aged about 54 years Krishna Reddy, S/o. A. Malla Reddy, age<J about 49 years Bal Ram Reddy, S/o. A lr/lalla Reddy, aged about 47 years, Sl.No.15 to 18 are resident of Kismathpur Village, Raj endernagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy district. Sl.No 15 to 1B are represented by their GPA Holder Sri K. Vinay Kumar S/o. K. Satyanarayan Rao, aged about 47years, R/o. Vidyanagar, Hyderabad.

19.A Yadi Reddy, S/o. Late A. Pedda Venkat Reddy, aged about 42 years Occ Agriculture 20 A. Lakshma Reddy, S/o. Late A. Malta Reddy, aged about 48 years, 3l f N:lgyql R1ddy. S/o Late A Mafia Reddy ased about 44 years t2.4. Damodt ar Reddy. S/o Late A Malla Reddy,;qed aoout 3g years, 23 A Ashok Feddy, s/b LateA rvlailJ n"aov. Asj"Jiboul jry;;r's;- -' 24 A..Gopat F:eddy S/o Late A Chinna,6nrri-n"oOy. ngdo;bbut 38 years, Sl.No.15 tc 24'arc resident of Kisamathpu,. Viilag"'flai"enOranigai i/;;;rt, Ranga Reddy District 25 T Lakshminarayana, S/o T. Sathaiah, aged about 50 years,occ Agricurture and Busine ss sl No 19 to 25 are represented by their GpA Horder S i K Vinod Kumar s/o Saryanarayan Rao, aged about 45years R/o. Vidyanaqar, Hyderabad. ^. 26. Nobel school rrust. represented by its Trustee Suneer lr4arvenkar s/o. Dinkar Malvenkar. Aoed aboLit 65 years,'R/o. xiimatnpur nrie"oranrgli"Mandar, Ranga Red,ly-District AND ...PETIT|ONERS '1 The State ol rerangana., Bup- pv its secretary, rVrunicipalAdministration and - Department Secrelariat, SaifaUiO, HvderabaO 2 9l:itgl lyderabad,Munrcrpat CorporStion. nep Oy its Commissioner, Lower ^ ranK^Bund. .tyderabad. S/o. Late A Malta Reddv,'aqed about ag veari J. tne L;ommis,sioner of police, Lakdikapool. Hvderaba"d 4 The Hyderatrad lVretro Deveropment Authority, Brock-A, Drstrict commerciar - - - Complex, Te rnaka, Hyderabab, rep. by Direcior, Urban'Foresi (R4 isimple;rded as per Court Order dt. 05/0g/2015 in WP MP No l 1B4B12O15) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances sta ed in the affidavit fired therewith, the rligh court may be pleased to issue a appropriate writ, order or Directions morelparticurarry one rn the nature of writ of [Vrandamus by decraring the action of the,Respondents in not acting upon thrr compraint fired by the petitioner as who[y ilegar, arbitrary and unconstitutiona r and consequenfly direct the rst and the 2nd respondent not to plant trees or interfere with the possession of the petitioners rand situated in Kismathpur Village, Rajender Nagar Mandat, Ranga reddy District in Sy.Nos.93 admeasuring, 4 acres3T guntas, Bg/A admeasuring 2 acres 34 guntas, 92lA admeasuring 36 cruntas, .l0g/A admeasurrng 1 acre 24 guntas, 10g1AA admeasuring 1 acre:23 guntas, 1081E admeasuring 1 acre 23 guntas, 1OS/EE admeasuring 1 acre 23 guntas, 96/4 1 acre 1g guntas, 96tAA admeasuring 1 acre 17 guntas, 96il: admeasuring 1 acre 1g guntas, g6/EE admeasuring 1 acre 18 guntas, 89/AA arimeasuring 1 acre 16 guntas, 109 admeasuring 4 acres 24 guntas, 107/A admeasuring 4 acres 33 guntas, 107rAA admeasuring 1 acres 24 guntas, 107lEE admeasuring 1 acres 25 guntas, .107/U admeasuring i acres 24 a guntas, 107lUU admeasuring 1 acres 24 guntas, 107lRU admeasuring 1 acres 25 guntas, BB/A to BB/U admeasuring 2 acres 10 guntas, 94 admeasuring 1 acres 32 guntas, 'l 10 admeasuring 26 guntas, g'l admeasuring 1 acres 30 guntas total admeasuring 46 acres 37 guntas without following due process of Law in the interest of Justice. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO : 28024 OF 2015) Petition under section '1 51 cpc prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the lst and the 2nd Respondent not to plant trees or interfere with the possession of the Property of the petitioner situated at Kismathpur Village, Rajender Nagar Mandar Ranga Reddy District in sy.Nos 93 admeasuring, 4 acres3T guntas, BB/A admeasuring 2 acres 34 guntas, g2lA admeasuring 36 guntas, 108/A admeasuring 1 acre 24 guntas, 'r og/AA admeasuring 1 acre 23 guntas, 108/E admeasuring 1 acre 23 guntas, i0g/EE admeasuring 1 acre 23 guntas, 96/4 '1 acre 18 guntas, 96/44 admeasuring 1 acre 17 guntas, 96/E admeasuring 1 acre 1 8 guntas, g6/EE admeasuring '1- acre 1B guntas, g9/AA admeasuring '1 acre 16 guntas, 10g admeasuring 4 acres 24 guntas, 1o7tA admeasuring 4 acres 33 guntas, 107 tAA admeasuring 1 acres 24 guntas, 107 tEE admeasuring 1 acres 25 guntas, 1 07lu admeasuring 1 acres ?4 guntas, 1oz tulJ admeasuring 1 acres 24 guntas, lollRU admeasuring 1 acres 25 guntas, BB/A to 8B/U admeasuring 2 acres ',l0 guntas, 94 admeasuring 1 acres 32 guntas, 1 10 admeasuring 26 guntas, 91 admeasurrng 1 acres 30 guntas total admeasuring 46 acres 37 guntas without following due process of Law in the interest of Justice Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI pRATAp NARAYAN SANGHI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR MCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI N.ASHOK KUMAR, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI V.NARASIMHA GOUD, SC FOR HMDA The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.21749 of 2OlS ORDER: This 'vrit petition is filed to declare thc action of respondentr; in not acting upon the complaint liled by the petitioners on 26 .06.20 15 and consequently to direct the respondentr; not to plant trees or interfere with the petitioners lands situated in Kismathp u r Village, Ranjendra .\agar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (for short 'subject lan,f s'.

