The High Court · 2025

21. R.Anusuja, W/o. Sri Sai Ram, Occ Vegetable Vendor, Vo. Vikarabad Village and Town, Ranga Reddy District.

22.Yerclla Sayamma, Wo. Sayanna, Occ Vegetable Ve rdor, Rl/o. Vikarabad Village and Town, Ranga Reddy District.

23. Mafari Shivaiah, S/o. Venganna, Occ Vegetable V: tdor, Fi/o. Vikarabad Village and Town, Ranga Reddy District.

24. Ir/d.Khaleel, S/o. Pashmiya, Occ Vegetable Vendor, F /o. Vikarabad Village and Town, Ranga Reddy District.

25.Akula Ramulu, S/o. Adivaiah, Occ Vegetable Vendor, l'Jo. Vikarabad Village and Town. Ranga Reddy District.

26.Syed Ameeanabee, Wo. Nayeem, Occ Vegetable Vr ndor, R/o. Vikarabad . Village and Town, Ranga Reddy District. 27 .Palle Ananti, S/o. Chandraiah, Occ Vegetable Vendor, Vo. Vikarabad Village and Town, Ranga Reddy District.

28.Bajaar Narsimlu, S/o- Buchaiah, Occ Vegetable V,-' rdor, Rl/o. Vikarabad Village and Town, Ranga Reddy District.

29. Jollu Narsimulu, S/o. Sailu, Occ Vegetable Vendor, F /o. Vikarabad Village and Town, Ranga Reddy District.

30.G.Shiva Kumar, S/o. Laxman, Occ Vegetable Vendor, lVo. Vikarabad Village and Town, Ranga Reddy District. ...PEflTrONER(S) AND 1 2 3 4 The State of Telangana, Rep. By its Principal Secreta4', Administration and Urban Development Department, S,.' Municipal :retariat, Hyderabad The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikarabad, Ranga Rec( y District The Vikarabad Municipality, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy t) Commissioner itrict, Rep. by its The Station House Officer, Vikarabad Police Station, Vik Reddy District. lrabad, Ranga Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lnc i r praying that in lhe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be .,.RESPONDENTS I I I I I l , l I pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in trying to dispossess the petitioners from their respective places in front of the shops situated at Vegetable Market, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, violative of Articbs 14 and 19(1Xg) of th€ Constitution of lndia and contrary to the provis'rons conternplated under Municipalities and violative of Principles of Natural Justice. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO:19276 OF 20151 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from their respective places in front of the shops situated at Vegetable Market, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI KOPPUI-A GOPAL Counsel forthe Respondents 1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No 3: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY (SC FOR GHMC Counsel forthe Respondent No 4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI ITARAII J{A ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.14825 of i ols ORDER: This writ petition is frled seeking following : elief: "_...declaring the action of the respondent; herein in tryinB to dispossess the petitioner I from their respective places in front of th,: shops situated at Vegetable Market, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, violative of Article:r 14 and 19 (l) (g) of the Constitution of InditL and contrary to the provisions contempLate(i under Municipalities".

2. Sri Koppula Gopal, learned counsel for tjr Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel ) petitioners and Sri for respondent No.3 are present.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners \ petitioners :rre running vegetable market ar livelihood; that government has constructed /ould submit that d eking out their- ,hops under Nehru Rojgar Yojana for vegetable vendors and allotted t petitioners are rurnning business from the allo i are being paid regularly by the petitioners. He i that u,hile rhe matter stood thus, on 1S.OS.2C: r the petitioners and ed shops and rents ould further submit 5, respondent No.3 along rvith rcspondent Nos.2 and 4 and their stat premises and threatened to dispossess the pe premises w,ithout any notice, without following dt prayed to allow the ,,vrit petition. cErme to the market :itioners from their e process arrd tt6us, { I 2

4. karned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3 would submit that previously the Municipality has contemplated a development plal with an intention to construct new blocks and requested the petitioner to vacate the premises temporarily with an assurance that shops will be allotted to the petitioners in the newly constructed block. He would further submit that proposed development plan has been put on hold and thus, apprehensions of the petitioners are misconceived and therefore, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. He would further submit that in case if respondents intend to proceed with the construction of new block, the respondents would follow due process.

5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the vegetable shops by the petitioners. It is made clear that in case, the respondents undertakes development and construction of new block, they shall follow due procedure contemplated under law and rehabilitate the petitioners. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand dismissed. SD/.P.C.SULEKHA DEVI As'st sr^vGlsrRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFTCER 1 The Principal Secretary, Municipal Admir stration. and Urban Development o'"i," rtl"" it, slrt" oit' jri ng"*, secretariat' Hyderabad The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikarabad' Ranga Reddy District --. 2 I I] To,

3. The commissioner, Vikarabad Municipality, vikarabad, llanga Reddy District, 4.TheStationHouseOfficer,VikarabadPoliceStation,Vir(rrabad,Ranga Reddy Oistncr.

5. One CC to SRI KOPPULA GOPAL Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY (SC FOR Gt{ /lc)' [oPUC] T.TwoCCstoGPFoRMCPLADMN.URBANDEV,HigI)ourtfortheStateof Telangana. [OUT]

8. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE 'High Hyderabad [OUT] Court forthe Sta e of Telangana at

9. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME 'High Hyderabad [OUT] Court for the State 'f Telangana at

10.Two CD CoPies Ol D.N HIGH COURT DATED:1 8l0gl2025 ORDER WP.No.14825 of 2015 tHE S 14 o O ;' 7 JAN 2026 * I :sr'^rc.t 'l-.-:-i r.) .4 1 I * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITI(IN WITHOUT COSTS 0l