✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

M/s. S.Sultan &Co. M/s.Sultan Transport (P)Ltd v. Cement Corporation of India Limited, (A Government of India

Criminal Petition No. 126 of 2004T SURYA RAO

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Enterprises) rep.by its Regional Manager, state of A.P. Sri Rajarathnam M. S/o Sri M. Kondaiah R/o Kukatpally, Hyderabad under power of Attorney executed by the Executive Director, N.C.Jain

2.

State of Andhra Pradesh, through its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad Respondents Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying the High Court to quash CC.No. 537of 2000 on the file of the XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, City criminal Courts at Nampally, Hyderabad. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed herein and upon perusing the order of the High Court dated 5-4-2004, 19-4-2004, 30-4-2004 & 17-06-2004 and made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. D.Hanumantha Rao, Advocate for the petitioners and of M/s. P. Nageswarasree, Advocate for the Respondent No.1, and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the respondent No.2. The court made the following order: “Post on 27-07-2004. Interim stay granted earlier is extended till then.” ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To

1.

The XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, City Criminal Courts at Nampally, Hyderabad

2. N.C. Jain, Executive Director, Power of Attorney of Sri Rajarathnam M. S/o Sri M.Kondaiah Regional Manager, State of A.P. Cement Corporation of India Limited, (A Government of India Enterprises) R/oKukatpally, Hyderabad

3.

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad(OUT)

4.

One Spare Copy BV Drafted by: KK Drafted on: 19-6-2004 HIGH COURT TCSRJ DATED: 17-6-2004 NOTE:POST ON 6-7-2004 ORDER CRL.P.NO. 126 OF 2004 EXTENDING THE INTERIM STAY

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Petition No. 126 of 2004). ← Search more judgments