High Court · 2025

Petition unde lilec-i:n 151 CPc praying that in the circurnstirnc€s stated in the affidavit filed in s up p,.rt of the petition, the High Court rr ay, be ;leased to direct the Responden' Nc .5 not to interfere into peacefur rife arrd r bert / and arso not to interfere into r;rr il ri sputes between the petitioner and Resprcndelt Nos.6 to 9 and not to threa e r ., execute the registration sale deeri or, th( name of Respondent Nos.6 t r I ilr J not to threaten to handover the land ot the petitioner to an extent Ac.'l .02: 'it:; Survey Nos.35AA/1/2 and 36/E/2, vrriclr is ;ituated at District to the *too' Mandal'. lu:n" Tharamatipet Village' Abdullapurmet Respondent Nos.6 to 9 pending disposal of the writ Petition' Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents No.1to5 : GP FoR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No'6to9 : The Court made the following: ORDER -- T,IIE TION'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD J3:UMAR !YRIT PET ITION No. t5 o46 oF2 02t3 ORDER: Counsel for the pctiti:ner, l:arned C,I-I oc-n r1l of He;ttr ,tltl-lted Govcrnrnr-'n I ,. circ1er lor Home appearing to 5 and perused the record respondeD | ,lO s. l 2. Despit r llr s Court ordering nodc 9, proof ol' s, r., j ::r j5 ne1 Iiled till daf e. to the niitur( of ,ls involved and the e to responclen NO;.6 to However, lravi;tg :- ,gard Writ Pctitio I disposed r,rf lrtllout having the audience manner of di spo sral : i thc tlr s; Court is of the view that the me:ttr:r c.it 1 be o. llle said respondents

3. The c:rrsr: ,r- the petitioner, brief, is tL;rt the grr, respondent t:; n.r:,rl-errng into the personal life and Ii _ertr. rrl.rhe petitioner anrl rl-r, ;nterlering rn the civil disputes b-V :alling he perilionFr lo ir r),li( e station and threatening the p-ttli)n() to hando'er thr' r: nrr rf the petitioner to an extent ol Ac.o. io s ts, in Sv. No.3tA . 1.2 and an ex[ent of Ac.0.32 g:s. tn l]y. i r Ll.lg to an extent of Ac. 1 .02 gts. s r tu€ ted at Tharamalipet i illiir-', Abdullapaurmet Mandal, Rar1la Rcd ly District, to tlr< '( sD,)ndcnt Nos.6 to 9, which action No.36/tr/2. a J :i of t tre respondents contended AS illegal, arbitr a11 2 'l unconstitutional and in violatlon A of the Constitution of India' of Articles 14, 15' 21 and 300- Per contra, leatrred' Government Pleader appearlng on denYing the writ averments wouid ent in the present Writ Petition had authorities and lodged a complianl .O5.2025 and based on the aforesaid respondent, the authorities took up

4. behalf of resPondents whiie submit that the 7th respond approached the resPondent against the Petitioner on 05 comPlaint lodged bY the 7th preliminary enquiry' Learned Government Pleader would further submil that 5 the authorities noticing that during the Preliminary enqurry' there exists civil disputes which are the subject matter of st'ilt uide O-S.. No'10O5 of 2022 ' L]ne comPliant lodged bY the 7th respondent herein was ciosed as 'civil in nature' on 07 'O5 '2025 by issutng intimation to the compiainant of the action taken on the same Learned Government Pleader further submits that except 6. for the purpose of causing preliminary enquiry into the complaint lodged by the 7h respondent herein' the respondent authorities are not interfenng in the civil disputes nor interfering with the life and liberty of the pettttoner J

7. H:ti.r 11: taking not,. o r cgard to the the lact that lodged br ,l 7'tt respondenI submissions made as abc ve and rnrLrally a compliant i.r avin q been petititne r ir. rd the agains t the llt(' purpose authori tie i (rI of causing preliminari the afore:;a id compiain t having called thereafter h Lr. : i I .loscd thc complain t Court is 01 I tc \ re\{, that the respondent directed nor r r> er. qurr y into the p: titi, tnt:r and on 07.(t;.2)2S this authoritirs ,lrc 6 [6 with the life and liberty of the trrc tit oner I r erli:re except rn ac:r .rj: l]ce u,ith law

8. Subjet r disposed of. N tl tite above clirection, the Writ petiiior IS ) ( r) itS Miscell tr e.ltt pe trtions, if Petition, shall s r. rr r.lost:d any, pending in the V.rit To, //TRUE COPY// .\ SD/-A,V.S. I)RASAD EPt-try RE(itSTRAR SE(]TION ()FFICER 1 The Principal S€ cf etit 1,, Home Department, Secreta State of Telangan'r llyderabad. at Builcling, Sec etarrat,

2. The Director Gene rat ,)' Police, Telangana, Hyderabad. 3. The Commissiore o'coilce, Rachakonda, Rachakonda Conr rission( rrate, Ranga Reddy Dist, ,cl .

4. the ASStaflt Crln rmr:,s;ioner of Police, Vanasthalipuram circl,r, ri ans, t Reddy l I -l.Jlil-lfi;;1;':;,* ::-, """':: , rll1 ::ill:l::' 6. One Ct'o "l'.'",,0, * ? -[v'lo C0sto '8 t'r ' - I\No CD Co[ le 5 $ BSK BS HIGH COURT DATED:18106lrr-025 ) ORDER WP.No.15046 of 2025 .\::._ rrE ( ; :r. o Ll 0t -* + ,ut M m f) ? ^4r :.lE l) r -- :-=--a? DISPOSING OF'IHE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS o@" +n