✦ High Court of India · 05 Feb 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 05 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
05 Feb 2025
Length
1,353 words

State of Telangana, rep by its public prosecutor' High Court of Telangana employee, R/o Hyderabad Guouloth Susheeta, D/o LalU. age,24 years. 9"9 I^,],?t" j.,i; 1 - 5 i6 s n a n tn i n a s a r t i iffi A?ft " ",, H Malkaigiri district Petition under Sectron 482 ol Cr'P C ptly]ng that in the circumstances of crimin^at-peiition the High Court mav be stated in the lVlemorand";i i;;;t oleased to quash tne proceli'nit'i" sc No 311'tzoi+ on the iile of Fast track Judge ror. t,trr ,no"x[;::ri'"; irilrno pocso Act cases at lvledchal agai;st tne fetit io ne rs/a ccused ;Bl:I J:Hfl , #"?::',t%"r'.i[1|, ,soeciat l.A. NO: f oF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr'P C praying that in th'e circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition' the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in S C No 31112024 on the file of Fast track Special Judge for trial and drsposal of Rape and POCSO Act cases at Medchal against the petitioners/accused ' includ ing the presence of the petitioners/accused pending disposal of the main criminal petition l' l : 1 I l l -v l.A. NO:20F 1024 Between S,%:t?'j":*;:E!;i}?lfi J#*l%:ei,,,",ffi ?:;,::,ilT; j,.:1,,;:li3;#%,!i)"i, .. -Petitioner/R r:spondent No. 2 AND 1 . Bhukya [;haslriclh; 2 Bhukya V iay;r W/o Shyam Singh, aged 50 ve nr"*,r.r"ii;]J;,;iiSl?r:irEn,fl tl l0-l')tiql BLrrharrpuram. Khammam airtii"itt :r_?,fl *;r,f #;;,::rf,:i:J#h j#gl"r:? occ Housewife, R/o H.No.

3. State of fr lan:ana uya"rutii tutt)"tkl' rep by its public prosecutor.}ligh court o,Telanqana ...Respondents/petitionerls No. 1 to 2 r, 'at J;. ffi H: H : .i,.".,,,1,,",1':':J IJ i?:, T'JI"J ^',1,- c,,i,,ii 8.i,,il,1' ln" uigh co,,r ;"ay"i;'i;.::j:"rJi'J;liir$"fff:?,i:.: "r the respondenrs Nr 1 ano z. rrerein;;J;;;'N,;",compotrnd tlre offence with to- 4 and to quash the proceedings in S c r,lr> tti J ,;ii'll'i:I:":,_Y1 . : :: i: i,l l,l;lil i; o JJ',,ff i : i i ;E ;i.J,y,:,,fl : "*: ;:.,:,: i i,. " ",, " r r! r, r; Ily g i . "' "; "r,r"* I.A. No:3OF 202,1 petition L,ci-'r 'S:ction.52B R/w section 35g(6) of BNSS pray ng that in the crrcumstances starrcr 'r lhe Memorand;;iil;;[r of uourt may be ple ase c, ro record r" .criminar e":ition tt*'n,gh quast the proceedings against the quasn re*oner^No l *,a)i iirir,t"o"*,, and 2 in S c No. 311 ot "orproiljrJ. ,and 2024 in cRLp N'tl 67t)t o1^",o ", iL-iir" "ii'"lt Track speciar Judse for trrar and disposal of rap: anrl pOCSO n.t.rr..l il;;j, This petition corring on for hearing, upon perusing the l\rrerrorandum of Grounds of Crim,n ll t):tition and upon l"rring the arguments ol Sri G Ravi chandra sekhar, i\c vo.;rie for the petition"r. ,ni,r," Additionar pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Rer;porcent No. 1 and of sri pura Rao yerankr, Adv,cate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made thr foll,cwing: ORDER i HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A .N os.2 3ot2 024 cRl MI NA LP ET 76{o l2 024 o.6 coMM ON OR DE R: by the petitioners/accused This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr'P'C' Nos l and 2 to quash the proceedings against them in S'C' No'31 1 ol 2Q24 on the file of Fast Track Special Judge for Trial and Disposal of Rape and POCSO Act Cases at Medchal' registered for the offences punishable under Sections a17 ' 376(2)(n)' 493 r/w 109 of IPC' lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the 2 petitioners as well as the respondent No'2' that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition' the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly' lA'Nos'2 and 3 of 2024 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound I I the offences 3 Vide order dated 28 01'2025' this Court directed the parties to appear before the along with their respective counsel Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee' High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad' for identiflcation and to submit a rePort \ I , I 2

4. I)ursuant to the above said direction issi tssued by this court, -'ared and the secretary' High court lsgsl ras identified the parties and srlbmitted a the parlies have appearea ,J;^"'"^:turt servicer; c()mmittee, report, oatec 31 .01 .z)2land the same is placed on record. 5. ln vievv of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 aretallowed. Consegu enti),, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedirgs against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 in S.C. No.311 oi 20;14 on the file of Fast Track Special Judge for Trial and Dispcsal of Rape and pOCSO Act Cases at Arledchal, are hereby quirshed. Misc :lla rreous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// /t Sd/. MOHD. ISMAIL IANT REGTSTRAR ASSIS ,o Secrroll oFFrcER J Hyderabad. r'C UTr

1. The xth Additjrnar A,4e-lroporrtan Magistrate court, cyberabad at tvledchar. 2. The station r-i.us. officer, .r"*rnri-rrgri potiJe'stafion, Rachakcnda District 3' Two ccs to prbrir; prosecutor, High c6urt for the state of rerangana at 4. The Secretary Hioh Court Legal Services Committee, High Court 3uildings, 5. One CC to Sri G tiavi Chandra Sekhar, Advocate tOpUCl 6. One CC to Sri PLrlla Rao yellanki, Advocate tOpUCl 7. Two CD Copies Hyderabad (Enclosed a copr7 of ' oint [Iemo) *W I l I I To, 7' --. '' a':1' t,t{}i-li''talt!':-' ,. : jqr.} 1* {:? HIGH COURT DATED:OSlO2/2t)25 ': {r1l .S 1.1 i( o^' ( n1 tPi 2il5 i s I o ('T .fr ,i coMMON oRDEF l.A. NoS 2 and 3 c:f 2O :24 IN/AND CRIMI NAL PETITI( N_ry O:676 lo F 2024 o ( t l.A. Nos. 2 AND 3 OF 2024 AND CRIMINAL PETITION ARE ALLOWED. v 3e I IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT I:TYDERABAD t+Ll Crl.P.No: "l 'OF 2023 Between:- r. Bhukva Shashidhar, S/o Shyam Singh, aeed z8 vears, occ: P\4' emPloYee' ii:,h'n'".i;illili' e'it''i'r;'a m' rGa mmam municipalitv' Ki\r.*urn urban, Khammam' .. r i l ). Bhu$a VijaYa, . W/o Shvam Singh, aged soyears, occ: housewife' Rl/o H.No. ro-73o/4/3, Burnan KLammam urban, Khammam' puram, Khammam municiPaiitY' .Petitioners/Accused No' 1to 2 AND c"''i r. The State of Telangana, Reo. bv its Public Prosecutor uiif, iourt fot tt e State olTelangana' Hyderabad. z. Gitguloth Susheeta, D/o Lalu, iJ"d z'o r"u.., o.c: Prilate emPloYec' -n"iJn-iu'"-l-iro,Shanthinagar,Firiaskafl a'. ;'ffi i;;;;;'"K"pra, Medchal Malkajsiri district ...Respondents/de facto comPlainant' It is submitted that the respondent No'z herein fiIed a complaint before the police, PS Kushaigutla vide FIR No' zoz/zoz3 fi1ed under. sections 4r7' SZ6(z)(n), +gZrlw ro9 IPC against thc petitioners herein who are the accused No. 1 to 2 in the above mentioned crime' It is submitted that the police filed a chargesheet in this case and the matter was numbered as S'C No' 3t of zoz4 on the file of Fast Track special Judge for trial and disposai of rape and PoCSo Act cases, Medchat. It iS submitted t}rat during the penilency of the S.C. proceedings, upon the intewention of the well wishers' elders' relatives and common friends, the petitioners and the respondent No'z have compromised the matter outside the Court and settled their dispute' It is also submitted that in pursuance of their compromise the petitioners and the

6.az*os /,.' I Jtfr -j l I fes )on(10n1 elfc rt. r\o-z have also filed affidavits before dris l{on.b1 e Court to that t' Irr r.ier.v of the above pr.v rd tjr.t this Hon,bre quils I llr,' plucecdings in S.c. Ju(18,. ror ri,rr and disposar,)l^-'" as t[:e peritioners u." / -'' Prsirs('o tUrccord Ihn, ".Jt;|;:;|:::"and, ut"or, u'a pocso a.t.u;,;;::ffiirtffil ",,,n:,;;""";;,'tnpromise circuarstancts. it is therefore "on"".n"ll1o.l d in the inlerest ofJuslice' &.-, pxi.#i.ro, o".,"{#frdF .6"i,3;*fl! 't s' ^ L{'/lY^' ! our)s,,ls for the petitioners Corrr"t fo.ad espondcnt \o.z

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments