High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lrrclia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, ttre High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order, or Direction, more particularly in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of Respondorrts No. 'l to 9 in not considering the representations/complaints dated between 25.04.2025 and 05.05.2025 submitted by the Petitioner, and in not discltarging their statutory duties by failing to take action against the power theft and illegal construction committed by Respondent No.10 and 't1 at House \l's. 5-94/154/P/lll, 5- 94/154,BHEL Metro Enclave Road No. '10, Patelguda Villa1le, Ameenpur Mandal, sangareddy District, as illegal, arbitrary, and violate of A rticles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia. lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High QDurt may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to amend the affidavit with following clanges, Para numbers with ,lt is respectfully submitted that in writ Petition No tffP-2948 of 2025, this Hon'ble High court of Telangana was pleased to issu e specific directions to Respondent No.9 to take action against respondent 10 slrictly in accordance with Iaw on illegal constructions situated at the premises of Flespondent Nos. 10 and 11. However, despite the clear and binding orders of this Hon'ble Court, Respondent No. t has failed to comply with the said diret{ions, and no action has been taken to date.",Para number 25 "it is submitte:d that on 03.05.2025, Petitioner approached Respondent No.7 and the Respontle nt No.8, who endorsed Petitioner complaint and instructed the Respondent No r)0 to enquire. However, Respondent No.6 refused to accept the complaint despitr: official endorsement. ,'and lA1 of 2025 Prayer as "lt is therefore respectfully prayed that this Horlble court may be pleased to direct Respondent Nos. 1 to 9 tr> take appropriate action against Respondents Nos. 10 and 11 for theft of electric ty at House Numbers 5- g4t 1s4lPtlll,5-941 154, Bhel Metro Enclave road nc' 10, Pateguda Village' Ameenpur [\Iandal, Sangareddy District, Telangana, and tc pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper ir the interest of justice and fair inquiry" in W.P.No.'15061 of 2O25 including affidavit and interlocutory application, in the interest of Justice and pass such other order or orders. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondent No. 10 and 11 to halt the ongoing illegal construction at House No's. 5-94i154lPllll, 5-941154, BHEL Metro Enclave Road No. 10, Patelguda Village, Ameenpur Mandal, Sangareddy District, which is in violation of the Telangana Municipal Act,2019, G.O. No. 168, and the Telangana Building Rules, 2O12, And further direct Respondent No.08 not to undertake any further construction at the said premises pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased that direct Respondent No.06 to register an FIR and initiate appropriate legal action against Respondent No.10 and Respondent 11 under the relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)ilndian Penal Code, the Electricity Act, 2003, the Electricity (Amendment) Act, 20O7, and the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI PADIRE KEERTHI TEJA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for Respondents No.2to4 : SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TSSPDCL Counsel for Respondents No.5&6 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for Respondents No.7&8 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondents No.9 Counsel for Respondents No.l0&11 : SRI CH.JAYAKRISHNA The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH ]]IIEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITIO N No. 15061 0F 20 Z_tr ORDER: When the matter is taken up for ht:aring, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of -his Court to withdraw this Petition u'ith a liberty to file a fresh application

2. Permission is accorded

3. AccordinglY, the Writ Petition is rlismissed as withdrawn. However, iiberty was given to thr: petitioner to file a fresh application, if necessar5r. Therr: shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions Pending, closed. if alt, shall stand SOLA. rd.s. ,\: GOWRI SHANKAR TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ,',.'" \i SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI PADIRE KEERTHI TEJA REDDY' Advocate' [OPUC] 2.TwoCCstoGPFoRENERGY'HighCourtforthel)tateofTelangana.[oUT] 3. One CC to SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR T(;IIPDCL' [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the Stater of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5.TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtforthe:{itateofTelanganaat Hyderabad. [OUTI \ry

6. One CC to SRI CH.JAYAKRISHNA, Advocate IOPUC] 7. Two CD CoPies. HIGH COURT DATED:31 t07t2O2S ,,. /t r) ,) i I ? 2 ; 8iI 2025 f r.l;r7.111.1:-il --=:-,=-t-- ORDER WP.No.15061 of 2O2S DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WTHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS I l0 la-(