The High Court · 2025

Judgment

2. i],{,ffi i3'5;3i}'"?lilri'$xssi:''rf :3:13"u:H*e'i'l'fiH[t!:i bv c o m m issio n e r' cc SEI*H:

3. sJ:.iiJ, ?lo"?'.1i"1'.g"1''1"1'"':;;3: i#,*s"'-*uuu"r:u:"""'*'"f '5""f;"?l-:":il,^" Petition Under Article 226 ot lheConstitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to pass any order or direction more padicularly one in 15s n31g1s 9f Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondent No'2 and 3 in interfering with the property belonging to the petitioner situated in Plot No 251 and 252,admeasuring 57g sq v"ro. or 4g3-2 square meters, in survey No' in Sy.No.180,197 and 200' Situated at Bhagyanagar Phase-lll' Hydernagar' Kukatpally' Telangana' as illegal' arbitrary' without any right and in violation of Article 14 and 300A of the constitution of lndia and further direct the respondent No.2and3tonottointerferewiththepossessionofthepetitioner.sunder construction building without following the due process of law' l.A.NO:1 oF2o2s petition Under Ser the affidavit rire,i rn supptloi::lr:"rffiI:TlX in the circun,srances stated in tne High ccurt rray be preased to direct the respondent u".r r^, 3 to stay all fu(her proceeding in dcmolition Of the petitioner's unde. 661,,1ru2,and ;:;,1;:**:il:Tin:::H:: il:;);j., anc 2si,, ;,,," ,e,,n, nagar' Kukatpa rly, Telangana "',^"^i^l''11,"- rove writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner

: SRI J.PURNACHANDRA REDDy counsel for the Respc',dent Nos'1 & 2 : Gp FOR McpL ADMN ANtr URBAN Counsel for the Respo,tdent No.3 : SR DEI,/ELOPMENT I G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the foltowing ORDER J a THE o RDER: HON,BLESRIJUSTICENAGESI{BHEEMAPAKA WRI T PE TIT ION No.1532A ofZ02 5 This writ Petition is frled seeking the following prayer:- Wr#{ffi Z'::':?,x"+'i;-"!!"#,xi,], ji:;|iiw";:i;'i; '*#;,,,#rif'{ri|

2. The petitioner contends that he is the absolute owner and possessor of Plot bearing Nos' 251 and 252' admeasuring 578 square yards (or 483'2 square meters)' in Survey Nos' 180' 197' and 20O, situated at Bharyanagar Phase-III, HYdernagar, Kukatpally, Telangana, and that the ' same was acquired through registeied Gift Deeds dated 10 06'2013' uide document Nos.474212O13 and 4743/2013' He has been in continuous possession and enjoyment of the said property since the date of acquisition. Further case of the petitioner is that he made an application on 16.72.2024 for obtaining building permission to construct a residential building consisting of one stilt and five upper 1ioo.", from GHIIC, mortgaging approvals r he 1br connections. construction I 14854540) . n vz,as

3. While ti.r demolition not commercial within seven construction stri, with no deviatic attempts, the explaaations or cc under constructioi 2 *.". "".atrr, "rllli Ba :ommenced proportionar Perm;'ssir)r cn 27.o4.2o2s requiremen s' including t,.t' ser:rtri eg necessary ald electricity ' petitiorr<:r t connet'1iotr (USc No. ard obtarned building compiying with u, rand shar drainage, water :" sed on such permis"rrtuoo''' 2025, andan erectnci obtarned for domestic ln8s stood thus, res ivo ll issued a ice dated s0.o4.202s':::* allegi,g una uthorized struction, a,,d demand' u writter.r :x'ra.ation days. petitioner ,r."0 ther states t ilat the --tly adheres to the sarl ctioned r.eside,nt ial plan, n or commercial use but de.spite r epeated luthorities have refusecl to .r( ce pt his nduct a site inspection. The building remains t, and no agreement has been rnade wrth any third party for coro mercial purposes. Reddy, Iearned

4. Sri J.plrr:na r:handra Petitioner, submi,r; that cou nse I fr:r 11r. to sutrm it his eXplanatiOn on tw() occasions, the authorities refused t,r receive Consider lhe same' He further subrnits l'ha't ' $ ithout despite his efforts {r **""a'€"r' P \ I i l ---- --7 ) 3 NBKJ W.P No 1532E ot 2025 ttre genuineness to ascertain arly site inspecdon conducting demolition against him in the frrst place' the respondents' notice is illegal and the allegations action in issuing the impugped arbitrary ' Learned to"'""' submits that the petitioner is ready to file a reply to the irnpugned notice arrd requests that the respondents be directed to consider the reply and pass necessary orders in accordance with law' Reddy' learned Standing Counsel for 5. Sri G'Madhusudhan GHMC, based on written instructions from 3'd respondent- submits that the Deputy Commissioner' dated 27 'O5'2O25' respondent authorities received a complaint from the Bharyanagar Phase-lll Residents' Welfare Association stating that construction of an unauthorized commercial school is taking place on Plot Nos'251 arrd 252' in Survey Nos'180' 197' and 2oo at Bharyanagar Phase-III' Hydernagar' Kukatpally village, Medchal Malkajgiri district; and based on the complaint' the authorities inspected the site and observed that the petitioner was converting the building from a residential apartment to a School' Noticing the violation' respondent No'3 issued a Show Cause notice dated 3O'O4'2O25' and the petitioner has not submitted any reply till now' . ,/ 4 o'*"r',rr!lli of lear. standing counsel' tn" r'o*rssion

6. Acrver.rng to th..,,,-_ rearned courser ,o, ready to file rr repry z .., \-onsrd( ring the resha^,i.- the petitionet the Show that the petitioner "'u-it'n --qoL lrouce darci 'rc'o4'2o2s. "r,"" .ror] respective submissic :ting the petitioner ,o '"' the writ petition is disposed o , ai..,' two weeks frorr the date of this order. ;J; are directed to :onsider the reply arrd pass ap,proprie te orders in accordance riith law. Until such time, the rospond(nt Nos.2 artd 3 are clirec ted not to take any coercive steps agi Linst the petitioner. No cc srts. Miscellaneous applications, if anv, penciing in this writ oetitron, shall itand closed. "."r::r:::;:: To //rRUE coPY// ft SD/- T.TIRUIIALA DEVI loeeurv REGTSTRAR \t-.r,,j sECTto! oFFtcER Urban Develolrment

1. The Principal Secrolary, Municipal nOministrationd (MAUD), Telangana Secretariat, State of Telangana at Te la ngana- 500022. 2. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, ilC complex, Tankbund Road, Hyderabad, Telangana.

3. The Deputy Commis;sioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Kukatpally Circle-21, GHMC, Hyderabad, Telangana.

4. Two CCs to GP FC)ll N/CPL ADMN AND URBAN DEVELT)PMEN1 , High Court for the State cf Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. One CC to SRI J PLIRNACHANDRA REDDY, Advocate [OPUCI 6. One CC to SRI G.I\IADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC (OPJC) 7. Two CD Copies SA \qr HIGH COURT NBK,J DATED:28 tOSDa2s \ -.,1r C \T ON C I OURT ORDER WP.No.15328 of ZO2S --=:-_ _ ::: =\--\ ,t:1t\" : ))lt.i (\ ( z .L, o 03 r,iu fiE * s ' i: DISPOSING OF'I'HE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. \0 .rCd !k.,