B. Prashanth Goud v. 1. lndian Bank, Represented by its Mana

stitution of lndia praying that in the therewith, the High Court may be more particularly one in the nature of Writ of tVlandamus declaring the action of th Respondents in not considering the representations dated. 2010312023, 2610512 petitioner to provide the employment to th ground is illegal, arbitrary and violative of F Constitution of lndia and consequently di 23, 25107 l2o23and 2610512025 of the petitioner under the compassionate ndamental Rights Guaranteed under ct the respondents to consider the representations 2010312023, 2610512023, 2510712023 and 2610512025 and disposed off the same within stipulated period. LA.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representations 20l03i2023, 2610512023, 25lol l2O23 and 2610512025 and disposed off the same within stipulated period. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI G.DINESH PATIL Counsel for the Respondents : SRI HEMANTH KUMAR VEMURI The Court made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NA AVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO TION N .16059 0 202 ORDER: the d.ction of This writ petition is filed sce ng the following rclief 1..to issue an Order, rection or Writ ntore nature of Writ of particularlg one in t Mandamus declaring considering the respond.ents in n representdtions dated. 2 .o3.2O23, 26.O5.2O23, 25 o;f the petitioner to 25.O7.2023 and 26.O5. prouide th,e emplogment to the petitioner under nd is illegal, arbitrary the compassionate g and violatiue o.f htnd.amental Rights tution o.f India and Guaranteed. under Con consequentlg direct the ond.ent.s to consider the representqtions 2 .03.2O23, 26.05.2023, 25.O7.2O23 and 26.O5. O25 and disposed off the sd.m.e uithin the s lated period and pass rs as it mdg deems Jit such other ord.er or o and. proper in the circu nces o.f the case..."

2. Heard Sri G.Dinesh Patil, I ned counsel appearing for the petitioner ancl Sri Hemanth K ar Vemuri, Iearned Slanding counsel appearing for respondents Bank

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitione r's father late Srinath Goud worke d as Clcrk/ Shro[f SR.No.55509 in the respondents' ank and had rendered 3O years ol un-blemished record of servic Since petitioner's father was suffering from ill-health, his

25.O7 .2023 seeking voluntary re rement filed an application on from service on medical ' -rrr- 2 \\IP 16059 2025 RRN..I grounds and to providc employment to his son who is lhe petitioner herein.

4. l-came.cl counscl lbr the pctitioner further sr-rbmits that based on the saicl :rpplicatiol-r, after conducting evaluzrtion o[ petitioner's fathcr condrtion, thc responden[s have acceptcd his request fcrr voluntary reliremcnt liom service on 20.O9.2024. Subsequently, the fathcr of thc petitioncr rlicd on 13.O4.2025 duc to ill-hcalth, but rhe petitioner was not provirled any cmployment till dat(l

5. Learncd couns<'l lbr the petitioner further sut;mits that since the deceaserl lather of the pe titioner q,ho wrLs the onl5, earning member in thc family and thcre is no other earlling mcmbers in the familv to ckt'out thc livclihood, the petitioner tnerr:k: an application on 26.0.5.2025 bv cnck;sing the required doctrmcnts and seeking employment on c()mpassron:rte grounds. But, till (late no action has bcr-n taken ot) lhal r(.1)rr.senraliun.

6. Learned Standing counsel rcspondents submitted that aftcr lilins of the present r.r,rit petition, the responclents/ Bank Authorities addressed a lett<:r clated 21.O6.2025 to the petitioncr asking him to submit the applic.rtior-r along with copies of thi, required documents for considering the case of the petitioner to lrror.idc crnployntent on compassionatc ground. '\ ! J wP 16059 2025 RRN, J

7. Per contra, leaned counsel fo the petitioncr submits that thc petitioncr had alrcady submitted is application dated 26.05.2025 along with required documents an praycd this Court to direct the respondents lo considcr the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law

8. Learned counsel for the r spondents did not dispute the above submission

9. In view of the submrssrons ade by the learned counsel for respective parties, this Writ Peti on is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to conside the petitioner's representation datcd 26.05.2025 lor providing employment compasslonate grounds and pass appropriate ord rs in accordance with law within a period of (03) three months fro the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous a plications pending, if any, in this ' Writ Petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE C Ylt SD/. A.V.S. PRASAD OEPUW REGISTRAR secloFL?#rcen n DooI N o E 2 The D p Uty Ge t a b

1. The Managing Director and Chief Exe Depa rtm e n offiCE rS t ns H ead offi ce ta Ma n as e r P rSo n off ce J l-i 36 4th r L 0 o H yd e a ad r 2 ASS (] n era M a naq f nd a B a n hT L be rt aza H mava N as a f H yd t v Th ASS G e n efa M a nas e r nd a B a n 1 I q P ot N o 22 b Da ru S ifa H yd ra on C C to S R G D N E a H P T Ad o ne C C to S R H E M N TH KU tvlA R tr F L P h 5 3 5 6 4 tive Officer, lndian Bank, personnel 6, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001 HRD Section Hyderabad Zonal erty plaza, Himayat Nagar, k b k Da ru S Regional ll Zonal Office, 4th Floor, d - 500029 h ifa fa nch b n H yd 5 0U 4 S u Ita n P u fa 2 0 ( ) ca e oP c t U I lRl Adrrnaar^ r.lcll l.\r f.a bad S To W HIGH COURT DATED:281071202s ) '( * /4 L] 11 AUE 2W l',i r ct-,go ./ ORDER WP.No.16059 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. a_ b \