1 . Chava Hanumantha Rao v. '1 . The State of Telangana

Business. Fl/c. ll r.io. 1-84, Sri Ram Nagar, Moinabad, RanEa Feddy District - 501504 '17. Sama Manit( Re c cly, S/o. S.Swamy Reddy, Aged aboul 39 years, Occ -. -1-88, Murthuzaguda, Moinabad, R.[i.Dis;trict " 501504.^ Farmer, Rkr l-.1',1,r 1B.Srr Vummarli l):r'r.tkar Reddy, Sio.V. Ram Reddy. Aged at'out >2 years, Occ. Business, Fl/c. l1 l.lo B-7-61i6, Old Bowenpally, R R Nrrgar Tirrrmalagiri, Hyderabad - 50 l:11 lg.Vinagala.lagarr lr'lohan Reddy, s/o. late Buchi Reddy, AgeJ abrut 64 years, Occ. Eusines-s;. Frc. H No. 12"6-21236, Viveknagar, Kt katpally, Hyderabad - 500072

20. Naidu Sumi:lathe, W/o. Kota Eswara Rao, Aged about 39 years, Occ.

21.Kota Eswara flert: S/o. Kota Mallaiah, Aged about 41 years Occ. Business, Business, R/c. l-l I'lo. 7-1-209t3, Flat No- 50'1 , Selegan,;e Aoartrnents' Beside Slate School. H T.ierabad - 500016. R/o. Flat No 1808. Green hill Rainbow, Hitech city MMTS, (PFB, Hyderabad - 500018.

22. Thatikonda Rantrr Devi, Wo. Narahari Reddy, Aged about l9 y:ars, Occ. Business, Fl/o. trlat No. 51 0, Fortune Castle, Doctor's C)olony, S aroornagar, Hyderabad - 50,1135

23.Thaniparthy,Bh;tn.t Prasad Rao, D/o. T. Prabhakar Rao, Agted;rbout 58_-. years, Occ. Busirtr:ss, M.L.C Karimnagar, R/o. H.No. B 3-1 'l 0. F lat No. 501, Hanuman N4ansio'r, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad - 5001173.

24.Kodali Nipun Dkr K. Sudhakar Reddy, aged about 28 years. O:c. Business, R/o. H.No 8-2.-6{\413172, Banjara Green Colony, Banja'a H lls, Iload No.'12, Hyderabad - 50rll34

25.Kallem Rakesh Chandra Reddy, S/o. K. Raghuram Reddy, Agei about44 years, Occ. Busirtess, Rl o. 1 -1 -287 I 1 17, Chikkadpally, Mus;hee rabad, Hyderabad - 50(1120

