✦ High Court of India · 04 Jun 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 04 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
04 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,017 words

Counsel for the Petiti,:ners: SRI MOHD GULAM RASOOL Counsel for the Resp,cndent No.1 to 5: GP FOR HOME The Court made the f,rllowing: ORDER r-f I i I l I I i l I ; I l I I I I I :i I i I I i I \ \ THE HONO URABLE SRI JUSTIC E K.SARATH trTRIT PE.TITION No.L5,475 ol 2or25 ORDER: Heard Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and leamed Government pleader for Home appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to S. With the consent of the both sides, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

2. learned counsel for t1le petitioners submit that the petitioner Nos.2, 5 arrd 4 are accused Nos.l to 3 in Crime No.75 of 2O25 on the file of Doma police Station, Vikarabad District, dated 17.O4.2O2S registered for the offences under Sections 318(2), s18(4), 336(2),336(3) and 3ao(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (for brevity, tsNSJ and petitioner Nos.1 ard 3 are not arrayed as accused in the said crime and they are no way concerned with the said case and they have been intentionaliy dragged into the instant case.

3. Leamed counsel for the petitioners further submits that without issuing notice to the petitioners undei Section 41_A of IPC/Section 35 (3) of BNSS, 2023 in connection with Crime No.75 of 2025 on the file of Doma police Station, Vikarabad District, dated 17.O4.2O25, the respondent No.4_station House 2 Offrcer is celling the petitioners to the Police Staliorr time arrd again.

4. l-earr r d Government Pleader for Home sub ni: s that the ofhcial resp,rndents will follow due procedure as :o'rtemplated under Secl Lon 41-A of IPC/Section 35 (3) of the BNIS, 2023.

5. IrL v ew of the submissions made by the lx,th sides, the writ pelitio:r is disposed of directing the responrlent No.4- Station Hor,,.se Officer to issue notice to the petit ioners under Section 4l.rt of IPC/ Section 35 (3) of BNSS, 2023 n :onnection with Crim No.75 of 2025 on the {ile of Doma Poli,:e Station, Vikarzrbad t)istrict, dated 17.O4.2025. On receipt oI srrch notice, the petitic,ners are directed to respond to the s,,rid notice. Thereafl er. the respondents are directed to foliow cue procedure as per t-re ENSS, 2023 and the guidelines issued ty I he Hon'ble Supreme (lriurt in Arnesh Kumar o. Sta,te of .Bihrrrt . There shall be n(i ()rder as to costs. Misccl izLneous petitions, if ?nI,11e151irlg shali s tarrd closed. L^.. \ ^ ..., < y2 Klrlt+) N \>,r ,, /-> ' I/TRUE COPY// \ sD/_A. UAL|.|h.ARJUNA RAO ,\AES{STANTREG|STRAR l\ v sE:c'r'toNoFFtcER The Princioal secretary. Department of Horis. sec eti,rriat Buirdings Hyderabad, St;.t: of Telanqana. The Superintendent of poliie, Vikarabad district, Vikarabad The Deputy Sup.:rintendent o? porice, Vitiraoiii, Viil[oro oi.trt.t The Station Hoir,;e officer, ooma porice strtionl'oo,il'vit<ariu,io-oistrict. A.nand Kumar, 3ub rnspeitor or pbrice-ooma pbri-cie'Station D,rma Vikarabad district. One C^C^to SRt |\4OHD GULAM RASOOL, Advocate tOpUCl Two CCs t, GF) FoR sotrrte, Hrgh-c1i,ii'r- inS"strt-e',of rerangana at Hyderabad [OLrTl Two CD Copier; To,

2. 3. 4. 5.

6. 7. *t- e. BSR VACATIO N COURT HIGH COURT DATED:0410612025 ORDER WP.No.15475 af2025 z? f,- ^, =_=--\ ST 4irri Q :) () '9 0'i ,liN 2l][ a t ... .---i'r \i-: DISPOSING ,CF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS 4 6 t, 6 I I I I I I

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments