Gunturu Ananda Rao v. The State of A.P
Case at a glance
- Bench
- G YETHIRAJULU
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 302
Judgment
Cause title
And The State of A.P., rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (Crime No.113/2006 of Station House Officer, Kolluru Police Station, Guntur District). Respondent/ Complainant COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER : SRI E.V. BHAGIRATHA RAO. COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT : THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Petition under Section 437 & 439 of Crl.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated therewith, the High Court will be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in P.R.C.NO.5 OF 2007
on the file of the II Additional Munsiff Magistrate, Tenali, pending committal and trial into the same. The Court made the following
ORDER:
The petitioner is the sole accused in PRC.No.5/2007 on the file of the learned II Addl. Munsif Magistrate, Tenali. The petitioner alleged to have killed his wife by stabbing her with a knife and thereby committed an offence U/S. 302, IPC. He was arrested on 23-10-2006. The police laid the charge sheet after completion of investigation since the petitioner is in jail for the last five months. I am inclined to enlarge him on bail. The petitioner is therefore enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- together with two sureties each in a like sum to the satisfaction of the II Addl. Munsif Magistrate, Tenali.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To KK
The III Addl. Sessions Judge, Guntur.
The II Addl. Munsif Magistrate, Tenali, Guntur District.
The Station House Officer, Kolluru Police Station, Guntur District 4. The Superintendent Sub Jail, Tenali, Guntur District.
Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyd (OUT)
One CC to Sri E.V.Bhagiratha Rao, Advocate (OPUC)
One Spare Copy. HIGH COURT DRGYRJ DT. 30-3-2007 BAIL ORDER CRL.P.NO. 1896 OF 2007 DIRECTION Drafted by: KK Drafted on: 30-3-2007 HIGH COURT DRGYRJ DT. 30-3-2007 BAIL ORDER CRL.P.NO. 1896 OF 2007 DIRECTION
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.