26. Sii. Venu l./ladh;r r Rao, The Land Reforms Tribunal -cum- flevt nue Divisional Officer, Chervell;r [)ivision, Chevella-501503. 27. Sri. Y.S.Srinivas , 5ooo75 --he Tahsildar, Moinabad Mandal, Moinabad i.R District- ...RI:.P.NDENT' Petition unler a rticle 226 of lhe Constitution of lnrlia t)rayilg that in the circumstances stieted i,r the affidavit filed therewith, the Hi(rh Oourt may be pleased to issue r \/Vrit order or direction more particularly ore in the nature of Writ of [Vlandamus r:le,;laring the action of the responcent 12 to 15 in not registering the cornpla irt d|. 26.04.2025 of the petitioners as ille:gal, arbitrary, and violative of article '14 ar d 21 of the Constitution of lndia a,-rd violalive of the law declared by Hon hle {:;rrDreme Court in Lalita Kumari vs. Governme nt of U.P and Others (201 4) 2 SC I ' and consequently direct the respondents N o. '12 to 1 5 to forthwith register F l ti based on the complaint d1.26.04.2025 sut mitted by the petitioners by co rd ut:t ng a fair and impartial investigati,tn irto the matter in accordance with law IA NO: 10F 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedtodirect therespondentsNo-l2tol5toforthwithregisterF,l-Rbasedonthecomplaintdt. 26.04.2025 submitted by the petitioners by conducting fair and impartial investigation into the matter in accordance with raw pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI V'VENUMADHAV ;;;;;;i for the Respondent Nos'1,12To 15: GP FoR HOME C.r"""f for the Respondent Nos'2,5 TO 7: GP FOR REVENUE counsel for the Respord;;i il;;:t'& 1o: GP FoR lvlPcL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respo"a""i fi"..+t CP FOR PANCTIAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEv counsel for the Respo"d;i lti;'d; iirv'r'rannslMHA GouD' sc FoR HMDA counsel for the Respord;;;l'i;.g' 5ni c'nnoHusuDHAN REDDY' sc FoR Counsel for the Respondent No'11: SRI K'PRADEEP REDDY' SC FOR GRAM Counsel for the Respondent Nos'16 TO 27: - PANCHAYAT GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition N o. 15269 of 2O25 ORDER: Heard lr_;rned counsel for the petltioners, l.arn,td (;overnment Pleader for l-lc rrrr appearing for respondent Nos.1, i2 to 5, learned Governmen,- Pl(:acer for Revenue appearjng for respondent Nc;.2, 5 to 7, learned Goverrrr:nt pleader for MA & UD, appearing frtr respor dent Nos.3 and 10, learnerl Sovernment pleader for panchayat Raj appearing for respondent No.'l sr V.Narasimha Goud, rearned standing ( ounser for HMDA appeitrirrg f rr respondent No.B, learned Standinct Counse for GHMC appedring fcr Cr;j)rncjcn:, N!. j ai-id Sri K.irraateep ileddy. i.:.rir-,.:: Stanciing counsel for :i',r.r i)anchayat appearing for respondent No.r l ar 11 perused [he rccor<i.

2. Havin,l 'erl,t.d to the manner of disposal of thc ,,^/rit per-i iun at the admission st:r]e a r d ihe nature of /s involved, this Crrurt ,s _, the view that notice lo ur:fflcial respondent Nos.16 to 27 is not nec,lssary for adjudication,tf the rresent Writ petition.

3. The : t::,.: r f the petitioners, in br-:ef, is that, r.nOrrtir they had approacheo icriFrc i dent Nos.12 to 15 and lodgecl a _orr rlaint on 26.04.2025 t(r -(lc j,l.er an FIR based on lne contents cf .he, (.orirl)aint and to have a fatr irr,/rl.ti!ation into lhe mai.ter in accordancc wirl lauv, no /reQistr.trr:,J whicit action cf rhe respondent:;-a itt no r i ies jt is 1; i I i I 2 contended as htghly lllegal, arbitrary, in violatron of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also the guidelines laid down by the Apex Court in Lalita Kumari v/s. Government of ll.P.l, with a consequential direction to the respondents to forthwith register a crime based on the complaint submitted by the petitioners.

4. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 12 to 15 would submit that, though the petitioners had approached the respondents-a uthorities and lodged a cornplaint on 26.04.2025 claiming act of forgery and executing sale deeds despite restraint orders from this Court, the authorities have taken up preliminary enquiry and if the enquiry reveals commission of any cognizable offence, the authorities would register a crime and investigate thereinto

5. Learned Government Pleader further submits that, after causing preliminary enquiry, in the event the authorities come to a conclusion of the dispute to be civil in nature, they would take further action thereon by informing to the petitioners, in such an event, the petitioners have to avail further remedies provided under BNSS.

