High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Arlandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.4 and 5 in evicting the Petitioner and his wife and children's from his House bearing No. 2-6g11 ,which is situated at Hanuman Veedhi, Dharmasagar Village and Mandal, Hanumakonda District and Iockird t -re house of the Petitioner without gir ing he t disposal of Appe ,al lt the Petitioner through vide No D/'1 30C/20! Respondent l!c.lJ and straight away conducted the par dispossessed rh,', [) -'titioner by illegally during the pendency of : the Petitioner ar d ti -'spondent Nos.6 and 7 is illegal' arbitr lrl'' and .violation or ,Art r les 14, 15' 21 and 300-A of Constttution o violation of Prinr;ip e;; of Natural Justice and set aside proceeclr Panchanama ,late,i 20.05.2025 and consequently direct the Re and 5 to un-soa tlr: House of the Petitioner through vicle Hcust 68/1 , which is situz ted at Hanuman Veedhi, Dharmasagar Villa Hanumakonda t)ist'i3t permit the Petitioner' his wife arrd cltildrr his house upt- 11i:; lcsal of Appeal through vide No D/ l30Cl20i Respondent No.li. pportunity upto 4 on the file of chanama and ,/il suit between r n co n stitutional lnd ia and also qs of lmpugned ;pondent Nos.4 bearing No. 2- 1e and Mandal, ,n's to reside in 4 on the file of lA NO: 1 OF 202'5 Petition u rc e ,t Section 151 CPC praying that in the c'irc;u in the affidavi f le J n support of the petition' the High 'lou11 mi stay the procrteCirtr; s of the lmpugned Panchanama dated 20 O direct the Respr:nrj:nl Nos.4 and 5 to unseal the House of the F vide House b,,a'irg No. 2-6811 , which is situatec: at Hu Dharmasagar V llir,l e and t\/andal, Hanumakonda District trrerrr his wife and :l lc r: n's to reside in his house upto dis posir ol vide No.D/13 )C'2)24 on the file of Respondent No 3, perding Writ Petition. nstances stated y be pleased to ;.2025 and also :titioner through numan Veedhi, t the Petitioner. Appeal through disposal of the Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Re s;pondent No.1 to 5: AGP FOR REVE:NUI: CounselfortheRespondentNo.6&7:SRIJAGATHPALREIDD.,KASIREDDY The Court made tl'e, following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETI TION No.15303 of 2025 ORDER: . This Writ Petition, undcr Article 226 of thc Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following re lief: bg il.legaltg durtng tlp pet(tcru,lJ ".-..to issue qn order or direct_ion nore partlculorlq ctrte rn te nature of Wrtt of Mandamus declainq the qction i1tn" ,."pirrra"rt Nos.q and S irr euicting thc petitioner and hts tttfe- ancl cinaren,s'lroi hr'"- I tous. beoing No.2-68/ 1 which is situated oL L{anunton Veeani, Onai,tiagar Vtllage and Mqndal, Hctnumakondq Distict arrc1 tocttect the house of the fti.ti.oner without giuing the opportunitu upto clisposol oJ Appeal of the Petttioner rough uide Wo.O/ iSOOI ZOt< o), ,n" jL. oj n"spondent No.3 and straight awag cond.ucted the pr.nchc,nento o.ri aiiZ"r.r""a.. tn" ft.i,loner "1 "tri ",',ii-t.tueetr the t euioncr and Respondenl Nos.tt attd i is tltegol, arbilrory, uttc:onstitulionql ctnd uiolation of Afticles I a, l S, 2 l- ind 3OOA oI Lottslitution of Indta and qlso utolatiorL o.[ t,nncrples oy NatitraL ,]ustice and set qside proceedings of tmpugned ior"ho,,'rrr,ro inii zo.os.zOzs and consequentlA di-rect the Respondent Nos.q ancl i ti unreat n" l^l.o-u sy o! the petitioner tvougtt utdc ttuus. OictAng o) igl I u)hich is sttttated al Hanumon Veedht,. Dhanttasagar l/illage ond Mandal, Henumctkondcl Dtstrict pennil the pehtioner his uji''ani cni0ren,s to reside in his house unro cltsposttl of lpl.teal ougn uide No.D/ I 300/ 2O24 on ti.te file of re.potdent n,,.. r.... i ' -in

2. Considered the submissions of the learned. counsel for the petitioner; learned Assistant Gorrernment plcadcr for Revenue appearing for the respondcnt Nos. 1 Lo 5; Sri Jagathpal Recldy Kasi Reddy, learned counsel for the respondenL Nos.6 and 7 and perused the record.

