High Court · 2025

' 3[i"tl?F.flI;iilt:ifir5sg, bv.its pubric prosecutor, 2. Lakkapaka Krishna. S/ oe"o,5tioi,'rUi'H;i"#^?rffitli2;'5 nn"o about 28 years, occ Frower Hish court ror the Petition under Secti ... riespo r,t o e ru T/RES po N D E N T ;5fr :,1"f t1",Tffi ;:T"ri:it:'.gi.?,lfi liT.llifl'.li,li?,ilsT;f H:; rrc;,:,t"*jTif:f"*l1?:?ff ff l#? j,",1ffi ,s;:A:*,:l*fu ,i - I.A. NO:1 oF2025 Between: Lakkapaka Krishna, S/o par uecoration, R/o Rajeev -*il'3[il[':i.Aged about 28 years, occ Ftower ...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENT NO.2 I I AND 1 Sankineni Varun @ Varun Rao, S/o Venkateswar Rao' Aged ahout 31 years' 6l" ijrrin"tt, R/o-Krishna Colony, Suryapet' Palsa Malsoor Goud, S/o Anianeyulu, Aged about 37 years; Occ Business' R/o Sri Sri Nagar, SuryaPet' lilaheswaramSandeep.s/oJayachandra,.Agedabout3lyears,occ Business, RJo Yedula Gr:pi Krrshna Prasad S/o Thirupath.i.Rao ,Aged si,ialit. riio K.rda Kuda village Chivvemla Mandal' 'Ihirmalagiri village and manoal' about '22 years' Occ 2 3 4 RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS E The State of Tr-'langana, Rep , by its Public Prosecutor High Ccurt for the State of Telan(lana at HYderabad ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1 PetitionunderSection35g(6)ofBNSS'prayrngthatinthei]ircumstances stated i;ihe M,emorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High cogl maY io p,:rmit the petitioner herein to compound the U/sec 5'06 of IPC and ;;;l;r;; s"J. e?lOt.i;rrd 3 (2) (va) oif SC/ST (POA) Amend-ment Act' 20'lti and to quash in" oful.iJi"sr; in si.c.No.138 of 2019 on the fite of the Special s,:ssions Judge i"i dclsr Tria'i Case 's at Nalgonda, in the interest of iustice ' l.A. NO :2OF 2025 Petitionrrnde.Section35g(6)ofBNSS'prayhgthatinthe.:ircumstances stated in ihe Memo.andum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may #;1";;J1" ,rro" tn" Crl.P.No. 4287 of 2022 and quash the proce-eding: in s.clNo. ise of 2019 on the file of the special sessions Judge for sc/sT Trial Cases at Nalgonda, in the interest of justice' t.A. NO:1OF 2022 petition unde r Section 482 of cr.P.c praying that in the circumstances 'in ine Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the H igh Court ma-y stateo iJ.r.r."O to stav all further proceedings against the Petitioners/A':cused Nos' 1' tea of 2019 onlhe fite of the Learned Special Sessions ;. 5;ili. Judge for SC/ST Trial Cases at Nalgonda' -S:.'tto This Pelition coming on for hearing' upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of siri K shrikanth, Advocate for the F'etitioners and the Asst. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent N,:.1 e nd of sri Rohith Kumar Sattu, Advocate for thre Respondent No.2. The Court macle the following: ORDER / HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI [.A.Nos.l and2 of 2 025 in/and CRIMINAL PE TITION No.4287 of 2022 COMMON ORDE R: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.l,4,5 and 7 to quash the proceedings against them in S.C.No.l38 of 2019 on the file of learned Special Sessions Judge lor SC/ST 'frial Cases at Nalgonda, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 507 ofIpC, Section 3(l)(r) G) & 3 (2) (va) of SC/STs (pOA) Amendment Act, 2015.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as wcll as the respondent No.2, that during pendency o I the pre sent Criminal petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly,, I.A.Nos.l and 2 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. Vide order dated 16.04.2025, this Court directed the I parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the SecreLary, tligh Court Legal Services Committee, High Court Y for the Stat:: of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identifica.tic'n and to submit a repofi

4. f'ursuant to the above said direction issued by thLs Courl, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, Ftigli Corrrt l,egal Servict:s C,rmmittee, has identified the parties ar.rd sutrmitted a report, dated 23.04.2025 and tlie same is placed on rectrrd-

5. In vieu of the above, I.A.Nos.l and 2 o1'l'.025 are alloweC. (l,lnsequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proce:dings against the petitioners/accused }lo:r.1, 4, 5 and 7 in S.C.No.138 of 2019 on the file of learrrecL Special Sessions Jtxlge for SCiST Trial Cases at Nalgonda, ale hereby quashed. l,4iscellaneous applications, if any penrling. sh,rll stand closed Sd,,- N. SRIHAR1 DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, '1. The Specral St:ssions Judge for SC/ST Trial Cases at Nalgonda'

2.TheStationHtluseofficer,suryapelllPoliceStation'Suryapr.:tDistrict. 3. One CC tt> Sri. K Shrikanth, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC tr: Sri. Rohith Kumar Sattu, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two ccs to the Public Prosecutor, High court for the state ol Telangana at Hyderabad. [C)tJT]

6. Two CD OoPies (Along with zr Copy of Joint Memo of Compromise) .:1,,:,gixir;:ffix&. ) I L AT B J t \ p,, " . ri.t \ HIGH COURT DATED: ?-910412025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.4287 ot 2022 o ? 1Et-/t', t\- .$' I .\N \$ i! l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 ARE ALLOWED. THE CRIMINAL PETITION IS ALLOWED l II / / t' ( I i I I I -7- + OINT MEM BY TH NER AND RESPON DENT N 2 1) It is submifted that the petitioners herein ntdJ tfre above Crt.p.No.42_87 or 2022 seeking to quash the proceedings in s.c.No. 138 of 2019 on the fire of the Special Sessions Judger for SC/ST Trial Cases at Nalgonda, which arose out of FIR No. 305/2018 dt. 24-It-2}tg of Suryapet police Statioin. Suryapet District, for the offence U/Sec. 506 of IpC and Sec. 3 (l)@(s)and 3 (2) (va) oif sc/sr (PoA) Amendment Act, 2015 and the said criminar petition is pending for adjudication 2) It is submitted that the petitioiners herein and the 2nd respondent are residing in suryapet rown only and in order to maintain cordial relatioinship all of them have decided to withdraw the above said case and in this connection at the intervention of the elders and the locality people the matter is amicabry and the 2nds respondent has agreed to withdraw the criminar case'L{nconditionaily. But arready the petitioners have filed the above criminar petition and the same is pending, as such the above criminar petition be allowed. .setfled In view of the above it is prayed that this Hon,ble Court may be pleased to record, the compromise and a ow the Crl.p.No. 4zg7 of 2o2z and \ -3- quash the t,roce,:dings in S.C,No. 138 of 2019 on the file of the Special Sessions Judger fcr SC/ST Trial Cases at Nalgonda, ifihe interest lf justice PET|IIONERS Q<> 1/ )O ( rn,Js-u-* {@ x--:::L-+ A, 8" (-/' (e,. L. lzrl s\^n.. - RESPONDENT NO.2 \l-!,\^)v-h Lll" COUNSEL FCIR PETMO rurRs" S, 0-r"L COUNSEL FOR RES.NO.2 L'