Patlolla Naveen Kumar Reddy v. Department

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue 2. The Commissioner, C.C.L.A., Telangana, Hyderabad. 3. The District Collector, Vikarabad, Vikarabad District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikarabad Division, Vikarabad District. 5. The Tahsildar, Puduru l\,4andal, Vikarabad District. 6. The Mandal Surveyor, Puduru Mandal, Vikarabad District. 7. C.Amarender, S/o. Narsimhulu, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl,/o. 8. Chinthakindi Yadagiri, S/o. Bheemaiah, Aged about 47 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o.Kankal Village, Puduru Mandal, Vikarabad Districl. 9. Chinthakindi Srinivas, S/o. Bheemaiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ. . Agriculture, Rl/o. Kankal Village, Puduru ft/andal, Vikarabad District. '10. Chinthakindi Naresh Kumar, S/o. Bheemaiah, Aged about 34 years, Occ. Agriculture, Kankal Village, Puduru Mandal, Vikarabad District. Kankal Village, Puduru IVandal, Vikarabad District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.S and 6 in interfering into the peaceful possession of the Petitioner from his land to an extent of Ac.'l - 04 gts. in Sy.No.170iAli6, and to an extent of Ac.8-37 gts. in Sy.No.169/4,4, which is situated at Kankal Village of Poduru Mandal, Vikarabad District and trying to dispossess the petitioner from his cultivating land and threatening to hand over the land of the petitioner to the Respondent Nos.7 to 1 0 without issuing any notice and without following the due proct> arbitrary, u nconstitu tional and violation of Articles 14, 'l Constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles o' consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 not peaceful possession of the Petitioner from his land to an el( Sy.No.170/4116, and to an extent of Ac.8-37 gts. in S1'. situated at Kankal Village of Poduru Mandal, Vikarabat dispossess the Petitioner from his cultivating land and nrl over the land to the Respondent Nos.7 to 10, pending s of law, is illegal, ;, 21 and 300-A of Natural Justice and o in terfere into the -.nt of Ac.'1-04 gts. in '1o.169/44, which is District and not to to threaten to hand lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the . in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cot direct the Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 not to interfere into th: of the Petitioner from his land to an extent of Ac.1-04 gts. ir to an extent of Ac.8-37 gts. in Sy.No.169/4,4, which is siluz of Poduru Mandal, Vikarabad District and not to disposs€s his cultivating land and not to threaten to hand over the le t ircumstances stated t may be pleased to peaceful possession Sy. No.1 70/41/6, and ed at Kankal Village ; the Petitioner f rom I to the Respond ent Nos.7 to 10, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to6: SRI L. RAVINDER tGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 7to10: SRI MATURI MUt IHY MAAN The Court made the following: ORDER &E:. THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRJT PETITION No.15893 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is hled under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief/s:- "... Lo issue order or direcrioo more particularly onc in thc nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondenr Nos.s & 6 in interfering into the peaceful possession of the Petitroner from his land ro an extent of Ac.1-04 gts. rn Sy.No.I7O/A1/6, and to an exLcnt ot Ac.8-37 gts. in Sy.No-169/AA, which is situated ar Kankal Village of Poduru Mandal, Vikarabad District and trying to dispossess the petitioner from his cultivating Iand and threatcning to hand over the land of the petitioner to the Respondent Nos.7 to 10 wiLhout issuil-lg any notrce and without following the due proccss of larv, is illegal, arbitrary, unconstlrutional and violation of Articles I4, 15, 2I and 300,A of Constitution of India and also violation of Princrples of Natural Justrce and consequentl! direcr the Respondcnt Nos. 5 & 6 not to interfe.e into the peaceful posscssion of the Pelirioner from his Iand to an extent of Ac.1 04 gts. in Sy.No.17OlAl/6, and to an extent of Ac.8 37 gts. in Sy.No,169/AA, which is situated ar Kankal Village of poduru Mandal, Vikarabad Distr-icr ancl not to dispossess rhe Petittoner from hls cultivating land and not to thrcaten to hand over thc land to the Respondent Nos.7 to lO, pending and pass such oLher order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem lit and proper in the circumstances of the case..."

2. Heard Mr.Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. L. Ravinder, learned Assistarrt Government Pleader representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue appeadng for respondent Nos. 1 to 6 a-nd Mr.Maturi Murthy Maan, learned counsel representing respondent Nos.7 to 9 Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent authorities are trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land without following the procedure I I I , 2 contemplated under law. The-refore, he s€ :ks to pass appropriate orders.

4. Learned Assistant Government p162dr: - for Revenue contends that in the event of the respon<1': rt authorities intend to dispossess the petitioner from the slt ject property, they shal1 fo11ow due process of law.

5. Having regard to the submissions of bc 1 r the learned counsel and on perusal of the material avarllr rle on record, this Court, without making any observa.l ons on the possession of the petitioner, is inclined r direct the respondent authorities to strictly follow t le procedure contemplated under law, by issuing notices to he petitioner ald affording him sufficient opportunity of lr :aring, in the event they intend to dispossess the subject pror :rty,

6. With the above direction, this Writ Petiti n is disposed of. No costs Miscellaneous petitions pending, if anl shall stand closed. Note: That the 6th line and 76 line of Paragraph No. l; dated 16/10/2025 in W.P.No. 15893 of 2025 is read as notices to the interested parties and affording th,: opportunity of hearing" and is corrected and subst I issuing notices to the petitioner and affording hi opportunity of hearing"as per the orders of the Hon'ble dated 2210112026 in lA No.2 of 2025 This amended order shall substitute the earlier oni already been dispatched on 30/10/2025. sD/-A.V.S. PRASAD I 'EPUTY REGISTRAR :f the order by issuing r sufficient rted as "by r sufficient court order r which has F:i ";-':-'t:'=--."-- -:= -"-wI I t :)- To, SD/-A.V.S. PRASAD DEPUTY REGISTRAR /:(? SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// Secretariat, T.S.,Hyderabad. 1 . The Principal. Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, 2. The Commissioner, C.C.L.A., Telangana, Hyderabad. 3. The Distfict Collector, Vikarabad, V;karabad District. 4. The ReGri$e Divisional Officer, Vikarabad Division, Vikarabad District. 5. The Tahsilddr, Puduru lvlandal, Vikarabad District. .- ^ 6. .The Mandal Survevor, Puduru Mandal, Vikarabad District. '.-'z.,ffnA Cc ro Sht. RAPoLU BHASKAR, Advocare [oPUc] Hyderabad{$UT}

8. Two CCs ts €P FOR REVENUE,High Court for the State of Telangana at 9. One CC to SRl. MATURI MURTHY MAAN, Advocate [OPUC] 10.Two Cd Copies BM BS HIGH COURT DATED:1611012025 22t01t2026 I \ AMENDED ORDER WP.No.15893 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ( I t ,\ HE Sr47E 11tt8 ffi PAT t I c) .}. * i t