High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Notice No. 4/FRRO/HYD/LRy2023-1 196 d1.19.06.2023 issued by the 2nd respondent, as illegal, contrary to law, principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the Notice No.4/FRRO/HYD|LFJ2023-1'l 96 dt.1 9.06.2023 issued by the 2nd Respondent. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay all further proceeding s in pursuance of Notice No.4/FRRO,/HYD1LR|2023-1196 dt.19.06.2023 issue<l by the 2nd respondent against the writ petitioner. lA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under- c,rder Vl Rule '1 7 of CPC, under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstanc;es stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to amend the main prayer- and to add the words "and invalidation of Stay Visa dated 16.1 1.2022 on 07.06.2023 without any notice bv the 2nd respondent" to the main prayer. lA NO: 3 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in sr.rpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim ord,-.rs dated 28.06.2023 passed in W.P No. 1662612023 until fu rther orders lA NO: 5 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the add itiona I cocuments. lA NO: 4 OF 2023 Between:

1. The Union of lndla, Rep.by its Home Secretary, tVinistry of Home Affairs, North Block, Nevr Delhi-'1 10 001

2. The Foreigners Flegional Registration Officer and Civil Authority, Foreigners Regional Registration Officer, BOI, Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), GOl, SVP OCR Complex S;hamshabad, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT AND

1. Mr.Garyagdy Garlyyev, S/o.Yazmyrat Garlyyev, Aged about 26 yrs' occ. S(uoidt, No.1'o-1-18114138, oriposite Anh'a Toweis, First Floor, Shyam Nagar, Masabtank, Hyderabad- 500 004 ...RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER

2. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, West Zone, Hyderabad Commissionerate, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in W.P. No.'l6626 of 2023 daled 03-07 -2023, and dismiss the Writ Petition, in the interest of lustice. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI NADELLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: SMT. L. PRANATHI REDDY, REPRESENTING SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR (Dy. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDrA) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 and 4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER ! I I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENTVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.16626 OF 2o.23 ORDER: This t,rit petition is frled seeking the following relief ''. .. to isstrc a Writ, Order or Direction particularly one in rhe naltrre of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Notice No.4/FRRO/HYD/LRl2023-1196 ch.19.()6.2O23 issued by the 2nd respondent, as illegal, contra ry to lau,, principles of natural justice and violative of Art icl:s 14 and 2 1 of the Constitution of India and consequ-'ntlv to stay all further proceedings in pursu.rnce of lhc Notice No.4/FRRO/tlYD/LRl2023- I l96 rlt. 19.06.2023 issued by the 2"d Resprondent and to pass . . ..''

2. Ileeu-<l Sri N.Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for petitioner and Smt L.Pranathi Reddy, learned counsel representir)g learned Deputy Solicitor (ieneral of India, \ appearing orL behalf of respondent Nos. I and 2 and learnedl { Assistant Gtvernment Pieader for Home appearing for respondenl |los.3 and 4.

3. During the course of hearing, Iealned counsel for respondent \os.l and 2 submits that pursuant to the interim order dated O3.O7.2023 granted by this Court, the respondents considered the claim of the petitioner and petitioner rrl-eady left India on 29.12.2024. Hence, the cause in this writ petition does not survive 2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court that the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach this Court, whenever fresh cause arises and the sarne was not disputed by the learned counsel for respondents.

5. In view of the above said submissions, writ petition is closed, granting liberty as sought for. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.N. SRIHARI ASSIST T REGIS TION OFFICER One CC to Sri Nadella Venkateswara Rao Advocate [O One CC to Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar (Dy. Solicitor General Of lndia) TOPUC] Two CC to The GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana, at HyderabadIOUT] Two CD Copies w \ To, I 2 4 TJ GJP i I I I I I HIGH COURT DATED:0310212025 ORDER WP.No.16626 of 2023 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS P ,?\ CY\ J o o 7. ? 6 gr.-' 2612, \-.: ^* c'] .1":