High Court · 2025
Case Details
Acts & Sections
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ' order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 6 in not processing the application of the Petitioner to provide for 6 Domestic connections' total Domestic Contract Load of 1 OO00O watts' vide Reg No LTIr/2563301 13 to the petitioner, the Plot No'966, in Survey Nos.11/14' 11115' 11116' 11117 and 11118 and part of Survey No 11, admeasuring 300 sq yards' situated at Sri Swamy Ayyappa Co-op Society Ltd', Khanamet (V)' Serilingampally (M)' Ranga Reddv District, T.S., bounded by North Plot No'967' South' Plot No965' East30 Wide Road, West.Plot No.949., as illegal, null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct : i I I i I q::$. the respond€,iits 1) process the application and to release tre individual service connection wi:l'o.r- being influenced by the instructions cf th( r'th respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 202!:. Petitio. ur I :r Section 151 cPC praying that in the ci"crn.stances stated in the affidavit file,i r ;upport of the petition, the High court nray be pleased to direct the Respondr:nts I to 6 to process the application of the pet ti,ln,,rr to provide for 6 Domestic co'ne:;t'ons, total Domestic contract Load of r0()000 watts, vide Reg.No. LTN/il5ti:1, 10113 to the petrtioner, the plot No.966 ir Survey Nos.11114, 11115, 11116, 11 17 and 11118 and part of Survey No. 11. arJmeasuring 300 sq. yards, situat,rd :r Sri Swamy Ayyappa Co-op Society L d. Khanamet (V), serilingampally (r\/ ) Ranga Reddy District, T.s., bounded try N:rth.prot No.967, South.Plot Nc.96'r , East.30 Wide Road, West.plot No.949. Counsel for the Pe titioner: SMT. THAKUR ROOPA STNGH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR ENERGy counsel for the Flespondent Nos.2 To 6: sRr N.SREEDHAFT REDDy. sc FoR Counsel for the Flespondent No.7: SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDy. SC FOR TGSPDCL GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER I I I "t L THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK w.P .No.15593 of2025 ORDER: With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission 2 The writ petition is hled with the following prayer "To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 2 to 6 in not processing the application o[ the Petitioner to provide for 6 Domcstic connections, total Domestic Contract Loacl of t 00000 watts vide Reg.No.LTM25633O 1 13 to the petitioncr PIot No'966 in Survev Nos l 1/ 14' l1I15,11I16, lll17 and,l1/18 ard partofsurveyNo ll admeasuring 30O sq yards situated at Sri Swamy A1yappa Coop Socicty Ltd ' Khanamet (V)' Serilingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District, bounded by North: Plot No 967' South: Plot No 965, llast: 30 Wide Road, West: I)lot No 949 as illegal' null void, arbitrelry:rnd consequently clircct the rcspondents to process the application and to release tl-re inclividua'l service connection wrthout being influenced by the instructions of tl're Ttli respondent"'
3. Heard Smt.Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner' the learned Government Pleader for Dnergy for rcspondent No 1, the Iearned Standing counsel for TGSI']DCL Sri N.Srcedhar Reddy appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 6 and Sri G.Madhusudhan Rcdcly, learned Stalding Counsel for GHIVIC appearing for respondent No 7 and perused the record. \ 2
4. The 1e arnr, I counsel for the petitioner submi,-s th: r he petitioner has submitte:c :r I application through online on 3 4.2).'-t for providing additional rorrl I r the pctitioner's service connccti(,n. I.r:arned counsel further st:rt,rs , r : t the subject matter of this lvrit f,c i'ior r is squarely covered by 11rc r; rlcr- passcd by this Cour[ in W.l,.N,r.z.0r,r ( f 2025 dated
12.2.2025 a :cl , r: samc is not scriouslv disputcd by ti.c Lr:rrned Standrng Counsel for- -r,: , srpondent Corporation.
5. In vi<''r' r- the above and having regard :o r_h: facts and circumstanc.s ' 'Lhr: case and without going into merits )i tLe matter, the writ petltion ls .: L ,lrosed of, directing the respondent Nos. I ro 6 to consider and pass :Lppr-t,1 riatc orders on the application of the lelitioner dated
3.4.2025 s1r rc,l,. rr accordancc urith law, as cxperlit o r,;lv as possible, preferably rr. l l- ir I period of two wceks from thc date of r1t c:iJ,t of a copy of thrs ordcr. i\,. rr r; ,llLel thcreto, rnisccllancous applicaLir r-rs. rf an}., pending in this rvrit L'etil (. r stancl closed. /iTRUE COPY// SDr-K.3FlAVANl SWAMY ASSISiTATIT REGISTRAR \I SECTION OFFICER The Princ;ip:; Secretary Power and Energy Departrnent Sertretariat, Hyderabad, l)'ate of Telangana -500022. The Chairmar -cum-Managing Director, Telangana Stat: Srtulhern Power Distribut on (-),)mpany Limited, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajigud a. l.lyderabad. The Superrrnte ndrng Engineer, Telangana State Southern Fora,er Distribution Company l-ir-n ted, Vidyuth Soudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad. The Divisiona Engineer, Operation Kondapur TGSPDC L l-{yc1 The Ass:. Divisional Engineer, Operation Kondapur T G S t, trC L, Hyd The Ass stant Engineer, SE/OP/GHYD East AE OP Allaprr T{iSPDCL , HYD The Conrmisrs oner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corprralior, Serilinga rnpra I y Zone. One CC to ,c \lT. THAKUR ROOPA SINGH, Advocate [Ofrt]C Two CC:; to (lP FOR ENERGY, High Court for the State,)f T€,langana, at Hyderab:d. [()UT] One CC tc S c I N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDC _ t,)pucl one cc rc S = I G.IvADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GH[4i tOpU-C] Two CD Oof,ir.s To 1_
2. a 4 4 u 7 o I #- 10 11 12 PSK GJP IE[tE:rF- - - -. HIGH COURT DATED:11010612025 ORDER WP.No.155t)3 of 2025 CC TODAY n,- tr ,\I€ ()A v /:) .J 1t ,ir 2ifl5 7 Z i.. r') ..:.. :,.; a) " ...: DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT' C;()STS @^1 \3 lr^(,