✦ High Court of India · 13 Jun 2025

Sio_A. Ram Reddy v. 1. The State of_Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 13 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
13 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,226 words

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction especially one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 6 in not processing the application of the petitioner to provide extension of supply of Non-domestic connection for commercial contract load on the existing 4 Nos. of 5KW ND/L under SC No.622001637, 01568, 01651, 02058, 't No. 6KW ND/L under SC No.6220 02087 and I No. 2KW ND/L under SC No.6220 0Q222 Measuring total /i load of TBKW to lre premises bearing H No 4-12-925' '\Lrto Sai Nagar' Hayathnagar in ope it'ion, Shanthinagar section of Hayathnagar Sr- b Division as illegal, arbitrary, n v o'ation of Article 14' 21 and 300-A of the Cor sti :ution of lndia and consequeflt'y rr;1'61 the respondents to provide domes'ic clnnection for extension of comnrer. ral contract load on the existing 4 Nos. o1 5K\'V ND/L under SC No.62200163'' (r 568' 01651,02058' 1No 6KWND/L unier SC No6220 02087 and'1 No 2l(// ND/L under SC No6220 02087 and 1 N: 2KW ND/L underscNo.622:0ic222MeasuringtotalloadofTBKWbyctnsideringthe )€ t'tioner dt l 1-01-2025 registered vide Flefer:nce No LTM application of th€)

256730003. IA NO:1OF 2O25 Petition und€ r iection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstzrnces stated in theaffidavitfiledrrl;upportofthepetition,theHighCourtrrrayhepleasedTo direct the respon:(rnts to provide domestic connection f:r extension of commercial contract oad on the existing 4 Nos of 5KW ND/L urder SC 2001637' 01568, 01651, 0210)t, 1 No 6KW NDiL under SC No 6220 02lti7 and 1 No'2KW ND/L under SC lrlc (220 02087 and 1 No2KW ND/L uncler !3C lto6220 00222 Measuring|oadof,'l}KWbyconsideringtheapplicationpetitiorrerdt.ll-01.2025 registered vide Flete ence No.LTM 256730003 pending disposal c'f the main writ petition. Counsel for the Feli:ioner : SRI CH'RAVINDER Counsel for the Re:;oondent No'1 : GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for Respondents No'2to5 : SRI N'SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TSSPDCL Gounsel for the Respondent No'6:SRl SRINIVAS RAO PACHWA'liC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER - t .a I' II THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.16O9O OF 2025 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage. itself.

2. This Writ l)etition is lilcd, undcr Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seckin g Lhc following rclief: ".. to issLe w.it orde.r or dire(:tion especiallu one in the Nature oJ Wnt of Mandamus cleclaring tlle action oJ tlle respo denLs 2 to 6 in not processing the application of the pe-titioner to prooide extension of supplg of Nort domestic ciiaection fir comrnercial cotltract Loo(l ott the eristittg 4 Nos. oI sKW ND/L wlder SC No.622OO1637,01568, ()1651, O2O5B, 1 No. 6KW ND/L under SC No.622O 02087 and 1 No. 2KW ND/L under SC No.6220 00222 Meosuring total load of 78Kw to the prerrlises beQnng ILN2.4-12 925, Auto Sai Nagar, Hagathnagar in oper(ttion, Shc,nth:ilagqr section ol HaAathnag.lr Sub Diubton asillegal, arbitrary, in woldtion of Article 14, 21 and 3OO A of the CorLstitulion of India ancl cot:sequentlg direct the respondents to prouide donlesttc ionnection for exterLsion o{ cornmerciaL cotTtract bad on the' eistirtg 4 Nos' oJ SKW ND/L uncter SC No.622aa1637, 01568, 01651, O2O58, 1 No. 6KW ND/ I' under SC No.622O 02087 and 1 No.2KW ND/L under SC No.622O O2O87 and 1 No. 2KW ND/L LLnde.r SC No 6220 Oo2'22 MeasuirLq total loqd of 78 KW bg consiclering the qpplicottall of Lle lx'tttbner dL.l1Ol-2025 regLstered uide Reference No.l,l'M 25673A00::) o/r.,1 /,4s-J .. "

3. Heard Sri Ch.Ravinder, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Governmcnt Pleacler for F)ncrry for respondent No. 1; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counscl for Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limitcd, for respondent Nos 2 to 5; and Sri Srinivasa Rao Pachwa, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, for respondent No.6.

4. Learned counsel for Lhc pctlt-iorler submits that the subject matter of this Writ Pelition is squarcly covered by the order of this i ) I I i l I t t , *qr,r-+et.' P]{..] ' f, 150l0 .1025 Court in \V.P I r,.24205 of 2024, dated 09.09.2024, an:i r cquested this Courl Lc, 1 zrsrj similar order in the present \r/ril F'- ti ion also' 'lhe samc is , r,r, seriously dispulcd bl' thc lcarrned r-lo.'()rnment Pleadcr as ,r'r I r s learned Standing Counsel fbr tl'rc resl;ol ients'

5. LN VI,.'\ i ilLc abovc submissions and for ih,, rc r,,rrs alike in the orcle:- ) t-lris Court in W.P.No.24205 ol 2 -)2l dated

09.o9.2021 . responderli s' submittcc b' L rcr trng the : is Wril Petition is disposed 'lf (, consider the application, datcd ' 1 O 1.2025, hr pctitioner, for providing cxLensior ll suplrly of Non-dome 's1i : r or-rnccLion for commcrcizrl contr'rt:I t'rt::[ load ol 78KW to th' f,rcmises bt:aring II.No.4-12-925, Art o Sar Nagar, Ha1'athnag'. I r lperation, Sh:rnLhinagar sccLiori of I 1a 'athnagar '.'elangana, and pass appropriat' o'clcrs, in Sub Div sic r' accordani:t' ' ' 1r law, as expeditiously as possiblc, llre li ra l1y rvithin a period o1 t.' r l:.1) wceks from the date of receipr- of a ct py of this order, subje . L(, the petitioner making necess,zlr!- r)a'ment, as stipr-rlatccl rL,t c r ll-rc trlectricity Act, 2003. Misci'l r r.'(,Lrs pctitions pendrng, if an1', sl-rali stalrcl closed. There sh:1. I , rro order as to costs. SD/ MOMINA MEHAR as5Graili nectsrnan \ //TRUE COPY// S,ECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 The Princio rl Secretary, Power and Energy qepartment, Dr' Ii R Ambedkar Telangan;a it cretariat, State of Telangana, Hyderaoao' The Chairmtrr r-cum-Managing Director, Telangana Southe'n l:)ower oilil.Iurt'.," ii rrpJ"v "f iimiieo-, Vioyutn Sou?ha, somajigurla' Hvderabad' nding Engirieer, (Operation), TSSPDCL, Saroor'nagar Circle, Hyderabad. - X?;X-ry@'.:. X&6q;.trry33:..!:*? ! ttt' z-!x?x!!try;t!t&a!!;'91'-rn&'6try"?J

3. The Superirt r: Saroorna13ar I I I l

4. The Divisional Engineer/Technical, Saroornagar Circle, TSSPDCL. Hyderabad.

5. The Assistant Engineer, (Operation), Saroornagar Circle. Hyderabad. 6. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund, Hyderabad.

7. One CC to SRI CH.RAVINDER, Advocate. IOPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 9. OneCCto SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FORTGSPDCL. [OPUC] 10.One CC to SRI SRINIVAS PACHWA, SC FOR GHMC. [OPUC] '1 1. Two CD Copies. BSK PSK HIGH COURT DATED: 1 310612025 ( I t CC TODAY ORDER WP.No.16090 of 2025 .4't.t!,I .+ ra; 4r,t 1 i JiN 2i}25 z * DISPOSING DF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT GOSTS I I i LD 1

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments