Criminal Appeal No. 1010 of 2019 · Telangana High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
appellant/ defacto r:omplainant' this Criminal Appeal is dismissed as
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Consequentl1 , miscellaneous applications' if any' sha1l stand dismissed /ITRUE COPY// SdI- M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR r\ \'"'-- ],J ii secrtou oFFICER to'', ,n" ll Additir)rral JuniorCivil Judge. Cum XlXAdditional Metropolilan .,i:H[{i,":'e:1r0""::3l3ib?',i3i"" airr$iil$.l'ffi g l*: gg;*;:J,3:""1"41J:iilSnB[Xn"i", the state of reran!:rana at 6. Two…
Judgment
Cause title
Criminal Appeal U/s 378 (4) and 312 ot Ct:.p.C against the Judgment made in c.c.No.750 of 201 6 dated 09.0s.2019 on the fire of the I Additional Junior civil Judge cum XrX Additional Metroporitan Magistrate, cyberabad at Malkajgiri, Hyderabad. Between: Seethamraju Sri Lakshmi, Wo ChurLamani Chandra Shekar, D/o J. Sitarama chandramurthv. aoed about ra years. _occupation-ii-o,]se"noia,-nr"rio ii-+Ze, ilir? HMW, DrA.S. Nalar. Secunder?,oia. rerJ"[a".'btli"" "" ffi esuruvDEFACTO COMPLATNANT 1. seetharnraju chudamani chandra Shekar, s/o. Venkata subba Rao. Aoe.37 years, Occ. Pvt Job, R/o. ptot No.137, Tutasi Nitayinr,-lafitfii N;;;i,'R;;' No.8, Nagole, L.B. Naqar. 2. Velidandala Tulasi Vaia prasadini, Wo. Venkata Subba Rao, Age. 64 years, Occ. House wife, R/o. prot No 137, rurasi wiiayJm, [alitn, riig""i noii'iio b, Nagole, L. B. Naoar. 3. seethamraju. HohamikaHemanth Kumar. s/o. Venkata Subba Rao. Aoe. 3g years, R/o. Plot No 137. Tulasi Nilayam, t_atitna Nigai,-noa;-tt,i dlf.f'rdJf"l" L.B. Nagar.
4. Seethamraiu Venkata S_ubba Rao. S/o. Seshagiri Rao, Age.69 years, Occ. Retd. Govt Emotovee ny o. ptot-r.ro. r sz, f ri-"'si'r.iiiiyrm, Latitha Nagar, Road No.8, Naqole, L.B.'Naoar. 5. The state of rerangan-a, Through Sub-rnspector of porice. p.S. Kushaiouda cyberabad Repreienteb btlts"iubii; pr":.".l-tbi ntir, c"r,ii jiiiljtYj[""r ..,RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Telangana Counsel for the Appeilant : SRt ABHTNAV KRTSHNA UppALURt Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : SMT K. SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent No.s : pUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: JUDGMENT l I I , I I
JUDGMENT:
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL APPEAL No'1O1O OF 2()19 1 Learned courrsel for the appellantl defacto compiainarrt submits the defacto complainant a1ld the respondent/ accL sed have compromisedthemiltterandsettledtheirissues'Accordirrgly'Memo dated 20.O2 -2025 seeking permission to withdraw the aPPeal was also f,rled.
Permission is a-ccorded'
Operative part
Recording the: submission of t1-re learned counsiel for the appellant/ defacto r:omplainant' this Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Consequentl1 , miscellaneous applications' if any' sha1l stand dismissed /ITRUE COPY// SdI- M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR r\ \'"'-- ],J ii secrtou oFFICER to'', ,n" ll Additir)rral JuniorCivil Judge. Cum XlXAdditional Metropolilan .,i:H[{i,":'e:1r0""::3l3ib?',i3i"" airr$iil$.l'ffi g l*: gg;*;:J,3:""1"41J:iilSnB[Xn"i", the state of reran!:rana at 6. Two CD CoPies Ks/kam Hvderabad l()t''lT) 'ffi HIGH COURT DATED:21 10212025 JUDGMENT CRLA.No.1010 of 2019 1 tj.€ S TAr{ ( ,.(- 11 APR 2t,25 2 o I t/ t ir cl DSSri, li(:,'r =J Dismissing the Crl.A as Withdrawn. lD