1. Chakka Sai Subash Chandra Bose v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition unrrt;r [)ection 151 cpc praying that in the circurrsl ances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may, tre :reased to stay of demolition of fc ur r ecade ord residentiar houses of the petitio re -s in survey No 121113P, Bhadracraram pending orders in Revision vide coLA,s Ref No LU I 2826 40 41202 4 C ated 24t OSI 2O2S befo re the 5th Respo nd e nt Counsel for the Petiti')ner : SRI K.RAGHAVA CHARYULU Counsel for the Respondents: SR! E.RAMESH CHANDRA GOUD, GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: ORDER j THE HON,BLE SMT JUSTICE K.SUJANA WRIT PETITION No 15,428 of2O25 ORDER: The writ petition is hled seeking the following relief: "......to issue writ of Mandamus or ana other appropiate tont' order or directions declaing the disciminatiry approoch in the compensotion in the allotment of plots as well <ts. tn deckling tLe eligibte ou,,ners of the Responde'nti in Lnnd Acquisition proceedings ,r" ir*.y No.1"21/ 13P hhadrachaLan as at bitro1J' illeqal and 'ri"tii".-if anntes 14, 19 and 3ooA of the Constitution cf lndia and g;;"t";n rti.r rehef or reliefs as mag.. be deemed lt u?l'Ler the iircumstances in the interest of justice ' " -sa.nction

2. Heard Ms.Padmaja Gudiraju, learned counsel reprcsentlng Sri K.Raghavacharyulu, learned counsel lor the petitioners and Sri E.Ramesh Chandra Goud, Iearned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing on behalf of respondents' karned counsel for the pctilioncrs submits that the 3. petitioners are the owners and possessols of land in Sy-No l2lIl3P' Bhadrachalam. Learned counse[ requesrecl this Courl to direct t1-re respondent authorities not to dcmolistr the constructions on the subject land till passing of the orders in Revision vide CCLA's Ref.No.LU/28 26404 12024 pending before the sth respondent-the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Hyderabad, wherein the authorities have reserved the mattcr :r$'rriting a report from the 2"d respondent-the District Collector, Bhadla'-l;'i Kotha gudem' t I t \ 4 Lear-n :<l r iovernment Pleader submits th.rt th : \u,ard was passed or : (). )}.2025 and the same was commun Ca ted lo the petltioners, lL)\irrve r, they have not challenged th,-- si rid Award. Learned Go,,r( rnn)ent Pleader further undertakes that tlLe respondent aulhoritics r.r,' lr r.t tt demolish the subject constructions riit,ront giving the pctitione:rs ar r opportunit5z and due notice.

5. Takirrg into consideration the submission made I v he learned GovcrnmenI I)lerrrrler that the respondent authorities wil] nr t demolish the subject c( )rrsit -uctions without following due proccdure of law, the writ pctitroi-r ,. ,lisposed of. Further, respondent No.5 s lirected to pass apprc,prr.rtc orders at the earliest in the pe rrlirg rcvision petition.

6. Accord ing l , the writ petition is disposcd ,t l . No costs MiscellaneorLs l)( (irions, if any pending, shall stand closerl. sd/- P. \ //rRUE coPYtt \' ;! The Princif ,al liecretary Revenue Departmer\t j Telangana, l-yd ..rabad-500022 v To, 1 ,PADMANABHA REDDY \ DEPUI.Y REGISTRAR _ SECTION OFFICER TS Secleti rriat State of

2. The District r}r lector, Bhadradri Kothagudem District Kctha;ludem-s07101 , Telangana

3. The Reve nur: Divisional Officer, Bhadrachalam-lic 71 'l 1 Bhadradri Kothagudent Dii trict Telangana

4. The Tahsi dar, Bhadrachalam-S071 '1 1 Bhadradri Ko rar;udem District Telangana

5. The Chief ,lcrnmissioner of Land Administration, Nampe ily Station Road, Abids, Hyderaba d-50000'1 Telangana

6. One CC to I;RI II.RAGHAVA CHARYULU, Advocate. [OptJO] 7. Two CCs to C;F' lor Land Acquisition, High Court for the Stare of Telangana at Hyderabad [OIJ I-]

8. Two CD Cot;ir:s.. BSK MP E-- \.. - ..1 - I 1 HIGH COURT DATED:0410612025 VACATION COURT r \t- S l^'16 C;. ./,;, :. i It Jutr uE \i ta *r' o r<' ORDER WP.No.15428 of 2025 DISPOSING I)F THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS b