✦ High Court of India · 04 Jun 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 04 Jun 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
04 Jun 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,304 words

Petition under S ection '151 cpc praying that in the cirr;ums,tances stated in the affidavit file(l ir support of the petition, the High court rn;ry be pleased to t direct the Respondent No.4 not to accord sanction for building permission to the Respondent No.15 pending disposal of the main writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 1 to 14 to consider the Representation dated

28.04.2025 and not to interfere into the petitioner's Land by the Respondent No.15andpendingdisposalofthemainwritpetition. IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstanQes stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.4 not to allow the Respondents No.15 to 20 and their men to encroach in to the land pending disposal of the main writ petition' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VLADIMEER KHATOON Counsel forthe Respondents No. 1,6 & 14: SRt ANANTHULA RAVINDER, GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel forthe Respondents No.2,9 to 13: GP FOR REVENUE counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 7: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT counser ror the Respondent No.4 & 8: sRr tETibHirTrT,t"TSi.lIi=" Counsel forthe Respondent No.S: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.15 to 20: - The Court made the following: ORDER THE::ION'BLE SMT JUSTICE K'SUJANA .WIUT PETITI ON No.l 5457 of2o25 ORDER: The rvrit I,c I tion is l-rled seeking the following re lief: fo is-sir ? Q L nt. order or directiotl more particularLg one in n( tul e " o[ tpit al 111t1()ctnus declaing the in o:cttorr of the Responde.nl los 1 tL ls ,ir,,t xtr ; tlering the Representation dated 28 O4 20) t ttnC ti e petiioner Land bg the Respondent N-o 15 as 'Litgcl' interfere inr arbiirary a t,tr-' .from belng in uiolation of pinciples of nalurol trt<ti( e arul frtsi ti<,l.rtt,te r>f Articies 1a, 19(1)(g) and 21 oJ the CotLstltuti ttt )f India ancl c )ttsttluentlll consider the same ......" " Heard lert:led counsel for the petitioner; Sri A-ranthula 2. Ravinder, lear.r ecl liovernment Pleader for Social welfart .. ppearing for respondent lrtos.1, 6 & 14, and Sri Putta Krishna Rt'rrrly, learned Standing Couur';t'l ftr respondent No.4.

3. Learnr:cl ( c unsel for the petitioner submitt( c hat the petitioner comrlil t:e had made a representation date<l 28 04 2025 requesting rl: s )()n(lent No.4 not to accord building pe -rn ission to respondent No. 15 'r'ithout considering the objections of :l e retitioner anci the same i.l rct considered till date, as such requeste(i tlis court to direct the r,:r;IrorLdents to consider the said represe ntat i( 'n ' Il t Learned liranding Counsel for respondent No 4 subrnitted that,

4. as of today, n(l zrpolication has been hled by respondcnt I'{o' 1: seeking building pcrmi:;s ion, and if any such application is :iled, the I { -'*^-{ \ \l 2 5'(t-/ Il,il No 15157 of202j - authorities will accord permission to respondent No. 15 only after grvlng an opportunity to the petitioner

5. On considering the submissions made by both parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, it is observed that no application has been filed by respondent No. 15 as on date. However, in the event of respondent No. 15 filing any application seeking building permission, respondent No.4 is directed to consider the said application only after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and considering the objections, if any.

6. With the above direction, the writ petition There shall be no order as to costs. IS disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if anv pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII S A D/-P. PONNA KRISHNA SISTANT RE G SECTION OFFICER Gadwal District- ISSrIBIr,ssioner, Gadwat Municipality, Jousura One CC to SRI VLADIM EER KHATOON , Advocate loPUcI Two CCs to SRI ANANTHULA RAVIND ER, GP for Social Welfare, High Court for the Sta te of Telangana at Hyderabad. [ouTl Two CCs to GP for Reven ue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad touTl Two CCs to GP for Mun tcipal Administrati on and Urban Court for the State of Tel angana at Hyd One CC to SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, S.C for Two CCs to GP for pancha yat Ra and Rural Development, High Court for the State of Tela ngana at Hyde rabad tOUE Two CD rJ Municipalities IoPUC Development, High erabad. l To, , \ 2 3

6. 7.

8. MP M, I VACATION COURT HIGH COURT DATED:0410612025 ,/J/, -' t) (. ir \. : ..1 - .- i:ii, . ,..- ' i''-' t.' 'Cr Pz O I ii ,r::r tffi 1: * ORDER WP.No.15457 ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOI.JT COSTS \1 0A 7 -/ t.\ (:'

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments