One CC to SRI v. MAHESWAR REDDY

the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma1 the respondents to implement Rule 2 (b) (iii) of APPSS Rutes 1 applicant and incorporate his name in the appropriate pane r lnspector and Dy.S.P., category as per law while rmplement r 19.5.2015 and reissuing the amended seniority list of Dy. Supe as ordered in O.A.No.2852 of 2015 dated 3.6.2015 rc= pleased to direct )59 in favour of the ar of promotees to q the Memo dated iltendent of Police M.A. No. 52O ot 2014 Between:

1. P.Krishna Murthy, S/o Shankaraiah, A.P.Transco, Hyderabad. working as lt pector of Police,

2. P.Satyanarayana, S/o Venkaiah, Hyderaba working AS lnspector of Police, C.T.C.,

3. K.Shivakumar, S/o Hyderabad. Ramalingam, working as tnspectr,r of Police, C.l.D., &i %

4.N Bhujanga Rao, S/o Rama P.Transco, Hyderabad. Rao, working lnspector of Police, V.Ravikumar, S/o Shankaraiah, working as lnspector of police, Traffic, Hyderabad City, Hyderabad. N.Narasimha Reddy, S/o prathap Reddy, working as lnspector of police, C.l.D., Hyderabad. - A.Lakshmi Narayana, S/o Manikyam, working as lnspector of police, C.C.S., Hyderabad. M. Narender Reddy, S/o Ranga, Reddy, working as lnspector of police, Traffic Police Station, Miylpur, Cybeiabad. ...IMPLEAD APPLICANTS/PROPOSED RESPONDENTS 5 6 7 o AND 1 2 4 5 6 P V RADHA KRISHNA, S/o. p. Narayana Rao, Aged about 54 years, ace Addl. Superintendent of potice,^tnteilig'ence, Lit'Oi_t-a+oof , Hvif er65aO,'nrc. Plot.No.62, Sanjeev Housing Society: fnrimurttiy Cciforiy, fiiunenOii'fliifs, Secunderabad, Hyderabad. ....RESPONDENT/APPLICANT IN OA The Govt. of A.P.. reo hv its_Prl S_ecretary to Govt., Home Department, Secretariat of A.P., Hydera6 ad.SOOO 22 The Director General of police, A.p., Hyderabad.500 004, The Commissioner of Polrce, Hyderabad City, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad y.d Shaf_! Ahmed, S/o. and aged, not known, occ Retd., lnspector, through Director General of Police, Hydirabad. A Venkata Ramana, S/o. and.aged not known, occ Retd., lnspector, through Director General of Police, Hydeiabad 500 004. ....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated above the Hon'ble court may be preased to order for the impreadment of the Proposed Respondents as party Respondent Nos. 6 to 13 in the O.A. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2017 WVMP(TR). NO:32 s oF 20171 Between: '1. The Govt. of A.P., rep. by its prl. Secretary to Govt., Home Department, Secretariat of A.P., Hydera6ad.S0O0 22

2. The Director General of police, A.p., Hyderabad.S00 004, 3. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad .,.APPLICANTS/RESPONDENTS AND 1 P.V. RADHA KRISHNA, S/o. P. Narayana Rao, Agerl rbout 54 years, ace Addl Superintendent of Police, lntellig-ence, Lakdi-ka- I 'ol, Hyderabad, PJo. Plot.No.62, Sanjeev Housing Society-, Thrimurthy Ccl, rry, Mahendra Hills, Secunderabad, Hyderabad. ... RESPC,I DENT/ APPLICANT

2. Md. Shafi Ahmed, S/o. and aged not known, occ Re.r Director General of Police, Hyderabad. , lnspector, lhrough

3. A. Venkata Ramana, S/o. and aged not known, occ Ret Director General of Police, Hyderabad 500 004. , lnspector, through ...RESPONDE} TS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the ci r.rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mav re pleased to vacate the interim orders dated: 3O-O1-2014 in OA.No.438/2014 Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAMAKRISHNA KULKART\ I REPRESENTING FOR SRI R V MALLIKARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR HOML Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 to 13 : SRI V. MAHESI T, 'R REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : -- The Court made the following: ORDER 7 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I(ARTHIK WRIT PETITION ITR No.1519 OF 2OL7 I ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Ramakrishna Kulkarni, learned counsel representing Sri Mallikarjuna Rao' learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the present Writ Petition (TR) does not for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous' "u*irrJ 2 Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous peLitions pending, if any, shall stand closed' There shall be no order as to costs SD/. N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGIS ;j //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER One CC to SRI R V MALLIKARJUNA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI V. MAHESWAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State of Telangana Two CD Copies To, 1 2 J 4 BM 4++_ HIGH COURT DATED:2210912025 I I ORDER WP(TR).No.1519 of 2017 oR ii t( \) -L. * 1 7 :rg 2026 ,SF,r roH * DrsMrssiNG THE WRIT PETITION(TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 3) r(r 6\)'t