✦ High Court of India · 07 Apr 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 07 Apr 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
07 Apr 2025
Length
1,030 words

7 Bude Srikanth, S/o Suresh Aged Major, Rider of Motor Cycle Fl/o.H No 4-22' ffi;;"li;; W;Ar, winiriai vitiise and Mandal, District Kumarambheem Asifabad RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONERS :r == B. F.ude Suresh, S/o Chandu Aged Major, Owner of lV yjef#aft;a1, rii"Trioivinase and Mandar, o,,,;Bl?.p#1.?n/ooH No 4 22 ...RESPONDENTS/ Respondents 1 & 2 Counsel for the Appeilant: SRl. RAVTNDER REDDY S|NGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 to 6: RUDRESH DESHPANDE Counsel for the Respondent No. 7 & 8: SRI S. CHANDRASEKHAR Thiibourt made the following: ORDER -. ,. .i., , :, &i.', :1r-.: ,i1: ] r':.! r . : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA M.A.C.M.A.No.2838 of 2OL9 JUDGMENT: This appeal is frled by the New India Assurance Comparry Limited against the order dated 24.01.2019 passed by the Chairman Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum-III Additional District Judge, Asifabad in M.V.O.P.No.58 of 2018.

2. The matter was referred to the Lok-Adalat, and al Award dated O8.O3.2O25 has been passed in the Lok Ada-lat.

3. In that view of the matter, this appeal is disposed of in terms of the Award dated 08.03.2025. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPYII SD/-MOHD. ISMAIL D PUTY REG]STRAR t I To, SECTION OFFICER 1. The chairman, Motor Vehicres Accidents craims Tribunar-cum_ilr Additionar District Judge, Asifabad, Kr6a;;;ilXirabad District. ' 2..One CC to SRt. RAVTNDER REDDY StNGt.REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl .' 3t, one cC to SRt. nuodess DESHPANDE,;ondiite topucl 4. One CC to SRt. S. CHANDRASEKHAR 5. Two CD Copies , Advocate IOPUC] GK *u,, ,*x li(.1'-1.r.r..: i.l{-.rr.:.., HIGH COURT' '' DATED:0710412025 x- :1h.:\ \ JUDGEMENT , . ,:a-:? -r'j.'J i t . MACMA.No.2838 ot 2019 I irr€ S14 oB t 1 5 sEP 2025 :) \\ :) \o. (.r .:- . -- rti DISPOSING OF INTERNS AWARD PASSED BY - -- - ' :r:ir.ltbxaDAlAT. oF}THE|MACMA ,:s- :t,,. WITHOUT COSTS 8',w ' :. l' ,.... "'r':,: l:. :.-tl, . I.- ;; ...- .,.,ilr,fr*;ci', .-.;4s,;$:1 BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMAAITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Under Section l9 of the Legol Services Aulhorilies Act, I 987 (Centrol Act)] SL EE GP. H|GH COURT LOK AOALAT 1- = O I * Date:08-03-2025 Present:1. Hon'ble Sri Justice Narsing Rao Nandikonda, (Judge, Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman

2. Sri Md.Nazeeruddin Khan, Advocate, Member lvlACl{A. No. 2838 of 201 9 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) S1,te 1ol AGAINST O.P.No.58 of 2018 (on the fite of rhe (M.A.c.T) lll Addt. Districr Judge at Asifabad) Between: - The New lndia Assurance Company Limited, Rep by its Branch Manager, Branch Office at H.No.4-47-3-1, 2"d Ftoor, Beside Yamaha Show Room, Zafar Nagar, Bettampalty Road, Mancheriat, Tetangana. AND

1. Vadturi Rupa W/o tate Vadturi Ravi, Aged about 29 years, occ: Housewife. 2. Vadturi Rohith 5i o Late Vad[uri Ravi Aged about 'll years, Occ: Student Minor).

3. Vadturi Kapit S/o Late Vadluri Ravi Aged about 8 years, Occ: Student Minor).

4. Vadturi Tharabai W/o Vadluri Bapu Aged about 53 years, Occ: Housewife,

5. Vadluri Bapu, 5/o.Vadluri Lingaiah, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Agricutture, ...Appettant/ 3'd Respondent

6. Vadturi Kavitha, D/o. Vad[uri Bapu, Aged about 23 years, Occ: Household, (R2 & 3 are minors u/g of their natural mother i.e., Vadturi Rupa) (Att are R/o.H.No.1-49, SC Wada, Wanikidi Vittage R/M Wanikidi, Dist Kumarambheem Asifabad) .

7. Bude Srikanth S/o Suresh Aged Major, Rider of Motor Cycle R/o.H.No.4-22, Mandokar Wada, Winikidi Vittage & Mandal, District Kumarambheem Asifabad.

8. Bude Suresh S/o. Chandu Aged Major, Owner of Motor Cycte, R/o.H.No.4-22, Mandokar Wada, winilidf vittage & Manda[, Distr{ct Kumarambheem Asifabad. ...RESPONDENTSi PETITIONERS ...Respondents/ Respondents 1 & 2 I l AWARD A

1. This is an appeal fited by the Appeltant/ Insurance Company chattenging the order dated 24'01-2019 passed in op.No.58 0f 7018 by rhe (M.A.c.T) ,r Addt. District Judge at Asifabad.

2. Ms. U.Geetha, Regional Manager the authorized representative of Appetlant / lnsurance Company, has appeared and represented that the Insurance company decided not to pursue the present appeat and therefore they are withdrawing the appeat.

3. The said representation is recorded and the appeat is dismissed as withdrawn, confirming the judgment and decree of the Court/Tribunat betow. The amount, if any, remaining unpaid to the ctaimant(s) shatt be deposited by the Insurance company within one month from the date of receipt of the award, along with interest. Tribunat/MACT. 4' On such deposit, the Respondent/ctaimant (s) is/are permitted to withdraw his/her/their respective amount/s as per the award passed by the 5' ln case, the parties subsequent[y come to know about fi[ing of cross appea[/cross objection, they are given tiberty to seek recatt of this Order/Awai-d.

6. Court fee paid on this appeat shatt be refunded. 7. No costs. p.r Rq io.l-he lle,I/ EEqr eeq}}ar .b. fi.r e Co. Ltd- s a ,ti'iarqa Frfi..Edr, /ql?dlrRr Appei'i5'ntffa RgED6-i{8Bi1T/ lnsurance Com an N i- Sfr,- -6drv P,;SH CCURT r-uii AD,ALAT .a t * * .Sta le ol1 (Sea[ of the Committee) BER

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments