High Court · 2025

43. Smt. Sunita Soni s/o Suhil Kumar Soni, aged 31 Years

44. Srinivasa Rao G s/o APPanna, aged 32 Years

45. Devideni Lotti s/o Tata Rao Lotti. aged 28 Years

46. Subal Chandra Basumata s/o Late Punaram Sasumata, aged 44 years

47. Saniit Kumar Deb s/o Late Chlntaharan Deb, aged 48 years

48. Soma Das s/o Late Heralal Das, aged 35 Years 49, Auran Kumar ToPPo s/o Yakub ToPPa, aged 29 Years

50. T.Chandra sektlaran s/o L.Thirunavkarsa, aged 58 Years

51. K.Prabhakaran, s/o M.N.Nambiar, aged 58 Years

52. Rm Dhani, s/o Sampath, aged 56 Years 53- R.K C.B Mishra Mishra, agred 54 Y€ars l. l9 L€

54. Ramrup Sharma s/o Late B.N.Sharma, aged 53 years

55. K. N. Singh s/o Late S.p.Singh, aged 55 years 56. Kanchhid Singh s/o Late Teja Singh, aged Sg years

57. Jeewanand s/o Late Shri lagguram, aged 50 years

58. D.V. Bhaskar s/o Late Nagabhushanam, aged 4g years

59. N. Shanmugavel s/o Late. N.L. Narayan. aged 51 years

60. Sarawan Singh s/o Late t'4ala Ram aged 49 years

61. Rishal singh s/o Shishram, aged 43 years

62. thoop Sing h s/o Patram Singh, aged 46 years

63. A. R. Dhurve s/o Sokha Dhurve,4B years

64. Onkarnath Sing h s/o Lalan Singh, 48 years

65. Prafu lla Kumar-fripa s/o Late Dukhi Shayan Tripa, aged 48 years

66. R.K Behe ra s/o B N.Behera, aged 59 years

67. K.)alaja s/o Koteswara Rao, 44 years

68. Seeta I,4andrah s/o Hari Ram [4adrar, aged 26 years

69. N.Radha Devi s/o Gangom Kulla Singh, sged 2g years

70. T.P.Bhurr s/o G.Bauri, aged 57 years

71. T. P.Tudu s/o Lare t"1.C.TJdu, aged 55 years

72. Ravindra Kuma r s/o Ram Bachan, aged 34 years i I I I I I I I I I I t i J J I V 1 73, Gian Chand s/o Shri Hakum Ram Saini, 48 Y€ars 74 Taoan Kumar Chotldhury rto r-ut" Sothis Choudhury, aged 57 years 20 L^3

75. Bisweswar Debnath rl" Lui. Ram Chandra Debnath, aged 49 years

76. Keshraj Singh s/o LaEe Dovat Singh, aged 49 Years is care of i Address of the p€titioner i;;;"i;;, seshanna, s/o u' venkata subbanna i'"lJ con.tuur", CISF Unit: Rajeev Gandhi Int"initionur Airport, r/o E'No'sB/o2 Floor ,-^^- rii, ciiin"*, a6t, snamshabad, Hvderabad s0o0s And

1. Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) Headquarters South Zone, Ba sa nth nag a r, Chennai, n"pr"r"nt6o by its Deputy Inspector Gefleral

2. The Senior Commandant Central Industrial Security For€e Unit Raiiv Gandhi International Airport Ltd Shamshabad, Post Mamidipalli Via: Keshavagiri, HYderabad 500005 ., Petitioners Respondents PetitionunderArtic,le22$oflheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ particularly one in the nature of writ of lr/landamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the ndents in not extending the Transport Allowance to the petitioners as per Services (Revised pay) Rules' 2008 is illegal' arbitrary' being violation of articte 14 and 16 of Constitution of lndia and the respondents to extend the Transport Allowance together wance to the petitioners for the period from 1-9-2008 onwards rs and other benefits to which they are entitled ' the Central Civil discriminatory and consequetly direct with Dearness Allo together with arrea V f) l.A. NO: 2 OF 2011(WPMP . NO: 6962 OF 2011) Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed n support of the petition, the High court may be pleased direct the respondents to extend the Transport Allowance together with D.A that being extend to Sri Amarkanth Mishra (CISF NO 814450031 ), Sub-lnspector/E, C|SF Unit RGl, Shamshabad, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioners : SMT.K.UDAYA SRI counserrortheRespon'""''35'rtH'tff "Jlt'"=5?S^ftr?^?t, The Court made the following: ORDER i1 i I I HOIT'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI{A WRIT PETITION No.56O 1 0F 2011 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed declaring the action of the respondents in not extending the Transport Allowance to the petitioners as per the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules'

2. When the matter was taken up for consideration' Mr' K.L.N.Raghavendra Reddy, learned counsel for Respondent Nos' 7 and 2, submitted that Contempt Case No' 1458 of 2O I 1 was hled for non-compliance with the interim order dated O8.O3.2O11 in W.P'M.P.No.6962 of 2O11 in W'P' No' 56Ol ol 2Ol I- He further submitted that, in view of compliance with the said interim order, the contempt case was closed. Accordingly, in vieu' of such compliance, no further orders are reqr'rired to be passed in this writ Petition. 3 Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is closed No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed /TTRUE COPY,, iRrt$'t#[ S CTION OFFICER To, ,1 2 sr:"ffi i.r.saiou..gi.;*NDRAREDDY'scFoRcENrRAL

3. Two CD Coples- 4 HIGH COURT DATED:11lO7l2O2S I ORDER WP.No.5601 ol2Afi ) 2 4 i[P lill5 * o CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 6C'6.4 Yt- i(dae