Adharaveni Mallaiah v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition Under Article 226 o1 the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in interfering with the personal life and liberty of Petitioners family disputes with the respondent No-4 to 6 and with the alleged foisted money issues and also disturbing him to do his agriculture activities on his own agriculture land in Sy no- 34 A/B for an extent

0.700 and sy.no- 34 clBtNB for about an extent of 0.0175 Bs in Sy.no-34 D/A for an extent of 0.350 and in Sy no- 38 B/A for an extent of c 2000 and in sy no-40 A/A for an extent of 0.2800 and in Sy no- 46 E/B for an extent of 0.800, and in sy no-297|D for an extent of 0.800 total agriculture land of pet tioner of an extent of ,l acre 1.3625 guntas and disturbing him while he is cultivating his agriculture land. That the respondent no.3 acting on the influence of the R,)spondents 4 to 6 that the respondent no 3 forcing the petitioner to pay money tu them and to settle the civil dispute, in which the respondent no 4 and s no where related to any money transaction with the petitioner but the respondent no 3 r; rllrng the petitioner to come to police station everyday to set e the alleged foisttrd money dispute with the respondent no 4 and 5 which is illegal and contrary to rrrw and infringement of Fundamental Rights of the petitioners as guaranteed un( er Articre 19, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia. I.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the oircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cou 1 may be preased to direct the Respondent No.3 in interfering with the persorar rife and riberty of Petitioner's famrly disputes with the respondent No-4 to 0 and with the alleged foisted money issues and arso disturbing him to do his agricurture acrivities on his own agriculture land in sy no- 34 AIB lor an extent 0.700 16 sy.no- 34 clBlNB for about an extent of 0.0'r 75 gs in sy.no-34 D/A for an ext.nt of 0.350 and in sy no- 38 B/A for an extent of 0.2000 and in Sy no-40 A/A for an extent of 0.2800 and in sy no- 46 E/B for an extent of 0.g00, and in sy no-2'91 rD for an extent of 0.800 total agriculture land of petitioner of an extent of 1 ac,e 1.362s guntas and disturbing him while he is cultivating his agriculture land rhat the respondent no.3 acting on the infruence of the Respondents 4 to 6 that the respondent no 3 forcing the petitioner to pay money to them and to settre ther civir dispute, in which the respondent no 4 and 5 no where rerated to any mone) transaction with the petitioner but the respondent no 3 calling the petitioner to come to police station everyday to settle the afleged foisted money dispute with the respondent no 4 and 5 pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s PAGILLA JAYANTHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 6 : - / The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER '--------7i THE HON'BIE SRI JUSTTCE T. VTNOD KUI,IAR ORDER: Writ P on No.1 7 of 20 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learn,:d Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3, and with the consent of the rearned counser appearing for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage 2' Having regard to the manner of disposar of the writ petition at the admission stage and the nature of /rs invorved, this court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.4 to 6 is nol: necessary for adjudication of the present Writ petition.

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that, thougr there exists family dispute between the petitioner and respondent Ncs.4 to 6, the 3'd respondent is interfering with the personal life and riberty of the petitioner at the behest of the unofficial respondents and ccercing him to settle the money issue with the unofficial respondents, which action of the respondents-authorities it is contended as illegal, arbitrar/ and without sanction of law.

4. Per contr4 learned Government pleader for Home irppearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 wourd submit that based on the compraint made by the unofficial respondents herein, the authorities ha,re registered a case, vide Crime No.332 of 2023 against the investigating into the same. petitior er and are 2

5. Learned Government Pleader further submits that in the course of investigation into the aforesid crime registered against the petitioner, the authorities have recorded the statements of LWs I to 4 and further investigation is in progress; that the :'d respondent authority in the course of investigation into the aforesaid crime has visited the scene of offence; and that except recording the evidences oF LWs.1 to 4 and visiting the scene of offence, he is not interfering in the civil dispute or in the family dispute betvveen the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, much less interfering in the life and liberty of the petitioner.

6. The aforesaid submission made by the harned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent No.1 to 3 is taken on record.

7. Having regard to the submissions made as above, and taking note of the fact that a case, vide Crime No.332 of 2023 is registered against the petitioner, this Court is of the view that the respondents-authorities are to be directed to conduct investigation into the aforesaid crime strictly in accordance with law, in an expeditious manner. B. Subject to above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

9. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. /ITRUE COPYI' D/ K. BHAVANI SWAMY TANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER ent, TS Secretariat' To

1. The PrinciPa I Secretary to Home DePartment' De State of Telang ice Siric illa at Siricilla rinten ana at H dent of Pol yderabad

2. The SuPe - r.-r^,,-o Officef . Yeltared dypet Police Station, SuPerintendent ---------\ / /r Hvderabad. [OUT]

4. iwo CCs to GP FOR HdME, High Court for the State o1 Telangana at s. oire-c-C to Hrtls. pActLLA JAYANTHI, Advocate IoPUCI 6. Two CD CoPies SA GJP ry, \ I ,., 1 /4' t-\ ,,j li:t 0 t\, \ ,1_ \.."r. ","l'r (). I cil 295 \\j ] .rl // t I HIGH COURT .\ DATED:20lOGl202S ORDER WP.No.17040 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS. 4 I l