3. The petitioner herein is the son of respondcr_rt Nos.6 and 7. It is stated that respondent Nos.6 ancl 7 havc hled a case against the petitioner under the provisions of the Maintenancc wellare of I / I 2 Parents anL Srr lior Citizens Lct' 2OO7 (for short 'th'' '\r t' 2007J before resp:rLdr: rt No 4-Revenue Divisional Ofhcer (RDo) s:ekir-rg to allorv thern i lt:l H.No.2-68/ 1 Situated at Hltnulnan Veeclhi, ' \'llarge and Mandal, Hanumakonda Dtsl -ict' aud l o 4 vide proceedings No'D/ 1300712O'2 ' dated hir'; directed the petitioner to vacale f-or:a the said Dharmasallar responden - t6.O2.202:i premises.

4. Sri Rrl1- r'lu Bhaskar, learned counsel f'lr 1htI submittcd hri - initially the petitioner has institr-r'ccL O.S.No. 103( o 202 1 (renumbered as O S'No'325'5 o' 2O file of tltc I r\dditional Junior Civil Judgr'' Llarl Hanumakol'c: District for cancellation of Gift Deed c favour of r:s:cndent No6, and during the perdencl' t suit, respotlrl I " t Nos'6 and 7 have filed a casc undcr i he and respo:'Lcllr t No 4 vide proceedings No D/ 130 I 1:2( 16.O2.2O)i di -:clcd the petitioner to vacate from thc sat Learned c rLl r r;el for the petitioner further s -rbrr itlc petitione - hir'; preferred an Appeal before respotl<1ct District (l( -11- ( ror-. against order No D/ 13O0/2024 u.-rder the TelarLq,rn: State Maintenance and Welfare of Par'-tll's Citizens R rl*; 20 l1 and the same is pending fo - ad- urli peuL()n3r ,r suit in , ,l ol1 the makonda, .e cuted in f the said AcL. 20O7, r24, daLed I prcmises. I that the t No.3 thc Rule 15 of and Senior 'ation. J Sri,li'r,rLthpalReddyKasiReddy'1earn:dr)or''ltselforthe responcl:r t \t s.6 and 7 contended that the pelitiorrel Las failed to 3 provide basic necessities and medical emergencies to respondent Nos.6 and 7, which necessitated them hle a case before respondent No.4.

6. [n view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would be met if the petitioner is allowed to stay in H.No.2_ 68/ I situated at Hanuman Veedhi, Dharmasagar Village and Mandal, Hanumakonda District, subject to paying an amount of Rs.6,O00/- per month to respondent Nos.6 and 7 on or before Sth of every month. The petitioner is further directed to submit an undertaking before the appellate authority stating that he will vacate the said premises within a period of four (4) weeks, in the event if the outcome of the appeal hled by him is adverse. Respondent No.3 shall dispose of the Appeal filed by the petitioner as cxpeditiously as possible. 7 . With the above observations, this Writ petition is disposed of No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous pe[itions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- P. PADMANABHA REDDY D PUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ \ To, 1 The Princioal Secretary' Revenue Departm Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana' SECTION OFFICER Secretariat Building,

2. The Commissioner, Maintenance and Welfare of Senior Citizens and Parents Act, 2007, Telangana, HYderabad'

3. The District Collector, Hanumkonda, Hanumkonda District' 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer cum Chairman'. Maintenance and Welfare of p"r"xr'x""t, zoiiz, Hliirrakond Divisional, Hanumkonda senior citizens "no , i ;

5. The Tah;rl1ar )harmasagar t\rlandal, Hanumakonda District' 6.. One CC tc S - I RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPLIC] 7. One CC tc S; I JAGATHPAL REDDY KASI REDDY' Adv'rcat' ' [OPUC] 8.TwoCCSlo(]PFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStatecfTelanganaat Hyderaba(i [(]l.JTl \

9. Two CD CoPit:; BSR GJPI ...,1 HIGH COUFI.l' DATED:201}6ft025 t I ORDER WP.No.1530ii of 2025 ,,1^ , /.is i;' i 0 'l Jtr 2125 :, (. . t o€ .;r), Tc,,: +a:::::.;: ,.,,/ ,7 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION' WITHOUT C:OSTS 4 @^?' W