6. I have taken note of the respective contentions urged ' [zotE] ra scn zr: 3

7. Tho,;gh :he pr:titioners by the present Writ pelitior ha,r: called in question thr: inzr:: on of the respondents-a uthorities in regis;tering FIR, it is to be noteri 'h;rt based on the complaint lodged by the pel itioners as complainants, ir tl e respondent police authorities do not regis er an FIR, they have tcr ai,ail further remedies under BNSS, rz;:, approtching the superrntend:n r>, Police in terms of section 173(4) ard thereefter taking further actio- ..rnc( r section r.75 or BNSS. However, it is no, shr,wn to this court or thrl p,lt tirners availing such remedies and inritea(i ha I filed the present Writ P(,rtl il n, B. Furthrrr , tlrs court in w.p.No.7159 of 2025 forr,wing th: raw raid down by thr: Acr.> (:ouft in Sakiri Vasu v/s. State of uttar pradestf and M. Subran.,aniam and Ors. v/s. S. Janaki a,,rd t)ri and the decisions of {h. r.-.,rrdrnate Bench of this court in w.p.r,lo,2149t of 2019, I / df.21.04.20i'0 rA/l) Nc.B1B9 and 12691 of 2020, dt.31..0t.)024, and also in W.P.No.3,7.1,1,t tf 2022 and W.p.No.3839l of ZOt9, htrd hr:ld trat in the event of th€ rr, sr, (rrd e nts-a uthorities are not registerin(l crime rased on the complain., ti'r pr:titioners have to avail further rlme(lies orovided under Cr.P.C./BM:;:; and cannot approach this Court un,Jer ,\rtrc . 226 of the Constitutrol 01 t rdia seeking exercise of extraordinanz jur sdic,ron. 200i1 (l) S( ( ,1()., (2Ol()) l.r \a (' i's 4 respondents-authorities

9. Since, it is stated that the compiaint given by the petitioners to respondent No' 15 is under investigation, this court is of the view thai the are directed to conduct preliminary enquiry and inform the petitioners of ihe action taken either by registering FIR or issuing an intimation of the action taken to enabre the petitioners to avail further remedies under BNSS.

10. Granting liberty as noted above, the Writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

11. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ stand closed. petition shall \ To //TRUE COPYII SD/-N. SRIHARI UTY REGISTRAR D ECTION OFFICER 1 J 5 4 ) d, Hyderabad, und, Hyderabad, Administration, B.R.K. Bhavan Tela ngana -500063 The Principal Secreta ry to. Home, B.R.K. B havan, State of Telangana -500063 The Princ rpa I Secretary to Revenue, B.R.K. Bhavan Tankb State of Tel angana .500063 The Principal Secreta ry to Muni Tankbund, Hyderabad, State of The Principa I Sebretary to Pancha yath Raj and Rural Development. B.R.K Bhavan, Tan kbund, Hyderabad, State of The District Collector, Ranga Reddy Dist rict, Kongarkalan, R R dist, Hyderabad-501510 The Land Reforms Tribunal -cum- Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella 6. Division, Chevella - 501S03. 7. The Tahsildar cum sub-Registrar, Moinabad Mandar, Moinabad, R.R.District- 500075. 8 If_Y:tr,"_ry1,tgn Commissioner, Hyderabad Metro Devetopment Authority, 9yarla Jayanthi Complex, Ameerpet, Hyderabad_500082.' .l.he Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad irr,lunicipal Corporation, Tankbund, Hyderabad. Telangana -500063. ,x 'r )wn and country Pla1ry1gr]rd to 5th Floors 640 opposite

10.The Direct,:r :)f :+ii?lt1*1, jil,;f '' Ni;:;iiltt'ra'rr:;,r Ralsi$"tl[3,.:[:'J, i 3 l[3 3 3[iI :: ff i : 31# ir ""?'""'',38 1 ti,";I'il Jo"#; i',n ;,,, * Re d d v N a g a r' '.:.h*1",1t41;"'j.'"'^',vathsuransarVrrage' Gachibowti, r{yderabird g909.32

500075. r:ffi ffi##ii,'r;:Ll"di'mq*liq',t',,rt*;ilJ"ffi'# ro 6L"""bt to sRt \/ vENUMADHAV, Advocate to1r",L ii i'ii" d6.i,icii 'oR HoME High court for the sl ,,, fil,t"6t,t; l"tf litA- RE'ENUE, Hish court ror the Siate ,)r rolansana, at ,rn ?IX"6t3?, ,!;!lli'J* MPcL ADMN.& uRBAN DEV' Hish oour:ror the state '" ;ii"6s;;',,r'-Jvg"IlK3rl?X+L RAJ & RURAL DEV, His, court ror the 20.Two CCa to (iF' f oR F rf rt:tanrrana, at : lmf$,,o'llrld+titixiftr$i, tux*.,, " gftgg I'iff ' a 24.Two CD CoPiers a PSK PSK HIGH COURT DATED:2510612025 ORDER WP.No.15269 ot 2025 'i: C, (-.) a: c' t'r4T A , rit ?025 ,..r i I l DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT CO$rS ,{ 0g