The High Court · 2025

Judgment

7. Pochamma @ Pushpamma, Wo K Veeraswamy. D/o late J. Malliah, aged about el years Occ- Household. R/o 8-4, Lakdapa. Eeda Pasha Mailaram, Medal- District- 502 307- B. Susheela, W/o Bantu Pochiah, D/o late J. Mallaiah, Aged about 6& yrs, Occ- Household., R/o 1-8'l,Sangareddy, Chidrupa, Medak District. J. Yadiah, S/o Late J. Mallaih @ Pedda Malliah, Aged about 58 yrs. Occ- Business, J. Balraj, S/o late J. .Saftiah, Grand son of Late J. Malliah @ Pedda Malliah, Aged about 48 yrs, Ooo Business. J. Pochiab, S/o Lab.J. Saftiah, grand son of Late J. Maltiah @ Pedda Malliah. Aged about z16 yrs, Occ- Business J. Anjanyulu, S/o lab J. Safriah, Grand son of Late J. Malliah @ Pedda Malliah, Aged about 58 yrs, Occ- Business. J. Pa4ma, Wo Lab .J. Mallesh, Daughter in law of J. Sattiah, Aged about 33 yls, Occ- Household, Mass J. Nikhita, D/O late J. Mallesh Aged 22 yrs, Occ- Student

8. 9. Miss J. Ankitha, D/o late J. Mallesh, Aged about 20 yrs, Oe Student, Respondent Nos. 3 b I are R/o.H.No. 1-34, Madinaguda, Serilingampally, RR Districf

10.The Sub Regisfar, Having offioe at Moosapet, Ranga Reddy

'l 1. The Disrict Registrar, Having office at Moosapet, Rana Reddy ...RespondentslDefendants Petition under Section '151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of 0re petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant ad interim injunction order thereby restraining the respondents, their men; agents, GPAs, S.P.A.s and persons claiming through and under them ftom alienating, disposing off or creating third party rights in iespect of the petition schedule properties 'A to 'E , in any manner whatsoever, pending dispca'i of the suit. PETITION SCHEDLLE A' PROPERW All that agricultural land admeasuring 17 Guntas, in Sy. No, 63, situated at Madinaguda Mllage, Serilingampalh Mdndal. RR District, baunded by- North-Land underSy. No. 67 South-Land under Sy. NO. 63/ a/ 1 AND 63/AA East-Part of Sy. No. 65 and 66 West-Part of Sy. No. 62. PETITION SCHEPULE'B' PROPERTY All that agricultural land admeasuring 28 guntas, in Sy. No. 62, situated at Madinaguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, RR District, bounded by- North-Land under Sy. No. 62 South-Land under Sy. No. 63 East-Part of Sy. No. 63 West-land under Sy. No. 69. PETITION, SCHEEULE'C' PROPERW All that agricultural land admeasuring Ac 1..G) guntas, in Sy. No. 6i, situated at Madinaguda Village, Serilingampally Manclal, RR Distric( boirnded by- North- Maniira Pipe line South- land belonging to Komariah East- Do West- land under Sy. No. 69 PETITION SCHEDUI-E'D PROPERW Alt tfiat agricultural lan6 admeasuring 17 guntas, in Sy. No. 6UA, situated at Madinaguda Mllage, Serilingampally Mandal, RR District, bounded by- North-Land underSy. No. 63/A South-Manjira Pipe line East-land under Sy. No. 62 West-Part of Sy, No. 63 PETITION SCHEDULE'E' PROPERW All that agricultural land admeasuring 31 guntas, in Sy. No. 121 situated at Madinaguda Mllage, Serilingampally Mandal, RR District, bounded by- North-Land underSy. No. '123 South-Land underSy. NO. 150 East-land under Sy. No. 121 part West-land under Sy. No. '124 and 120. eounsel for the Appellant :SRl MOHD. ADNAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI RA.IA GOPALLAVAN TAYI The Court delivered the following: Judgment THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKAYARA C.MANo.Z1 of 2025 ITIDGMENT: This Gvil Miscellaneous App.d is filed by the appellaff eggrieved bythe orrder dxed,27.022025 passed in IANo.1642 of 2Ol9 in O.S.No.329 of 2A]9 on rhe file of ttre VI Addfuional District and Sessioru Judge, Ranga Reddy Districr et Kukatpalln wherein a petirion filed under Oder 39 Rules I arrdz read with Secdon 151 CPC seeking tfmpora{f injunction has been dismissed

2. Hearid Sd Llohd. Adnaq learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Raja Gopallavan Tayi; learned cotrnsel for respondent No2.

3. [rarned coumel for appellanr submimed tfrat primary grotrnd for chalhnging the impugrred order is that the leamed VI Addfuional Districr and Sessions J*dg. h^ erroneously madred the documens on behalf of the respondenm in ? series' as well as 'Rseries'ie., Exs.Pl toP29 and E:s.Rl to R4. The appellaru'S docurnents were nor exhibfued at all The merits of the case were 2 also argue4 bur the sarrc are not necessaryto be discussed at this stage as this Court has rot gone into the merits of the -rtt t 4. Iramed counsel for respondenr M2 submimed that the appelladt rld not request the trial C-oun to mart his daumerr as qrhibits. The respondena filed a petition to Ylr;*E the ad intelirz urwncuon grarned in favour of the appellam and in the said interlocr*ory application, dre doc,unens in ? series'i bave been marlred on behalf of the respondens and therefore, an error crcpt in kamed counsel funher submiaed tlut merns of the mater be considered. 5 This Coun is of the opinion that dre order passed by the trial Coun refening to the documents of ttre respo"deots as those of tlre appellant is a fuing error and dre sarrr cari nelther be supported nor ignored to proceed to corsider the qeritg of ttre case. Afrer the doctunents of both the panies are exhibire4 ttre meris of *re respetive cases qln be considered- In the circumstances, as requested bydre appe[aff, the matter needs to be remanded for fresh dirpou"L

6. In viewof the foregoing discussion and wfthout eryr€ssutg \. any opinion on the meris of the case, the Gvil Miscellaneous \ 3 App.rl is allovred and the impugned orrder qr.d zz,o2.2oz| passed in Ia-Irto .1642 of 2ot9 in o.S.No ,329 of 2019 lis aside. The learned vI Addfuional Districr and Sessioos l,rdge, -.-. Ranga Reddy ar Kulapdllr it direaed to dispose of I.ANo,.l642 ' .:.. of 20L9 afresh by ma*ing tlre documenrc'of borh the paaies, s,fuhin a period of rhree montls fircm rhe date of retripr of. e copyof this orrder. No cosrs. ' Ir4iscellaneotrs petitions pending, rf uryshall stand closed- SDI. A.V.S.S.C.S.M.SARMA JOINT / /,TRIJE COPYII S OFFICER To,

1. The Vl Additional District and sessions Judge, RR District at Kukatpally(With records, if any) ?. 9* CC to SRt MOHD. RDNAIi, Advocate t0pucl 3" One CC to SRt R/\JA GOPAL|-AVAN TAy;Advocate tOpUCI 4. Two CD Copies ADK'PSL HIGH COURT DATED:1211112025 JUDGMENT CMA.No.241 of 2025 ALLOWING THE CMA WITHOUT COSTS .6 ' :*- \. 17 Lii m6 I ,i :+\. - ,r.- . ) ,.. \.\.- _il -1.'' .:/ t. 'r-i{f'l) -:'' :'...;;')''- \. .l l '' ,/