Smt. Darla Parvathi v. Jeedimetla (Hyderabad) RR District

The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus declaring the alleged inaction of respondents 1 to 3 in taking action on the complaint given by the petitioner as arbitrary and illegal. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that the petitioner is the wife of one Darla Sambasiva Rao. O n 12-02-2004, the husband of the petitioner went to Market for purchase of vegetables at about 9.00 p.m., and thereafter, he did not turn back. Subsequently, on enquiry, the petitioner and her family members came to know that her husband met with an accident near Telangana Spinning Mills and that the fourth respondent who was driving the motorcycle bearing No.APL 7379 was the culprit. Immediately, they lodged a complaint with the first respondent- Station House Officer, Jeedimetla, which was registered as a man missing case in Cr.No.77 of 2004. Subsequently, a dead body was found in a decomposed condition, and the same was identified as that of petitioner’s husband.

Since the Post-Mortem report revealed that the husband of the petitioner died due to the accident, the petitioner suspected that the fourth respondent with the help of the fifth respondent who is a Doctor and others, have thrown the dead body of petitioner’s husband in the backside sump of Usha Factory Balanagar. The petitioner states that on enquiry they came to know that after the accident, the 4th respondent took her husband to one of the nearest clinic by name “Jai Sai Clinic” run by the 5th respondent. However, the respondents 1 and 2 failed to take any action against the fourth respondent and trying to drag on the matter, though prima facie material has been placed before them to show that the fourth respondent was involved in the offence. Hence the present writ petition. The Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Jeedimetla, who is the first respondent filed a counter-affidavit denying all the allegations made by the petitioner.

He stated that on the basis of the complaint given by the son of petitioner, Cr.No.77 of 2004 was registered in Jeedimetla Police Station as Man Missing. During the course of investigation, it was found that one Muneeruddin working as teacher approached Dr.Kammari Brahmaiah for treatment of the husband of the petitioner. The said doctor stated that the husband of the petitioner was found to be in good health and there was no need to give any treatment. It is also stated that during the investigation, one unknown body was found in P.S.Balanagar limits near Usha Factory, Balanagar, which is the subject matter of Cr.No.60 of 2004. Subsequently, the body came to be identified as that of missing man in Cr.No.77 of 2004 of PS Jeedimetla. Thereafter, the Balanagar Police altered the same to Section 302 IPC on receipt of Post-Mortem report. However, after completing the investigation, the Balanagar Police altered the provision of law from Section 302 IPC to Section 304(A) IPC as the petitioner and others revealed the facts which lead to missing of husband of the petitioner and forwarded CD file to the Jeedimetla Police, and the same is under investigation with Jeedimetla Police.

2 CD copies