High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or directions more particularly one in the nature of writ of l\Iandamus declaring that the action of the respondent No. 3 in attempting to dispossess the petitioner from his land under sy. Nos. 2 acres on the eastern side under sy. No. 451 ,459,453,454 and connected survey numbers, purchased by him under sale deed vide document NO. 2056/2013, under the threat of filing false criminal cases, is highly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 300 A of the constitution of lndia. consequently, this Hon'ble court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 3 not to interfere into disputes of civil nature in between the petitioner and the private parties in any manner whatsoever, in respect of land under Sy. NO. 451 , 459, 453, 454 and connected l::i..*' ' '"1V survey numbers, purchased by him under sale deed vide document NO 205612013. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under section 1sl cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant interim direction thereby directing the respondent No. 3 not to interfere into disputes of civil nature in between the petitioner and the private parties in any manner whatsoever, in respect of land under Sy, NO. 451 , 4Sg, 453, 454 and connected survey numbers, purchased by him under sale deed vide document NO 2056/2013. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHAMMAD ADNAN Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: Gp FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.15334 OF 2025 ORDER: Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and with the consent of learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the stage of admission.

2. Though this Court by order dated 28.05.2025 permitted the petitioner to take out notice to the unofhcial respondent No.4, proof of service of the same is not filed. However, having regard to the nature of lis involved and the manner of disposal, this Court is of the view that the matter can be proceed with without having the audience of the said respondent.

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the 3'd respondent is attempting to dispossess the petitioner from his land to an extent of Ac.35.O0 gts in Sy. Nos.446, 4461A,44618, 4461C, 447, 447 /A, 447 18, 447 lC, 4sol A, 450/8 and 4sO/C of Chengomulu village, Puduru Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (now Vikarabad District) purchased by him under registered sale deed document No.2056 of 2Ol3 under the threat of.*filing criminal cases which action of the respondents, 2 it is contended as highly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 300-4 of the Constitution of India.

4. Per contra, learned Gove rnment pleader for Home appeanng on behalf of respondents while denying the writ averments would submit that one Sri Dhana Sekhar had approached the 3.d respondent authority and lodged a compliant against the petitioner herein on o9.o4.2o2s; that on the aloresaid complaint being lodged, the respondent auLhori[ies made a G.D. entry and took up preliminary enquiry to verify as to the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the complaints. that the authorities on causing preliminary enquiry and noticin g that the contents of the complaint lodged by the said sri Dhana sekhar against the petitioner herein to be in relation to civil dispute, the authorities have closed the aforesaid complaint as ,civil in nature, on 14.O5.2O25.

5. l,carned Government pleader further submits that the respondent authorities except causing preliminary enquiry into the complai,t iodged against the petitioner herein by Sri Dhana Sekhar are not interfering in the civil dispute or trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land. 3

6. The aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Pleader for Home is taken on record.

7. Since, it is now stated to this Court that the respondent authorities having received a complaint agaiqst the petitioner and having taken up preliminary enquiry initially and thereafter having closed the complaint on 14.05.2O25 as ,ciuit in nature,, this Court is of the view that the respondent authorities are to be directed not to interfere in the civil dispute that may exist between the petitioner and Sri Dhana Sekhar or anyone, in relation to the subject land except in accordance with law.

8. Subject to the above, direction, the Writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// D SD/. B. REKHA RANI ISTANT REGISTRAR S SECTION OFFICER \ To, 1 2 J 4 5 The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Sec Telangana. riat Hyderabad, State of The Superintendent of Police, Vikharabad, Vlkharabad District. The Station house Officer, P.S. Chengomul, pargi, Vikharabad District. One CC to SRI MOHAMMAD ADNAN, Advocate tOpUCl Two CCs to GP FOR HOIVE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

6. BSR GJ Two CD Copies c HIGH COURT DATED:2610612025 ORDER WP.No.15334 of 2025 ,,, ../ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS o1