The High Court · 2025

1 1 . Samathhapuri Srinivas, S/o. Late Venkatnarsaiah, aged 61 years, Occ.Retd. Teacher, F/o.H.No.1-5415/1 , Manasa Nagar, Near Hi-tech Bus Stand, Suryapet Town and District.

12. Samanthapuri Murali, S/o. Late Vekatanarsaiah, age 54 years, Occ.Teacher, Rl/o. Jajireddygudem, presently Rl/o. H.No.B-2sl 12, A.V.M.E.M. School, Doctors Colony, Nakrekal Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District

13. Samanthapuri Madhu, S/o. Late Venkatanarsaiah, age 52 years, Occ.Govt. Employee, Ri/o. Jajireddygudem, presently Rl/o. H.No.3-1 2:921531, Sn Nivasam, Rocktown Colony, Mansoorabad, L. B. Nagar, *r0....rfi PS}O"DENTS Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in nature of WRIT OF IVANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondent No.4 to 7 in issuance of Common formal Order viz. Proceedings of respondent No.6 vide Endorsement No.B/938/2020 dated 16-11-2020, neither initiated any action, nor surveyed the total land in Sy.No.133, 134 and 135 of Jajireddygudem Village and Mandal, Suryapet District and corrected the entries in the Revenue Records and not conducted proper enquiry and investigation with respect to representations of the petitioner vide Proc.No.D111211l201B dt.12-06- 2020 with regard to the corrections of entries in the Revenue Records, Online records and not showing me as Pattedar in respect of my land an extent Ac.3- 21 Gts. (Dry land) in Sy.No.134/3 of Jajireddygudem Village and Mandal, Suryapet Nalgonda District, pursuant to his old Pattedar pass Book vide Patta No.83260 vide patta No.110 which was issued by respondent No.6 in his favour and another representation vide Proc.No. D11121212018, dt.12-Q6-2018 and 29-06-2020 in respect of removal of encroachment of land an extent Ac.l-34 Gts. comprising of four borewells in Sy.No.133 of Jajireddygudem Village and Mandal, Suryapet District of respondent No.8, who is none other than his paternal uncles son, as arbitrary, unjust, non- est, and against the principal of natural justice as well as infringement of rights guaranteed under Article 3004 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to 7 to consider the representations of the petitioner by conducting the proper enquiry by surveying the total land in Sy.No.133, 134 and 135 of Jajireddygudem Village and Mandal, Suryapet District by correcting the entries in the Revenue Records, Online Record and in new Pattedar Pass Book in respect of in.respect of his land an extent Ac.3-21 Gts. (Dry land) in Sy.No.134/3 of Jajireddygudem Village and Mandal, in accordance with entries as mentioned in my old pattedar pass Book vide Patta No.83260 vide patta No.'1 10 which was issued by respondent No.6 in, favour of the petitioner, and put the petitioner in possession in respect of land an extent Ac.1-34 Gts. comprising of four borewells in Sy.No.133 of Jajireddygudem Village by removing the encroachments of respondent No. 8,9 and 1 1 to 13 simultaneously by surveying the total lands in Sy.No.'133, 134 and'135 of Jajireddygudem Village and Mandal, Suryapet District making necessary corrections of entries in the Revenue Records, Online Computer entries and issue the new Pattedar Pass Book. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under section 1s'l cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 to 7 to conduct the proper enquiry in respect of petitioner's land as mentioned in his old pattedar pass Book vide patta No.83260 vide patta No.110 by making necessary corrections of entries in the Revenue Records, Pahanis, online computer entries and issue the new pattedar pass Book accordingly. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NAGESHWAR RAO PUJARI Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 7: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.8 TO 13: -- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.1889O of 2O2L ORDER: This pr:tition is coming for hearing since 202 1. On

30.06.2025, rn,hen the matter was called. there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the matter n,as directed to be listed under the caption ,,for Dismissal". 'Even today, when the rnatter is called, there is no representation. It seems that the petrtioner is not intcrcstcd to prosecute this case.

2. r\ccordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution/ciefault. No order as to costs.

3. Pending miscellzrneous applications, if any, in this Writ Petitiorr shail also stand closed. SOI- AUTUEO ABDULLA KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC OFFICER One CC to SRI NAGESHWAR RAO PUJARI,Advocate [OP-U-C] i*o CCr to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies To 1 2 J PSK. PVL t#-. HIGH COURT DATED:2310712025 -t ORDER WP.No.18890 of 2021 2 0 SiP 2y5 \, \'..''' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION/DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS * 6 t8 l?-(