V.Prakash v. 1. The Commissioner and 1.G

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to iSsue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not conducting enquiry into the matter and in not canceling the alleged partnership reconstitution Deed dated 22-01-2000 vide document No. 592i2010 with the Office of the 2nd respondent executed in favour of 3'd respondent inspite of representation of the petitioner dated 7-1-2013 is illegal, arbitrary, null and void and consequently direct the respondents to conduct the enquiry and cancel the alleged partnership reconstitution Deed dated 22-1-2OO0 vide document No. 5g2t2O1O with the office of the 2nd respondent executed in favour of the 3'd respondent forthwith t.A. NO: 10F 2 13 WPMP. NO: 16024 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be ileasecl to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to dispose of the representation of th,3 Petitioner dated 7- 1-2013 by directing the respondents to take action as per the Provisions of Registration Act, 1908 pending disposal of the main Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. YESHWANTH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR REVENUI: Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI KOWTURU PAVAN K{.JMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SREENIVASA RAO RAVULAPATI The Court made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE SITI JUSTICI] N.V.SI{RAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITTON No.I3040 of 2013 ORDEII lkrarcl lealned counsel for tht,' pr:titioncr anrJ learnc.l Assis[ant Govcrnrnr..nt Pleacler for Stamps and [ir:gistration appcaring [ot tespoudent No.1 an,.l 2. With thcirconscnt, this ttlit Pt'titiort is tlisPosctl ol 2- Iiris writ pctition is [ilecl scckirrli thr'l,rllorn,irtg Pla\/cr:- -l nntl 2 itt nol trttttlttcttttg cttrlrrinl inlo " tltt, irction of tle respondettts tlre nnller tnd u't rtot crrnceling tlr tLltgul lnrtrtrrslttl rtt'ttnsliltrliort Dctt{ rlaled 22,01.2000 t,irle dot trttrttrl No.5t)?./?.010 l,tllr tlu' ().!firt ol' tln' ?"r respondettt ext'ltted itt jti'ttttr ttl ,1"! rcsptttuk't tttsl.,tl( df rcprtscnlation of tl'te petitioner dnted i.1 )013 is illcgal, uhitnry, rtuLl nnd rcil nntl conseqtrcntlry direcl tha rcspotulctLts to rrtndtLt'.t tlu; cnquiry nnd cnucel the allcged pmtnersltip rctonsli t t r [iort l)ecd dtrLctl 22.1 .2000 t,idt rlocmtenl No.5922010 tpith lht ot'Jice of llrc )"t rcsportdent cxcct.rLcd in faoour of thc 3'.d resprtttdcttt forllttlilh."

3. Ilrir.f facts o[ this h,rit pctitior arr-' LI-rat th(' pctition('t aloni', with othcr' 5 pcrsons constitutccl a p;t t'tt-rt'rsl-ti1-r busitttlss urttltlr thc tlamc and style ol Sri Laxmi Walr:housin1l ancl Llrt' said partrrt'rship dctlcl was registcrtrd on 02.07.2007,1-raving cqual shart: at 1/6rl'cach..lherrt:a[Ler, a]l the partners have contributed respective sharc anci purchast'd larrt'l to an extent of Ac.3-12 cents, in Sy.No.479, situalcd at Laxmpuratn (V) Ilurgarnpad (ManclaJ) Khammam District ancl constructccl a g,oclowr-r (l-rcrein after rcferxrtl as subject propcltlr) ancl thc s(r)l('was 1;ii'ttrt Lrtt lcasc to thc t'l'C corrrp.r r\r. l,.rkrr, in tht-. rnonth ol .r\u1',usl, 2(X)9 all Ihc par-[nr:rs rnutually 2 dcciclcd to scli au ar' lhc subjcct Lrl.opcrtv anLl rcspolll,tnt No.4 bt,ing the managing parlirer e;<ccu reci ..g;rc('nr(]nt of sale in favour. oI rt-.spontlcnt No.3 ancl therealte' disputLrs a*rsc bcLwr'.n the par[ies a.c] thc. pctiti.;rcr on 26.()7 l()l'l r'-rrr'11 lor,,.rr ,rrLice [. icsi,r.tlcnt No.3 a.c] iils. [o rc,sp.nrlent No.-1. lrurLlr,,r t.;rsil ol llrt, ltctiliont,r is that the rc,sponclcnt lf ri. l by supprcssi.g, tlr. i.rcts crccutctl par'r^ership rcccu.rstitu r io. clcec[ antl by mislcadi.l' tlrt' r'r'riisrrati.. authorities, got regist.rccl the sa^re as Docur.rrcrrt N.,r92 .ri 2010 c{atcrr 22.0r.2000. ThereaLfter, peLiti.ner on

07.01.2013 ,r.rrle r.pr.st'rrtatio. ;Lrrrl requcsted rcspontle.t Nos.1 antl 2 to co.cluct t{r't;rilL'tl e.r1ui'r' i, th., uratLr-.r and ca,col thc par.r otr.ship rcconstitr,rlior: rjrt.il rl.rLi,ti ll.0l l(()(), horvcrrcL, thc satn<, s still pcn,-li:r11 for consrclcr.r I ri-r.. .ji11grit,r,.ri irr Ilrt,s.trrrt,, tiris writ prr:titicl. rs iiled.

4. flrc r.air ilric'ancc oI trrr: pctitioner is that t.rrc responde.t autlrolitics irai,in.l r-t'ccir t. lirr-'Pe titjlynl;1'-. repr.t_.scnta tion clated 07.01.2013 is not takinr; anr' .rctior.r ancl 1,.r':ri this Court to dirccl. thc resr:ondent auLhoritics lo consir.iil thc ;rr:titionur'' s represeJrtation claLt,:d 07.01.2013 and pass or,-lct s in I tir-ni. i.rcrunil frr'r.iotl. 5 i\ touirtt'l';s lilt.tl rrn b3ltatf oi respondellt No.2, rglcvalt ltrrr.ti6n is extracted hcrcun, lcr:- " l'lrrtt tlr rcltL.).llLtlto)t iutrd 01.0-1.2013 r.learly :;ltozos tlmt nl'tcr lr4t5t,o.t .) lytrtrs, tlrL; rortl lteLitioner is stekitig tc, conclut:t t.lctrtil trtrliLirry tt,illt t.conrrl lo tfic reconsLittLtioi tbed dnterl 22.0 L.)01() uluclt ;rri'. r(,gtstt,r.d tts document No.592,/2010. tt is lnuttblv strltntttttLl. tlttrt titc reItt:.l sotLght by tlLc zorit pr:titioner is -t lol .otrl(t plnh.d uttdcr llu: Prooisiotts o.[ l*:gislrntiott Atl trtrd rln' otrLry rtnrdy trtnilnblt is la rt1t1trL411lt Llr cttntpt'tt'rti titil aourl."

6. At this stagc, Icarned counsel lir' tlrc pt:titioncr sc:t:ks 1rt:rnrission of this (-orrrt to apprroach thc courpclcnl ('ivil (,orrlt

7. Iltrcordrng thc strbmission nrarlt: lrv the learnccl coulrst:l apg'arin11 or-r cithcl siLlc anrl t,ithout cxpressirlg an)r opil.ri()lr on thc merits o[ [he case, this rvrit pctitiorr is disposecl of r:na[.lrnll thc pctitiom:r kr sr:ck appropriate rer.nt,dr .rs availabkr ur.ttlcr lart B. \\rLth tht: above tiirections, lhis Wlit [r,.:tition is tlrsPoscc] of. Misct:ilant:ous .rprplications. if anr' pi:rrtiirrr,,, sirirll slancl closcri. No trriJc'r as to c()!;Ls. //TRUE COPY// / / / I SD/.V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REqSTRAR cr/ v SECTION OFFICER to'.,. ,n. commissioner, and 1.G., Stamps ang Registration, Nampally, Hyderabad' i. ii;; J"i;i 5;o-i"si.ii'i-il, (hammam' Khammam district' 5. o;;"ct'il s-ri rra.nesn*inth Kumar, Advocate toPUCl 4. Two CCs to GP tor. ii6'"nul, 'High-Court Hvderabad [OUTI ij'#'bCi;5; Ko'wturu Pavan Kumar, Advocate [oPUC] .-. 5'# 6d iI Sris-i"""irrsa Rio iivutipati' Advo'ate [oPUC] Two CD CoPies 5 u 7 for the State of Telangana' at \ TJ GJP $ I HIGH COURT DATE D : 1 810212025 ORDER WP.No.13040 of 20'13 1r' q o o t 11 RP; Trlir ) ot ry,, ,' '!' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 0Ot'gt' W