The High Court · 2025

sri.Kanakati venkateshwarlu @ Venkanna, s/o. Sri.K.Buchaiah, Aged about. 46 y.rr., O"". Agriculture, Rio. tvlrryala Village, Noothankal tt/andal Suryapet District' Telangana (A1) ...pETlrtoNER/AccusED A1 AND The state of Telangana, through station House officer, Noothankal, Police Station, Noothankal Town ind Mandal, Suryapet District, Rep. by its State Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, at Hyderabad ..,RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under section 480 and 483 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the Hlgh court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused A1 herein on He"grrai Bair in connection with crime No. 45 of 2025, dated.17.O3.2O25, iegistereU by the Noothankal, Police Station, Noothankal Town and Mandal, Su?apet Disirict, for punishable C/Sec.249, 189(2), 191(2), 191(3)' 61(2)' 103(2) r/w 190 of BNS Act,2023 CRIMINAL PETITIO NNO :657O OF 2025 Between:

1. Mr.Kanakati Sravan, S/o. K.Uppalaiah, Aged about' 32 years, Occ Business' R/o.MiryalaVillage,NoothankalMandal,SuryapetDistrict,Telangana(A2)' 2. Mr.pediinti Madhu, s/o. p.Nagaiah, Aged about. 28 years, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Miryala Village, Noothankil Mandal, Suryapet District, Telangana (A3)' about 36 years, Occ' Agriculture, R/o. Miryala Village, Noothankal Mandal, Suryapet District, Telangana (A4)

3. Mr.Gandasiri Venkatesh, S/o. Sriramulu,

4. Kanaliati Siikanth, S/o. Late Srinu, Aged about. 28 years, Occ. Agriculture. Rio. Miryala Village, Noothankal Mandal, Suryapet District, Telangana (46)' -Aged

5. Peddinti Ganesh, {1,o. Avilaiah, Aged about. 30 years, Or;c Agrii:ulture. R/o. Ivliryala Village, Noo:hankal Mandal, Suryapet District, Telangana fA7). AND ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED A2TIC A4, A6 & A7 The State of Telangana, Through Station House Officer, Noothankal, t,ol ce t\rlalice Noothankal rown and l\rlanrjal, suryapet District. Rep. by its State public prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, ;r'. Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO C()MPLAINANT Petition under Serlion 480 and 483 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of crirninal F)etition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused A1Z to,A4, 46 and A7 herein on Regular Bail in connection with Crime No 45 of 2025, dated.1710312025, register,:d by the Noothankal, Police Station, Noothankal Town and Mandal, Suryapet Drstrict, for punishable UiSec.249, Signa .1 g9l2), 191(2), 191(3), 61(2), 103(2) rtw 1l)0 of BNS Ac|.2023 This Petition cominl; on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments cf r:iri c. Hari Preeth, Advocate for the [)etitioners in both petitions and srr v. J thr:rnder Rao, Additional Public Prosecuror on behalf of the Respondent in both petitions. The Court made the follow'ing: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CRIMINAL PETITION Nos. 6561 & 6570 0F 2025 COMMON ORDER: These Crirninal Petitions are filed under Sections 48O and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, 'BNSS) by the petitioners/accr-rsed Nos.1, 2 to 4, 6 & 7, seeking bail in Crirne No.45 of 2025 on the file of Noothanka-l Police Station, Suryapet District, registered for thc offences punishable under Sections 249, 189(2), 191(2), 191(3),67(2) & 103(2), r/w L9O of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, 'BNSJ.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused Nos- 1, 2 to 4, 6&7and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/State. Perused the entire rnaterial placed on record. ,'- . 't-.. -, L.&\_, 2

3. The casio of the prosecution is ttLat on

17.O3.2O25 at about 16:0O hor-rrs the cle-facto cornplainant lodged a cornplaint statirrr;1 that accused Nos. I to 31 formed into ,an ut:rlawful assernbly arrr:.ed with deadly 'urzeapons artc when the deceased was corning to the house lrom his agriculture lartd, they were attacked arLd lreat hirn to death dr-re :,t political rivalry.

4. Learned c,ounsel for the petitioners con[ended that though Lhe narnes of the petitionr:rr.i were rnentioned ir-r t.he cornplaint, there is nrt rolc played by the pel.itiorters and that false alleglittic,nrt were levelled aElairastt thern. He further argued th.at the petitioners are innocent persons ancl tl-rt,:y are nothing to dc, with the aforesaid offr:nccs;. He further stated that petitioners/accused Nrcs..t, 2 to 4, 6 & 7 ar<: ll,:pt in judicial custody for rr,rr,: than 40 days frorn their arrest and the allegatior-rs rnade against thern co not constitrltu any offences zrlle ged $- - r--"-.,. _) by the prosecution and hence he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioners.

5. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed for grant of bail stating that that accused No.1 planned how to murder the deceased and conducted rneeting with accused Nos.2 to 31 and 33 to 40 held on l3'O3'2O25 and advised accused Nos.2 to 8 to kill hirn at any cost' He fr.rrther subrnits that if the accused persons are released on bail, they rnay tarnper the witnesses and hence he prays to disrniss the petition' Having consid.ered the rival submissions rnade 6 by learned cor.r.nsel for the respective parties ald after pen.sal of tLre entire rnaterial available on record, as there is direct and active involvement of the petitioners in the aforesaid crirne and as there are serious allegations against the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. .r' .,.-.. 4

7. Accordingly, these dismissed. Criminal petitions Miscr:llar eor-rs applications, pending; if any, shall stand c[osed. Sd/- P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA DEPUTY REGISTRAR

1..- //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Judicial First Olass Magistrate Court at Thungathurthy, 2. The Superintendenl. Sub Jail, Suryapet District. 3. Two cCs to the pr- krlic prosecutor, State of Telangana, High C rurl Buildings at HyderabadIOUI]

4. The Station House t)fficer, Noothankal, Police Station, Noothank;rl Town and Mandal, Suryapet lf istrict,.

5. One CC to Sri C. Hari Preeth, Advocate IOPUCI 6. Two CD Copies Plp/gh rY i VACATION COURT .--.. Op- \ \ ?- B '\llt u6 o t z!', 'r C.' HIGH COURT DATED:2110512Ct25 COMMON ORDER GRLP.Nos.6561 and 6570 o12025 DISMISSING BOTH CRIMINAL PETITIONS. q(,P &(+tr