2. Heard Sri Avadesh Narayan Sanghi, learr-recl Counsel representinil Sri Pratap Narayan Sanghi, learlt,:d Counsel on record for petitioners and Sri V.Narasinrha Goud, 0 0 learned Sta;rding Counsel for HMDA.

3. Learn,:d Counsel for the petitioners rlrawn the attention cf this Court to the counter filt:rl bv the respondent No.4, wherein it is stated that neither respondent No.4 nor its officials have takerL up any plantation rvork in the Kismathpur Village, Rajt:ndranagar Mandal, R.lt.District over the extent of land aclrreasuring Acs.46 - 3i' gts in survey numbers as mentioned in the ) writ petition. Therefore, in view of the stand taken by the respondent No.4, prayed to close the writ petition.

4. Recording the above submission and in the light of stand taken by the respondent No.4 in the counter, the writ petition is closed. Hou,ever, in case, respondents take up any plantation works in the subject lands petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedies available under law. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. i i //TRUE COPYII SD/-K. SREE RAMA MURTHY - DEPUTY REGISTRAR a rsEcTtoN oFFtCER One CC to SRt PRATAP N4Tly{N gANGHt Advocate tOirUCl one cc to SRtv NARASrlrU.qguq" sc ibR"rjtEA topucl r5:frH:SlI3[A:?'idB#n-uEe-A"N'o1i/ fiiin i.,.t r"i the state or tl}o""r"r",,"rl" ?51f,?* one cc to sRt N.AsHoK KUt\rAR, SC FOR GHIvtC lopuc] lwo CD Copies HoME Hish court ror the state or relangana, at To 1 2 3 4 6 PSK. BS HIGH COURT DATED:02t0912025 I I ORDER WP.No.217tlg of 2015 'iti sEP 2u5 ,., -,. i '! CLOSING OlF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS / a

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments