The High Court · 2025

Petition Under Ser;rron 151 cpc praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affrdavit frled in sup,ort of the pi:tition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to conduct enquiry by issuing notice to the petitioner before making any chanqes in the revenue record pertaining to rand in survey No. No.630, 61 7, 618, 620, 621, 619, 582, 583, 613, 609, 18, 607, 63, 614, 615, 608, 1060' 749' 1021 ' 1026' 753, 19. 62 and 237 at Karur Virage & Mandar and arso was pattedar in Suvrey N,r.82, 91. 98, j00, 1O2, 103, 104, 1O5, j06, 109, 1.1 t, 1 I3 & 133 situated at Nuthankal Vjllage, Tallada Mandal. Counsel for the petitioner SRI K-RATHANGA PANI REDDY [:ilttf. the Respondents : sRt R.LAXMtKANTH REDDy, AGp FoR The Court made the following ORDER . .. '*:, THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.19879 ol 2O2O ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief: ". . . .to issue an order, direction or utit more pctrticularly one in the nature of urit of Ma ndamus declaing the proposed impugned action of the 3d respondent and 4ttL in proceeding to mutate the nomes of the enroachers bg issulng pottedar passbooks and title deeds for the agianltural land in Surueg nos.63}, 617, 618, 620, 621, 619, sB2, 583, 613, 609, 18, 607, 63, 614, 615, 608, 1060,749, 1021, 1026, 753, 19, 62 and 237 at Kallur Village and Mandal and also was pattedar in Surueg Nos.82, 91,98, 100, 102, 10s, 104, 105, 106, 109, 111, 113 and 133 situated at Nuthankal Village, Tallada Mandal though petitioner late father is the pattedar/ ouner of the said land as per the reuenue record Adangal and uithout conducting ang enquiry ctnd issuing ang notice to petitioner tuhtch is mandated as per laut and Full Bench Judgment of the Honourable High Court reported in AIR 2OO8 AP 15, as illegal arbitrary uiolatiue of Article 14, 19, 21 and 3O0 A of the Constitutiort of India and pass..."

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for the respondents and perused the record. ...-- I I Pagc 2 of4

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wouid submit that the father of the petitioner iater Abdul Ha,leem was pattedar ald passbook holder of vast extent of land including the land rn Sy.Nos.63O, 617, 618, 620, 621, 619, 582, 583, 613, 609, lA, 607, 63, 614, 615, 608, 1060, 749, IO2l, 1026, 753, 19, 62 zu'rd 237 at Kailur Village and Mandal and also patteclar in Sv.Nos.S2, 91, 98, 1OO, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 109, 111, 113 and 133 situated at Nuthankal Village, Tallacla Mandal. After the demise of the father of the petitior-rer. the petitioner along rvith his two brothers and four sisteres have migrated rn search of livelihood and have been out of the village for considerable period and occasior-ra1l1, used to come to village to take care of the aforesaid la,nds. As on today, adalgai shorvs the land is in the name of the petitior-Ler's father. Taking advantage of their absence, some land grabbers have encroached the aforesaid lald and also taking steps to mutate the property in their name iilegall)r \\rithout any title

4. 1 l,earned counsel further submitted that respondent Nos.3 and 4 suctTrtrbing to political pressures put forth by J Page 3 of4 the encroachers are taking steps to mutate the property in name of encroachers without issuing notice to the petitioner and u,ithout conducting anr, cnquirv basing on the forged and fabricated Sada Bainamas. To that effect, the petitioner made a representatron to respondent No.2 about the illega1 action of respondent Nos.3 and 4, Despite receiving the same, respondent No.2 has not acted upon it. Hence, the present writ petition

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner made representation long back and hence seeks to direct the petitioner to make a fresh representation to respondent No.2. Upon receiving the same, respondent No.2 will consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with

6. In the light of the aJoresaid discussion, this Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to respondent No.2 within a period of 4 (four) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On frling such representation, respondent No.2 Pagc 4 of4 sha-ll consider the same and pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law within a period of 12 weeks thereon There shall be no order as to costs As a sequel, miscellareor-rs petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/-M. JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR .?. \_-./ SECTION OFFICER To

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Khammam District. 3. The Tahsildar, Kallur [v1andal, Khammam District 4. The Tahsildar, Tallaria Mandal, Khammam District. 5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI

6. ohe CC to SRI K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CD Copies SA BS YY HIGH COURT DATED:1910912025 ORDER WP.No.19879 of 2020 J ,t * 2 I 02B t0 6'( .Dz () * DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. rA cqP \o r -W"sb J ti+l!-a'i!: a-.: