1. Kola Satyanarayana' S/o late Lingaiah' AS9d.-^ 15 v. Porice' r\Iamno.or' waransar District'

1. The State of Telangana' Rep by its Principal Secretary' Home Department' ,. ?f;3'"t3'"1\'#1S,3i3"t" Police' Near Public Garden' Hanamkonda' . TftslTlit8frll:ll!1"* "t 4 The Circle lnspector or cii""l rtrl'innoot' warangal District 5. The Sub-lnspector ot rolicJ'-Mi*noo'' Warangal Djslrict' G Kudikala sudhakar *'ol'"J6'ffi*i;'.;^sF- 6' vears occu- Llc Agent rto ' hqi'ffi#iEh tr'-"'tHft#fl9il;-i,,{E[?'f:t. :::,^:";i i: ' [:l[lJilii:t1X?]3 n,?;,,, wJL"s;q Distri-ct .^ e. Nimirara Sa.da.nandam, Ifl itit"'i"rl,-'s"di^731"",r1ji occu- Business r/o " H.No. 19-1-104, Yad.avanagat Rangasnarpet'rvi^ilX'b..r- r o. iirnoirt rrrruneshwar Naik, s/o Rithiram' ageo-. 5r.ye: '" t"'b,"yi ininoa' perirlo''i""lriiiij' iilv'1irtt'' n"'+Xil.y,il'i-qi' r r.iiir'i.iZlriiu] vo'cnanoru ased- 37 vears' occu- 12.sumiva Khanam, *1" driiiilljoto Firoi'c frf"o 29 vears. occu- Housewife' '' ;;'ii':t'6. d-i-+s6ir, nripuri, Hanamkondb, Hanamkonda District' ls'D"u;;rli-srinivas Rao,"Jo Laxminarayana age.d- 43 years' occu- Employee ' " ;;'ti.lt6. +-+-s6. canohinagar, Kotha judem' Khammam District' 14.i6;;;; sj.a-tiv", *i" rrtt-sri"iri'-uoed-.42 vears, occu- Housewife' r/o '- ii;;;"N;.4, r.r.dt hro ofiice, Thimma-pur Hav6li, Rangashaipet, warangal District. r s ilr]ii v.errswamy, s/o Buchaiah, aged- 49.years,. occu- Business r/o H.No.S- '" oo. ftfi,iit tilOu pijtrot Pump, Thimmapur' Hanamkonda Warangal District' ro ir,l'ri-.'i,-j1i-'.Lir,i, *lo sror,akar, aged- j? years, occu- Housewife, r/o H.No. 8- 17.it/;dl;Cdiiu,'slo r<orfiuraiati, ag"eo- 73 ve-ars' occu- Business r/o H No'19- ...RES'ONDENTS Road, Hanumannagar, Hanairkonda,-Warangal. District' ij-++g,snurbhunipet,Warangal'WarangalDistrict 7-61, Girmajipet, Waranqal, Warangal Drstrrct' Govt. employee ?l'r'!it^u. I i I I j i I i ctrcum Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the stances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleas ed to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Azlandamus declari ng the action of the respondents No. 2 to 5 in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and respondents 6 to 17 rn respect of the land of an exte nt of Ac.3-12 gts. tn Sy.No. 1441A and B situated at Urus sivar, Khila Waranga I Mandal, Warangal District while the suits filed the respondents 6 to 1Z are pe nding consideration before the competent court of law and threatening the petitioners to vacate the patta land owned and possessed by the petitioners under the collusion and influence of the respondents 6 to 17 as iliegal and arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequenfly direct respondents 2 to 5 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in Sy.No_144lA and B of an extent of Ac.3_ '12 gts situated at Urns sivar, Khila Wa rangal Mandal, Warangal District IA NO: 10F 2025 petition under Secti the arrdavt r eo n suppooJ;:;ffi;lill;:;,ff.;:;::T,'";:::.; direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to interfere with the civir dispute pending adjudication before the competent court of raw in respect of rand.of an extent of Ac3-12 gts. ln Sy.No.144lA and B situated at U sivar' Khila warangar, warangal District pending disposal of the writ petition Counset for the petitioner: SRl. SHASHANK GARIGE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to5: Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6to17:__ The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE T' VINOD KUMAR S/RIT oN No. t7266 oF 20/25 ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner' learned on behalf of for Home apPearlng Government Pleader respondent Nos'1 to 3' and with the consent of learned Counsel the Writ Petition is taken uP for appearing for the Partles' hearing and disposal at the stage of admission' 2. Having regard to the nature of lis involved and the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition' this Court is of the view that notice to unofhcial respondent Nos'6 to 17 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition' 3. The case of the petitioner' in brief is that while there exists civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofhcial respondents, the respondent Nos'2 to 5 are interfering in civil disputes without any authority or sanction of law and thus' the action of the said respondents is illegal and arbitrary' 4. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos l to 5 while denying the writavermentswouldContendthatthelstpetitioner,ssonhad made a call to Diai 1OO, upon which the Patrolling Team 2 attached to tfu6 4*r subject site. respondent police station had visited the r. On the patrolling Team visiting the subject site ancl noticing that there are di5p111." between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent herein in relation to thr: subject land which are subject matter of various civil sutts before the competent Court of civil jurisdiction, the respondcnt authorities have direcred lhe part.tes to resolve the dispute before the competent Court of civil jurisdiction, without creating lari, and order issues in the area.

6. Learned Government pleader further submits that the respondent authorities except responding to Dial l0O call made by th6 1"r petitioner,s son are not interfering in the civil disputes and as of date no compliant has been received against the petitioner herein by the authorities to initiate any action. 7. The aforesaid submission made by the learned Government pleader for Home is taken on record. 8. In vrew of the aforesaid submission anci taking note of the fact that there are inter secivil disputes between the petitioner and the unofflcial respondents which are subject matter varrous suits pending before I the competent Court of civil I I a I 1 this Court is of the jurisdiction at Warangal and Ham.rmkonda' view that the respondent authorities are to be directed not to interfere with the civil disputes' Further' it is made clear that in the event of any complaint being lodged or registered against the petidoner' the respondent authorities are directed to take further action strictly in accordance with law' 9. Subject to the above directlon' disPosed of' No costs' the Writ Petition case being 'any IS Miscellane ous Petitions' if anY' pending in the Writ Petition, shall stand closed' ,,TRUE COPYII T,i.l[,,?]-ISeiJi'#E secfon oFFlcER To, \ 1 2 J. 4. 5. 6 7 a ffiffiHmffi:::: a B M KS I HIGH COURT DATED:23 tO6t2O2s ..-:::\ - rj J,rI_-.\ <.. \\. 0 H sEP 206 (. : ,' ,l t), 1Y. Lrfil .' .-.+-.-:a;2' -)i ---l ORDER WP.No.17266 of 2O2S DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \\ I