✦ High Court of India · 19 Nov 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 19 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
19 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,174 words

2. The District Collector, Gadwal At Jogulamba Gadwal, 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gadwal. 4. The Tahsildar, Gadwal Mandal, Gadwal District, Telangana State. 5. The Sub- Registrar, Registration Officer, Gadwal. 6. Sri Abdul Waf1b, S/o. Dade Ati, Age. B0yrs , Occ. Retd Emp, R/o. Shairati Street, Gadwal Town and Mandal. 7 o Jogulamba Plots Owners Welfare Association, Gadwal Town Sy No. 72211 and 7231R1 Represented by its General Secretary Chikka Chandra Sekhar S/o C. Narayana Aged 62 years, Occ business R/o Flat No.30B BlockAB 10 Samskruthi Township, Ghaikesar Medchal District, Telangana Lutqrcllg Class_ lV_Employees Association, Rep. by its president T. Madhuleti madhu S/o T. Naganna, aged about 52 yedrs, Occ Service Office at H.No. 137-1/3/RE 0008, Revenue Colony, Jogulamba, Gadwal District. Respondents Nos.7 and 8 are impleaded as per C.O. dt.06.10.2025 in lA. Nos. 1 and .3/2023 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue and appropriate writ, order or Direction more particularly one in Nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in ...RESPONDENTS ot considering and taking any action on the petitioners r€ f,resentation dated 211112022, 141312022, 311712021 , as illegal ,arbitrary, unrez { onable, violation of principles of Natural Justice, contrary to the provisions of re then Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 and als > the provisions of Telangana Rights in land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 2a2 ) apart from being violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lnd i and consequently direct the official respondents to consider the represenle tions and to take necessary action in the interest of Justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ L mstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nay be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to not to register the land in li r.No. 722 and 723 measuring an extent of Ac 4-31gts and Ac 6-03 gts respecti ely in the limits of Chenigonipally village of Gadwal Mandal to anybody pendir g dispossal of the above Wril Petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2023 Between: Jogulamba Plots Owners Welfare Association, Gadwal Town iY No. 72211 and 723lRl Represented by rts General Secretary Chikka Charr ra Sekhar S/o C. Narayana Aged 62 years, Occ business R/o Flat No.308 Block AB 10 Samskruthi Township, Ghatkesar Medchal District, Telangana ...PETITIONER/I' ROPOSED PARTY AND 1 The 4th Class Employees Gruha Niramana Colony, Rr: ' by its Secretary, Tayanna Ediga, O/o. H.No. 7-9-45, Nallakunta, Gadwal, , ogulamba Gadwal District. ...PETlTlONERYFIl :SPONDENT No.1 2. The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, R,: ,snru Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. The District Collector, Gadwal At Jogulamba Gadwal, 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gadwal. 5. The Tahsildar, Gadwal Mandal, Gadwal District, Telangana State. 6. The Sub- Registrar, Registration Officer, Gadwal. f 7. Sri Abdul Wahab, S/o. Dade Ali, Age. B0yrs , Occ. Retd Emp, Rl/o' Shairali Street, Gadwal Town and Mandal. Respondents Nos.7 and 8 are impleaded as Per C.O. dt.06.10.2025 in lA' Nos. 1 and 3/2023 ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or orders to vacate the orders dated.'13/06/2022 in l.A No.1/2022 in WP No.2309812022. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ANDE VISHALA Counsel for the Respondents No.1to5 : SMT.S.SRAVANTHI' . ASST.GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION Counsel for the Respondents No.6 : SRI SHAFATH AHMED KHAN Counsel for the Respondents No.7 : SRI K.B.RAMANNNA DORA Counsel forthe Respondents No.8: SRI A.NAJEEB KHAN Counsel for the Respondents No.9 : The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.Si,\RATH WRIT PETITION No.23O98 OF 20'.12 ORDER: 1 Heard the learned Counsel for tl e petitioner, Smt.S.Sravanrhi, learned Assistant Goverr:trent pleader for Revenue appearing for the ofhcial respondents, Sri Shafath Ahmed Khan, learned Cou: se1 lor the respondent No.6. Sri K.B.Ramanna Dora, leat ned Counsel for the respondent No.7 and Sri A.Najeeb I.. ran, learned Counsel for the respondent No.8. 2 The learned Counsel for the peti, oner would submit that the petitioner lilcd this ,r rit petition questioning the action of the respondent Nos.! to 5 in not considering the representations hled by the pe... tioner dated

37.O7.2021, 21.O1.2022 an 14.O3.2O22 1n rr: ;pect of the lands admeasuring to an extent of Ac.4.31 3-untas and Ac.6.03 guntas in Sy.Nos.722 and 723 .espectively, situated at Chenigonipally Viilage of Gadwal Mandal as arbitrary and illegal and sought a direc on to the ---1 respondent Nos.2 to 5 to consider the said representations filed by the petitioner. .) .) On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that the respondent authorities will dispose of the representations filed by the petitioner AS per law and requested to pass appropriate orders. 4 submits that Learned Counsel for the unofficial respondents a_lso representations of the petitioner can be disposed of, but requested to direct the respondent authorities to give an oPportunitlr to the unofficial respondents before disposing of the sarne

5. In view of the submissions made by the both sides, without going into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent No.2 to dispose of the representations f,rled by the pedtioner dated 31.O7.2021, 21.O1.2022 and 14.O3.2022, within eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. I i I I l_ J 5'KJ Miscellaneous applications, if any, pr: iding in this writ Petition sha-rl also stand crosed. No order as to costs //TRUE COPY// ;D/-C.DEEPIKA ASSIS TANT REGISTRAR G ;ECTION OFFICER To, '1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretari,t , Telangana State, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Gadwal At Jogulamba Gadwal, 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gadwal. 4. The Tahsildar, Gadwal Mandal, Gadwal District, Telangarr r State. 5. The Sub- Registrar, Registration Officer, Gadwal. 6 One CC to SRI ANDE VISHALA, Advocate. [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State rf Telangana

8. One CC to SRI SHAFATH AHMED KHAN, Advocate. [OF t IC] 9. One CC to SRI K B.RAMANNNA DORA, Advocate. [OPU( ] 10.One CC to SRI A.NAJEEB KHAN, Advocate. [OPUC] '1 1. Two CD Copies , BSK t.^ W I HIGH COURT DATED:1911112025 ORDER WP.No.23098 of 2022 ( I ) a t:. 0 tl\ - // 2' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS &,( 1'lz 9

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments