✦ High Court of India · 13 Jun 2025

M.MADHUSUDAN REDDY v. The State Of Telangana. Represented by Principal Secretary to It/unicipal

Case Details High Court of India · 13 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
13 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,233 words

Petition Lnce- s;ection 151 Cpc praying that in the,lircLmstirnces stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court rnay be preased to DIRECT the Rersr.ron.ent No.2 and 3 to held up or stop th: e|:ction process pending disposal r;f :lrr: writ petition. Counsel for the p,:rtit oner : SRI RAJKUMAR GUMMI counsel for the R,:rspc,ndents No.1 : Gp FoR McpL ADMN uRBAr,r DEV counsel for the Rr:'spcndents No.2to5 : sRr M.SRTKANTH REtrDy, TGilc The Court made fire f :llowing: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.16O16 OF 2025 ORDER: . With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition IS taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself.

2. This Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of t]r.e Constitution of India, seeking the following relief "---to a) issue uiL order or direction, more pGrTtcularllJ one i4 nature of Writ of Manddmus or anA other appropnaLe Luit de-claring the in^ction of Respondent No.2 dnd :J ir (:o sldeinq A represertatlon dated 14 OS 2025 and 22 05 2025 contatnolQ oblect@ns to condu(:ting of elections uide proceedings N1.TCIIC/ MDCL'SDPT/ ELectbtt/ t-lppal/ 2025 ddted O6-os 2025 to -IALA tlpp;t Seruice Soc@tA t.e.- Respottdent rrurnber 5 without fotlouing reuisbd guidehnes of TCIIC uide Circuktr No.A?llC/ IALA,/ HO/ Cui.leLines/ 2O 13 2OO date(t 10 1O-2O13 and Reutsed Memoronclurn, Rules ancl Regulations oJ Seruice Societies uide TCIIC ciratlar No.525/ TSIIC/ LAC/ KINGPIASS/ SS/ 2OO2 24 dated 21 10 2016 is illegal, unconstltutional, arbitrary dncl uiolatiue of Articles 14, 21 and 3OO A of the Constrluttott of htdia and/ or b) tssue LL'nt, order or dlrectiorL, nnre pQrticularlA one irl nature of Wnt of Maadamus or anlJ other appropnaLe' uit to Resportdett No-2 and 3 conduct free and fair elections (ls lrer Reulsed Guidei,ne-s (2013) and Reuised Memorandum, Rules and Regulatotls of tlt. seruice socrcties (2016) onlg after giuing opportunitg for enrollotg trew mentlrcrs attd reneuing existing memberships to the seruice socrctu Q d LrtcLude attd giue oppoftunitg to contest elections to members Jrom IndustnQl, oo n\ercrcTl uttd Residentidl propertA ou)ners uithtn Notified Are'a. c, Pass... "

3. Heard Sri Rajkumar Gummi, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration for respondent No. 1; Sri M.Srikanth Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, for respondent Nos.2 to 4. 4 IS Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner the Senior Entrepreneur of respondent No.S-Soclety and Ex- 2 PK,J \1t l(J0lrj 2025 President r, trl Chairman of respondent I o..l Authority. \ Responden. llt.2 issued proceedings, dated 06.05.2025, for conductirrg e rt r tions to IALA Uppal Service Soci,:tr. tr. r- ominating an Elecr.ic r f fficer. Subsequently, the pc ritio rcr macle a representat ion to respondent No.2 on 22.O5.2025 -ec1r rssing his grievance ,,nc the same is pending conside-arir n. Therclore, learned cor ,ns el prays this Court to direct rcr;por dr:n t No.2 to consider :h (r r 3 presentation, dated 22.05.2025, sr-rb mi tt :d b_v the petitioner alc Fass appropriate orders within a stipll atc< period of time.

5. Lea-n,:c Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.lt to 1 submits that since the r:presentation, dated 22.O5.2O25, sutmitlcd bl, the petitioner is prr'rrcling consideration, respondent No.2 u il consider the same ,rr d 1,irss appropriate orders, in accordance rvith larr,,.

6. Havinlg r:gard to the submissions made b'. ler rne i counsel for the res;pr:c[ \ e parties and without going into the rner its ol the case, this \.\ n: I)etition is disposed of directing respo;tdcr.t No.2 to pass apprf I)nr t.l orders on the representation, daLc( 22 O5.2O25, submitted trr' he petitioner, strictly in accordance rvrtl L larv, as expeditiousl,- : s possible, preferably within a perioC o four (4) weeks from l1.r: date of receipt of a copy ol this o -dcr and communica t ,: ,'i r:opy thereof to the petitioner. 3 PK,J Wp 16A16 .2025 1 Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs //TRUE COPY// SD/.S. MALLIKARJU NA RAO TANT REGISTRAR AS SECTION OFFICER To, ,l.ThePrincipalsecretarytotr,4unic]PalAdministrationandUrbanDevelopment Deoartment Dr. B.R nr6"irlr-iJungina secretariat, Hyderabad,state of Teiangana, Telangana-500022. 2. fhe Zonal Manager Zonal Office, Telangana lndustrial lnfrastructure Corporation Ltd, lndustrial Park. Jeedimetla HYderabad-S 00055 J The Election Officer and Deputy Zonal. VqlgSgt' fnira.iiu"tui" Corporation Ltd Medchal-Siddipet Jeedimetla, HYderabad- 500055. Telanoana lndustrial 7one.' Zonal Office

4. The Commissioner, lndustrial Area Local Authority (IALA)- Uppal K-2' Plot No.9, lDA, UPPaI HYderabad-500039 lndustrial ereas servic!"'5JIi"iv iur'lrrltinssl' Plot No g' IDA' Uppal 5.TheViceChairman(NomineeofTGllC).K-2,l.JooalNotifiedMunicipal Hyderabad-500039

6. One CC to SRI RAJKUMAR GUMMI, Advocate lOPUCl 7. Two CCs to GP FoR IMCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

8. One CC to SRI M.SRIKANTH REDDY' SC FOR TSIIC IOPUCI 9. Two CD CoPies BSKarw I I I I I { HIGH COLIFIT DATED:1 3t(t,612025 I ._r ,i (ii \l /r, t".- ORDER WP.No.1601(; of 2025 DISPOSING oF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT C(:)STS ,'>\ a 6 I \1i( ). L C, i 1 JUt'l 2U5 ,r sn aO ir rj i-r ,

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments