The High Court · 2025

Counsel for the Petiti()ners: SRI M. DAMODAR REDDY Counsel for the Res5rt>ndent No.1: AGP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RIJRAL DEV Counsel for the Resp,ondent Nos.2 and 3: SRI KATTA PRADEEP tilEDDY, SC Counsel for the Respc ndent No.4:---- The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No. 1 5 12 9 of 2025 ORDER: '['lrrs u rit pctrtion rs lilcd secking t]-rc lbLlorling prayer:- ''...to issue atr order or dtrectiort ntore parlicularlA one in the noture of Wit of Mandantus declaing the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the impugned tndiutdual demoliion notices, dated 13/05/2025 direding the petitioners to remoue their respectiue business center i.e. Welding Shop, Kirana SI'op and Hotel of the petittoners uthich are situated abutting to R and B Road of Pathapally Village, Pebbair Mand.aL WanapafthA Distict without giuing ang notice and opportunity to the petitioners as illegal, unlauful, contrary to lalu and consequently direct th.e respondents not to demolish the aboue mentioned shops of the petitioners Lrithout following due process ol lau.t and aLso consider the application submitted bg the petitiorrcrs for grant of Trade License for rurlning the aboue business cettters and pass..," Ilearrcl Sri M.Damodar Rcctrl,v, lcarned counsel for the ). I)('tili()11ers: lclrrncrl Assistarirt (lovcrnment Pleeider for l'ancharat Ra,; appcaring lor rcspondcnt No.I :rnd Sri Katta Pra<lccp ticdd,r. leitrnccl Stancling Counsel, appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3. With the consent of the respective parties, this $'rit petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have impleaded respondent No.4 as proforma .) JSR, J wp_15129_2025 respc)ndent z:nd as they are not seeking any relieI aqzrinst him, notic,::s nor requrred to respondent No.4.

4. Lerrrn, l counsel for the petitiolter:i sL,ri l rts thar periti()rcr \ rs.I to 3 have occupied sma1l cxt(-.ltts r l- r_nr' l:ind bcion3l'rc I th(' (ior.'e rnntr.nt lons [;ar.]< r,rtri ; r'., hrrr c conslr-u(1('(l sqrall sheds artrl htrve betn rLtr.l.lnl r,.r i:tr: sh,rIt, kaka h,rr,'i i,:al kiratna sl-rop, rcspr:ctilelr iltri (:\1._ ,,ul .itr;r livclihrcd ll':ccpr tl-re zrbovc sirici propcrt\, I I l lr 't ':.r'r-s rir., not hrlve artv other properties. Respondent \o.3 tss.ucd thc impugnt:d n( tice, dated 13.05.2025, directing r1l p, I rr)r-rcrs ro remove the ( (,nstructions made by them within three days or else the). w.otrld take appropriate action. Learned counsel further subnrirs that respondent No.3, without issr-iir Lg prior notice, straig 1t. away has issued the impugned ordcr c irecting the petitioneri to remove the shop, and therefore, thc im pugt-recl order issut:d i. in gross vrolation of the principrles o: n:trLiral lu sl lce . .). Pcr cor T:t. lcarrrcd Srandrng Couns( i ,ri)i rcspon(lc'.l Nr I sr-tbmits tl-.itt []tc ltctir_ioltc rs rir lLr l.!q lot- semblance cltqht or interest in respect oi lhe sl:i1e'r f I )l)c \ 3 JSR, J Wp_15129 2025 The petitioners without submitting alry explanation to the impugned notice/have straight away approached this Court and lrled the present writ petltion and the petitioners are not entitled lor anv rclief soughr ibr in this u'rir petition. (t. A pe rus:rl ol thc material ervzrrlable on record reveals that the petitioners havc occupied the Govcrnment land and made c()nstru( tior) o1- tht'- sl]cds and hatve becn lunning u,elding shop, liak:t hotcl ;-rncl krrana shop, rcspcctively. Respondent No.3 issrre<1 thc inrpr,runcd norice, dated 13.05.2025 directing the petitioners to remove the constructions made in the Government property within three days. The contents of the impugned notice clearly reveal that respondent No.3-Gram ( t Panchayat has not issued arty show-cause notice. Hence, in order to render substanLial justice to the parties, the impugned notice, dated 13.05.2025 is treated as show-cause notice and the petitioners are directed to submit explanation to the above sard noticc rvrthin a period of one u'eek from the date of receipt ol ..r copr ol this order and on such explanation being slrirnrittt'cl, rcsporrci, nt No.3 Ls ciirt-r'tccr, to consicler the same lntl pass approp; iate orders in accordancc u'ith lau' after giving iln opportur'ritY ol pcrsonarl hearing to lhe pctitioners, within a I 1', ,r-11.) )a16 rr" i \ r 'l pcIioi l j I,',ti ',r.r'ks tllcreal'Ler. 'l'ill s'lt lr lir:lr' is di-tl:t,'cl ll()l to take all\ co.r( i\'( :'lcps I 1i \l L I o1 rllt' ' subject pro J )( r'-\'.

7. 1'1 i | :1re above directions. the Writ Peliti:'r:r l:' tri: posr:d of' No cc sts. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous application'i' if any' pend. ng In tL e \\'rit petition shall stand closed' SD/- P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY/I I SECTION OFFICER The P.irrcical S,ecretary, The State of Telangana P'r''ll''r, ri a Drlpadmenl Secre,ariar, l.;derabad. in" vriil]l ei',ir'aO Develocn.rent Offcer. Pebba' \lrrr'lrr tVaniroarthy Districl ihl iin,,r,ry,, Secretary, The Grampanchayat Pilrr:rpr: ' ' iagrr' Pebbarr Mandirl, \,r" anir rarthy District o;; Ciic 3 V l'amodar Redoy Advocate [oPJ ] i*o CC, to 6p for panchayat Rd1 Rural Deveiopme,nl. Frg'r 3ourt for the st:te ,rf Trlla'- ana. at Hvderabad IOUT] On"-CC:r S' (atta P'adeep Reddv. SC[OPUC] Two CD CcPi':; 1

2. 3, 4 E 6 7 To, TJ GJP \ $,,' .,/ HIGH COURT VACATION COURT DATED:1410512025 ' .;'! : s N\ ,:) ORDER WP.No.1 51?-9 of 2025 DTSPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT C:OSTS @ L ) ,6 d \